Constitutional Provisions for Right to Education in the Indo-Nepalese Context: Gap between Policy and Practice

Digvijay Singh Pathani, Madan Singh Deupa
{"title":"Constitutional Provisions for Right to Education in the Indo-Nepalese Context: Gap between Policy and Practice","authors":"Digvijay Singh Pathani, Madan Singh Deupa","doi":"10.5296/ije.v14i1.19626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis study aims at comparatively identifying the constitutional provisions for right to education, their implementation and impact on education in India and Nepal. This is an analytical descriptive study based on document analysis. By the mid of 2011, 81% constitutions of the world guaranteed or aspired to protect the right to primary education. Nepal and India both have clear constitutional provisions for right to free and compulsory basic education but are unable to fulfil the international and national educational commitments and goals. India and Nepal fall in 2nd and 48th rank respectively based on population in the world in 2018. However, educational indicators indicate that both the countries could not ensure the educational access to all the children. In the year 2014-15, 22.131 million children were either not enrolled or did not complete primary education in India. This number was 270 958 in Nepal in the same year. Results show that there is a wide gap between the educational policies and their actual implementation in India and Nepal.","PeriodicalId":31806,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Education","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v14i1.19626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractThis study aims at comparatively identifying the constitutional provisions for right to education, their implementation and impact on education in India and Nepal. This is an analytical descriptive study based on document analysis. By the mid of 2011, 81% constitutions of the world guaranteed or aspired to protect the right to primary education. Nepal and India both have clear constitutional provisions for right to free and compulsory basic education but are unable to fulfil the international and national educational commitments and goals. India and Nepal fall in 2nd and 48th rank respectively based on population in the world in 2018. However, educational indicators indicate that both the countries could not ensure the educational access to all the children. In the year 2014-15, 22.131 million children were either not enrolled or did not complete primary education in India. This number was 270 958 in Nepal in the same year. Results show that there is a wide gap between the educational policies and their actual implementation in India and Nepal.
印度-尼泊尔背景下受教育权的宪法规定:政策与实践的差距
摘要本文旨在比较分析印度和尼泊尔两国宪法中关于受教育权的规定及其实施情况以及对教育的影响。这是一项基于文献分析的分析性描述性研究。到2011年年中,世界上81%的宪法保证或希望保护初等教育的权利。尼泊尔和印度都对免费和义务基础教育的权利有明确的宪法规定,但无法履行国际和国家的教育承诺和目标。根据2018年世界人口,印度和尼泊尔分别排在第2和第48位。然而,教育指标表明,这两个国家都不能确保所有儿童都有受教育的机会。2014- 2015年,印度有2213.1万儿童没有入学或没有完成初等教育。同年尼泊尔的这一数字为270 958。结果表明,印度和尼泊尔的教育政策与实际执行存在较大差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书