Evaluation of the Generation of Technofossils by Different Coffee Brewing Methods During COVID-19 Pandemic

Ricardo Soares, Victor Oliveira Santos, Carlos Eduardo Soares Canejo Pinheiro da Cunha, Cleyton Martins da Silva, G. Arbilla, Wilson Machado
{"title":"Evaluation of the Generation of Technofossils by Different Coffee Brewing Methods During COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Ricardo Soares, Victor Oliveira Santos, Carlos Eduardo Soares Canejo Pinheiro da Cunha, Cleyton Martins da Silva, G. Arbilla, Wilson Machado","doi":"10.21577/1984-6835.20220025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coffee is the second most consumed beverage in the world and an important international agricultural commodity, but the increasing use of single-serve coffee machines has led to major environmental concerns, as they produce non-biodegradable solid waste called technofossils, which are considered anthropogenic markers of the technosphere in the Anthropocene. Currently, Brazil is the world's largest coffee producer and the second largest consumer of this beverage. In this study, we evaluated the production of solid waste (biodegradable and technofossil) by the three most commonly used coffee preparation methods in Brazil during the COVID-19 pandemic: the \"Brazilian coffee brewing method\" (with cloth filter), electric coffee machine (with paper filter) and machines using single-serve Keurig Cups (R) (K-Cups). K-Cups produce a total waste mass 56% and 42% higher than those generated by the methods using the \"Brazilian coffee brewing method\" and the electric coffee machine, respectively. The K-Cups produce about 10 times more technofossil waste than the other two methods, but have a nearly equal distribution among all their generated waste (biodegradable: 50.5% and technofossil waste: 49.5%), with no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05). On the other hand, the \"Brazilian coffee brewing method\" and the one using an electric coffee machine, basically produce biodegradable solid waste, predominantly 93.5% for the \"Brazilian coffee brewing method\" and 84.0% for the one using an electric coffee machine, respectively. The technofossil residues generated mainly by the method that uses K-Cups are difficult to recycle, which poses increasing environmental risks if these solid residues are inadequately treated in the environment. This fact is worrisome, since during the COVID-19 pandemic a significant increase in the generation of municipal solid waste (>10%) was observed, as well as a significant increase in coffee consumption in Brazilian and worldwide households.","PeriodicalId":21315,"journal":{"name":"Revista Virtual de Química","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Virtual de Química","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21577/1984-6835.20220025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Coffee is the second most consumed beverage in the world and an important international agricultural commodity, but the increasing use of single-serve coffee machines has led to major environmental concerns, as they produce non-biodegradable solid waste called technofossils, which are considered anthropogenic markers of the technosphere in the Anthropocene. Currently, Brazil is the world's largest coffee producer and the second largest consumer of this beverage. In this study, we evaluated the production of solid waste (biodegradable and technofossil) by the three most commonly used coffee preparation methods in Brazil during the COVID-19 pandemic: the "Brazilian coffee brewing method" (with cloth filter), electric coffee machine (with paper filter) and machines using single-serve Keurig Cups (R) (K-Cups). K-Cups produce a total waste mass 56% and 42% higher than those generated by the methods using the "Brazilian coffee brewing method" and the electric coffee machine, respectively. The K-Cups produce about 10 times more technofossil waste than the other two methods, but have a nearly equal distribution among all their generated waste (biodegradable: 50.5% and technofossil waste: 49.5%), with no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05). On the other hand, the "Brazilian coffee brewing method" and the one using an electric coffee machine, basically produce biodegradable solid waste, predominantly 93.5% for the "Brazilian coffee brewing method" and 84.0% for the one using an electric coffee machine, respectively. The technofossil residues generated mainly by the method that uses K-Cups are difficult to recycle, which poses increasing environmental risks if these solid residues are inadequately treated in the environment. This fact is worrisome, since during the COVID-19 pandemic a significant increase in the generation of municipal solid waste (>10%) was observed, as well as a significant increase in coffee consumption in Brazilian and worldwide households.
COVID-19大流行期间不同咖啡冲泡方法产生技术化石的评价
咖啡是世界上消费量第二大的饮料,也是一种重要的国际农产品,但越来越多地使用单杯咖啡机导致了重大的环境问题,因为它们产生了不可生物降解的固体废物,称为技术化石,这被认为是人类世技术圈的人为标志。目前,巴西是世界上最大的咖啡生产国和第二大咖啡消费国。在这项研究中,我们评估了在COVID-19大流行期间巴西最常用的三种咖啡制备方法产生的固体废物(可生物降解和技术化石):“巴西咖啡冲泡法”(带布过滤器)、电动咖啡机(带纸过滤器)和使用单杯Keurig杯(R) (K-Cups)的机器。与使用“巴西咖啡冲泡法”和电动咖啡机的方法相比,k杯产生的总废物量分别高出56%和42%。K-Cups产生的技术化石废弃物大约是其他两种方法的10倍,但在所有产生的废弃物中分布几乎相等(可生物降解废弃物:50.5%,技术化石废弃物:49.5%),没有统计学上的显著差异(p > 0.05)。另一方面,“巴西咖啡冲泡法”和使用电动咖啡机的方法基本上产生可生物降解的固体废物,“巴西咖啡冲泡法”和使用电动咖啡机的方法产生的固体废物分别占93.5%和84.0%。主要由使用K-Cups的方法产生的技术化石残留物难以回收,如果这些固体残留物在环境中得不到充分处理,则会增加环境风险。这一事实令人担忧,因为在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,观察到城市固体废物产生量大幅增加(10%),巴西和世界各地家庭的咖啡消费量也大幅增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信