"Patriarchy": A Black Feminist Concept

IF 0.1 4区 艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION
Matty Hemming
{"title":"\"Patriarchy\": A Black Feminist Concept","authors":"Matty Hemming","doi":"10.13110/criticism.63.3.0303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Criticism 63.3_05_Hemming.indd Page 303 12/07/21 6:01 pm Criticism Summer 2021, Vol. 63, No. 3, pp. 303–308. ISSN 0011-1589. doi: 10.13110/criticism.63.3.0303 © 2021 by Wayne State University Press, Detroit, Michigan 48201-1309 The concept of patriarchy inhabits a fraught position within the history of feminist thought. While recent years have seen a resurgence of the term’s use within popular culture, with media coverage of the US-originated women’s march producing headlines such as “The Twenty Best Protest Signs to Dismantle the Patriarchy This Weekend,” the concept has not always held such seemingly evident descriptive appeal. Women of color feminists have long decried the term’s single-issue focus on gender-based inequalities conceptualized within a US-based academy, suggesting that “patriarchy” offers little of use to a more radical, transnational, and context-specific critique of power’s workings. Not so, according to Imani Perry’s Vexy Thing: On Gender and Liberation (2018). In this generative and at times breathtakingly sharp work of interdisciplinary Black feminist theory, Perry argues that not only do we need analyses of “patriarchy” in order to practice feminism, but that the term can be used to do precisely what it has seemed to foreclose: it can account for the “layers of domination” produced by globalized systems of inequality. Responding both to what she regards as the vagueness of current popular usage of the concept, as well as the fraught problematic of its universalizing potentiality, Perry re-tools the term to be simultaneously more specific and more “PATRIARCHY”: A BLACK FEMINIST CONCEPT Matty Hemming","PeriodicalId":42834,"journal":{"name":"FILM CRITICISM","volume":"7 1","pages":"303 - 308"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FILM CRITICISM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13110/criticism.63.3.0303","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Criticism 63.3_05_Hemming.indd Page 303 12/07/21 6:01 pm Criticism Summer 2021, Vol. 63, No. 3, pp. 303–308. ISSN 0011-1589. doi: 10.13110/criticism.63.3.0303 © 2021 by Wayne State University Press, Detroit, Michigan 48201-1309 The concept of patriarchy inhabits a fraught position within the history of feminist thought. While recent years have seen a resurgence of the term’s use within popular culture, with media coverage of the US-originated women’s march producing headlines such as “The Twenty Best Protest Signs to Dismantle the Patriarchy This Weekend,” the concept has not always held such seemingly evident descriptive appeal. Women of color feminists have long decried the term’s single-issue focus on gender-based inequalities conceptualized within a US-based academy, suggesting that “patriarchy” offers little of use to a more radical, transnational, and context-specific critique of power’s workings. Not so, according to Imani Perry’s Vexy Thing: On Gender and Liberation (2018). In this generative and at times breathtakingly sharp work of interdisciplinary Black feminist theory, Perry argues that not only do we need analyses of “patriarchy” in order to practice feminism, but that the term can be used to do precisely what it has seemed to foreclose: it can account for the “layers of domination” produced by globalized systems of inequality. Responding both to what she regards as the vagueness of current popular usage of the concept, as well as the fraught problematic of its universalizing potentiality, Perry re-tools the term to be simultaneously more specific and more “PATRIARCHY”: A BLACK FEMINIST CONCEPT Matty Hemming
“父权制”:黑人女权主义概念
63.3 _05_hemming批评。索引页303 12/07/21下午6:01批评夏季2021,卷63,第3号,第303 - 308。ISSN 0011 - 1589。doi: 10.13110/ critical .63.3.0303©2021 by Wayne State University Press, Detroit, Michigan 48201-1309父权制的概念在女权主义思想史上占据了一个令人担忧的位置。近年来,随着媒体对起源于美国的女性大游行的报道,这个词在流行文化中的使用重新抬头,标题为“本周末拆除父权制的20个最佳抗议标志”,但这个概念并不总是具有如此明显的描述性吸引力。长期以来,有色人种女性女权主义者一直谴责该术语只关注美国学术界概念化的基于性别的不平等,认为“父权制”对于更激进、跨国和具体背景的权力运作批评几乎没有用处。根据伊马尼·佩里的《烦恼的事情:关于性别和解放》(2018),事实并非如此。在这部跨学科黑人女权主义理论的富有创造性的、有时令人惊叹的尖锐作品中,佩里认为,为了实践女权主义,我们不仅需要对“父权制”进行分析,而且这个术语可以用来做它似乎排除的事情:它可以解释由全球化不平等体系产生的“统治层次”。为了回应她所认为的当前流行用法的模糊性,以及其普遍潜力的令人担忧的问题,佩里重新使用了这个术语,使其同时更具体,更“父权制”:黑人女权主义概念马蒂·亨明
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
FILM CRITICISM
FILM CRITICISM FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Film Criticism is a peer-reviewed, online publication whose aim is to bring together scholarship in the field of cinema and media studies in order to present the finest work in this area, foregrounding textual criticism as a primary value. Our readership is academic, although we strive to publish material that is both accessible to undergraduates and engaging to established scholars. With over 40 years of continuous publication, Film Criticism is the third oldest academic film journal in the United States. We have published work by such international scholars as Dudley Andrew, David Bordwell, David Cook, Andrew Horton, Ann Kaplan, Marcia Landy, Peter Lehman, Janet Staiger, and Robin Wood. Equally important, FC continues to present work from emerging generations of film and media scholars representing multiple critical, cultural and theoretical perspectives. Film Criticism is an open access academic journal that allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, and link to the full texts of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose except where otherwise noted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信