Evaluating the technique of using MDI and DPI in patients with respiratory disease

Rayas Rucha V, Jagtap Tanmay P, Shyam Ashok K, Sancheti Parag K
{"title":"Evaluating the technique of using MDI and DPI in patients with respiratory disease","authors":"Rayas Rucha V, Jagtap Tanmay P, Shyam Ashok K, Sancheti Parag K","doi":"10.18231/j.ijirm.2021.047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inhalation therapy plays a major role in treatment of respiratory diseases. Correct inhalation technique is crucial for effective clinical outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate and analyse technique of use of Metered Dose Inhaler (MDI) and Dry Powder Inhaler (DPI) in patients with respiratory disease. This observational study was conducted at pulmonary outpatient department of a tertiary care hospital. 30 patients were enrolled using convenience sampling. Participants’ demographic and disease specific data was recorded. Participants were asked to use their inhaler just as they would at home. The technique of device use was observed and recorded using inhaler specific checklists. Data collected was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Out of 30 patients 26 were using MDI, 23 of which (92%) performed at least 1 error. Among 4 patients using DPI, 3 (75%) performed at least 1 error. Patients using MDI for more than 1 year performed less errors compared to those who had been using MDI for less than 1 year, however the difference observed was not significant (n=26, p= 0.304). 29 patients (96%) received education about inhaler device use. The most common incorrectly performed steps were “complete exhalation” and “breath hold.” 92% of MDI and 75% of DPI users made at least one error during the inhalation maneuver despite majority being educated about inhaler technique. The most frequently performed incorrect steps for MDI and DPI were “Complete exhalation” and “Breath hold”.","PeriodicalId":14503,"journal":{"name":"IP Indian Journal of Immunology and Respiratory Medicine","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IP Indian Journal of Immunology and Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijirm.2021.047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inhalation therapy plays a major role in treatment of respiratory diseases. Correct inhalation technique is crucial for effective clinical outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate and analyse technique of use of Metered Dose Inhaler (MDI) and Dry Powder Inhaler (DPI) in patients with respiratory disease. This observational study was conducted at pulmonary outpatient department of a tertiary care hospital. 30 patients were enrolled using convenience sampling. Participants’ demographic and disease specific data was recorded. Participants were asked to use their inhaler just as they would at home. The technique of device use was observed and recorded using inhaler specific checklists. Data collected was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Out of 30 patients 26 were using MDI, 23 of which (92%) performed at least 1 error. Among 4 patients using DPI, 3 (75%) performed at least 1 error. Patients using MDI for more than 1 year performed less errors compared to those who had been using MDI for less than 1 year, however the difference observed was not significant (n=26, p= 0.304). 29 patients (96%) received education about inhaler device use. The most common incorrectly performed steps were “complete exhalation” and “breath hold.” 92% of MDI and 75% of DPI users made at least one error during the inhalation maneuver despite majority being educated about inhaler technique. The most frequently performed incorrect steps for MDI and DPI were “Complete exhalation” and “Breath hold”.
呼吸系统疾病患者应用MDI和DPI技术的评价
吸入疗法在呼吸系统疾病的治疗中起着重要作用。正确的吸入技术是保证临床效果的关键。本研究的目的是评估和分析计量吸入器(MDI)和干粉吸入器(DPI)在呼吸系统疾病患者中的使用技术。本观察性研究在某三级医院肺门诊部进行。采用方便抽样方法纳入30例患者。记录参与者的人口统计和疾病具体数据。参与者被要求像在家一样使用吸入器。使用吸入器特定检查表观察和记录设备使用技术。收集的数据采用描述性统计进行分析。在30例患者中,26例使用MDI,其中23例(92%)至少出现1次错误。在4例使用DPI的患者中,3例(75%)出现至少1次错误。与使用MDI少于1年的患者相比,使用MDI超过1年的患者出现的错误更少,但观察到的差异并不显著(n=26, p= 0.304)。29名患者(96%)接受了有关吸入器使用的教育。最常见的错误步骤是“完全呼气”和“屏气”。“92%的MDI使用者和75%的DPI使用者在吸入操作中至少犯了一次错误,尽管大多数人都接受过吸入器技术的教育。MDI和DPI中最常见的错误步骤是“完全呼气”和“屏气”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信