{"title":"Assessing young children’s self-regulation in school contexts","authors":"L. Hutchinson, Nancy E. Perry, Jenna D. Shapka","doi":"10.1080/0969594X.2021.1951161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Self-regulation describes how individuals assess and adapt to demands within and across environments. Research accumulated over the past quarter century identifies self-regulation as a powerful predictor of children’s school success. However, studying young children’s self-regulation in school is challenging. Tools that are easy and efficient to administer, closely linked to curriculum and learning in classrooms, and that do not require self-reports from children are needed. Here we report on the development and validation of the Self-Regulation In School Inventory (SRISI), a teacher-report tool designed to assess typically developing young children’s self-regulation in school. Then, we present data from the SRISI that shows how different targets of self-regulation in school were related to one another, school adjustment, child gender, and achievement. Data were gathered from 28 teachers who provided ratings of 307 kindergarten children’s (age range = 4.96–6.61 years old) self-regulation using the SRISI. An exploratory factor analysis on the SRISI items distinguished three targets of self-regulation in school: ‘Emotion Regulation’, ‘Self-Regulation of/for Learning’ and ‘Socially Responsible Self-Regulation’. Path analysis confirmed the relationship between child gender and ER and SRSR, and between SRL and achievement. Findings are situated within a larger discussion concerning the assessment of young children’s self-regulation in school.","PeriodicalId":51515,"journal":{"name":"Assessment in Education-Principles Policy & Practice","volume":"75 1","pages":"545 - 583"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessment in Education-Principles Policy & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2021.1951161","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
ABSTRACT Self-regulation describes how individuals assess and adapt to demands within and across environments. Research accumulated over the past quarter century identifies self-regulation as a powerful predictor of children’s school success. However, studying young children’s self-regulation in school is challenging. Tools that are easy and efficient to administer, closely linked to curriculum and learning in classrooms, and that do not require self-reports from children are needed. Here we report on the development and validation of the Self-Regulation In School Inventory (SRISI), a teacher-report tool designed to assess typically developing young children’s self-regulation in school. Then, we present data from the SRISI that shows how different targets of self-regulation in school were related to one another, school adjustment, child gender, and achievement. Data were gathered from 28 teachers who provided ratings of 307 kindergarten children’s (age range = 4.96–6.61 years old) self-regulation using the SRISI. An exploratory factor analysis on the SRISI items distinguished three targets of self-regulation in school: ‘Emotion Regulation’, ‘Self-Regulation of/for Learning’ and ‘Socially Responsible Self-Regulation’. Path analysis confirmed the relationship between child gender and ER and SRSR, and between SRL and achievement. Findings are situated within a larger discussion concerning the assessment of young children’s self-regulation in school.
期刊介绍:
Recent decades have witnessed significant developments in the field of educational assessment. New approaches to the assessment of student achievement have been complemented by the increasing prominence of educational assessment as a policy issue. In particular, there has been a growth of interest in modes of assessment that promote, as well as measure, standards and quality. These have profound implications for individual learners, institutions and the educational system itself. Assessment in Education provides a focus for scholarly output in the field of assessment. The journal is explicitly international in focus and encourages contributions from a wide range of assessment systems and cultures. The journal''s intention is to explore both commonalities and differences in policy and practice.