Comparison of Quantium Consciousness Index and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: An Observational Study.

IF 2 4区 管理学 Q3 BUSINESS
Makam S Harsha, Pradeep K Bhatia, Ankur Sharma, Priyanka Sethi
{"title":"Comparison of Quantium Consciousness Index and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: An Observational Study.","authors":"Makam S Harsha, Pradeep K Bhatia, Ankur Sharma, Priyanka Sethi","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The quantium consciousness index (qCON), an electroencephalography (EEG)-based modality, has no studies regarding intensive care unit (ICU) sedation, though very few studies describe its use for assessing depth of anesthesia in the operation theater. In this study, we evaluated qCON for assessing sedation compared with Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) in patients on a mechanical ventilator in the ICU.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eighty-seven mechanically ventilated patients aged between 18 and 60 years were investigated over a 12-hour period. They were given a standardized dosage of sedation comprised of a bolus dose of propofol 0.5 mg/kg and fentanyl 1 µg/kg, and then infusions of propofol 2-5 mg/kg/hour and fentanyl 0.5-2 µg/kg/hour. These drug infusions were adjusted to achieve a RASS score between 0 and -3. Using the qCON monitor, the investigator recorded the qCON values and then assessed the RASS score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,218 readings were obtained. After contrasting each qCON value correspondingly with time to each RASS value, we found their correlation to be statistically significant (ρ = 0.288, <i>p</i> <0.0001). With the help of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, we were able to differentiate appropriate from inappropriate levels of sedation. A qCON value of 80 had a sensitivity of 72.67% and a specificity of 67.42% (AUC 0.738 with SE 0.021).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>qCON can be used for assessing sedation levels in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>CTRI/2019/07/020064.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Harsha MS, Bhatia PK, Sharma A, Sethi P. Comparison of Quantium Consciousness Index and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: An Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(4):491-495.</p>","PeriodicalId":46235,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business-To-Business Marketing","volume":"21 1","pages":"491-495"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9067479/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business-To-Business Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24183","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The quantium consciousness index (qCON), an electroencephalography (EEG)-based modality, has no studies regarding intensive care unit (ICU) sedation, though very few studies describe its use for assessing depth of anesthesia in the operation theater. In this study, we evaluated qCON for assessing sedation compared with Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) in patients on a mechanical ventilator in the ICU.

Materials and methods: Eighty-seven mechanically ventilated patients aged between 18 and 60 years were investigated over a 12-hour period. They were given a standardized dosage of sedation comprised of a bolus dose of propofol 0.5 mg/kg and fentanyl 1 µg/kg, and then infusions of propofol 2-5 mg/kg/hour and fentanyl 0.5-2 µg/kg/hour. These drug infusions were adjusted to achieve a RASS score between 0 and -3. Using the qCON monitor, the investigator recorded the qCON values and then assessed the RASS score.

Results: A total of 1,218 readings were obtained. After contrasting each qCON value correspondingly with time to each RASS value, we found their correlation to be statistically significant (ρ = 0.288, p <0.0001). With the help of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, we were able to differentiate appropriate from inappropriate levels of sedation. A qCON value of 80 had a sensitivity of 72.67% and a specificity of 67.42% (AUC 0.738 with SE 0.021).

Conclusion: qCON can be used for assessing sedation levels in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.

Clinical trial registration: CTRI/2019/07/020064.

How to cite this article: Harsha MS, Bhatia PK, Sharma A, Sethi P. Comparison of Quantium Consciousness Index and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: An Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(4):491-495.

机械通气重症患者的量子意识指数与里士满躁动镇静量表的比较:一项观察研究。
背景:量子意识指数(qCON)是一种基于脑电图(EEG)的模式,目前还没有关于重症监护病房(ICU)镇静的研究,但很少有研究描述它可用于评估手术室的麻醉深度。在这项研究中,我们评估了 qCON 与里士满躁动镇静量表(RASS)相比在重症监护室使用机械呼吸机的患者中评估镇静的效果:我们对 87 名年龄在 18 岁至 60 岁之间的机械通气患者进行了为期 12 小时的调查。他们接受了标准化剂量的镇静治疗,包括异丙酚 0.5 毫克/千克和芬太尼 1 微克/千克的栓剂,然后输注异丙酚 2-5 毫克/千克/小时和芬太尼 0.5-2 微克/千克/小时。研究人员使用 qCON 监测器记录 qCON 值,然后评估 RASS 分数:总共获得了 1,218 个读数。将每个 qCON 值与每个 RASS 值的时间进行相应对比后,我们发现它们之间的相关性具有统计学意义(ρ = 0.288,p 结论:qCON 可用于评估机械通气重症患者的镇静水平:CTRI/2019/07/020064.如何引用本文:Harsha MS, Bhatia PK, Sharma A, Sethi P. Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients of Quantium Consciousness Index and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale:一项观察性研究。Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(4):491-495.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
35.70%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing® encourages diversity in approaches to business marketing theory development, research methods, and managerial problem solving. An editorial board comprised of outstanding, internationally recognized scholars and practitioners ensures that the journal maintains impeccable standards of relevance and rigorous scholarship. The Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing features: •basic and applied research that reflects current business marketing theory, methodology, and practice •articles from leading researchers covering topics of mutual interest for the business and academic communities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信