Finding words: Aesthetic criticism and television

IF 0.9 2区艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION

Critical Studies in Television Pub Date : 2023-01-30 DOI:10.1177/17496020231154462

James Walters

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Those endorsing or opposing the development of television aesthetics scholarship have exhibited an admirable willingness to reflect upon the rationales and motivations for formulating value judgements. However, very little equivalent attention has been afforded to processes that occur within this area: how scholars conduct analysis and develop claims for achievement in television. In addressing this lack, the following article surveys some of the meanings that ‘criticism’ has encompassed in Television Studies, offering ‘aesthetic criticism’ as a useful term to describe the work of analysis and evaluation, before moving to a series of close readings of aesthetic criticism in practice.

查看原文本刊更多论文

寻找话语:审美批评与电视

那些支持或反对电视美学学术发展的人都表现出一种令人钦佩的意愿，即反思制定价值判断的理由和动机。然而，很少有人对这个领域内发生的过程给予同等的关注:学者如何进行分析并提出对电视成就的主张。为了解决这一不足，下面的文章调查了“批评”在电视研究中所包含的一些含义，提供了“美学批评”作为一个有用的术语来描述分析和评估工作，然后再深入阅读一系列实践中的美学批评。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Critical Studies in Television FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-

CiteScore

2.10

自引率

30.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Critical Studies in Television publishes articles that draw together divergent disciplines and different ways of thinking, to promote and advance television as a distinct academic discipline. It welcomes contributions on any aspect of television—production studies and institutional histories, audience and reception studies, theoretical approaches, conceptual paradigms and pedagogical questions. It continues to invite analyses of the compositional principles and aesthetics of texts, as well as contextual matters relating to both contemporary and past productions. CST also features book reviews, dossiers and debates. The journal is scholarly but accessible, dedicated to generating new knowledge and fostering a dynamic intellectual platform for television studies.