The Impact of Legislation and Conventions on Disability Employment Outcomes in Australia

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Peter J. Smith
{"title":"The Impact of Legislation and Conventions on Disability Employment Outcomes in Australia","authors":"Peter J. Smith","doi":"10.1007/s41252-023-00343-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This paper examines the impact of legislation on the employment of people with neurodevelopmental disorders within Australia with reference to the Australian and International Conventions. It examines options for employment support that respect the human rights and dignity of persons with a disability.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>An examination of disability employment data, legislation and policy that underpins disability employment in Australia was conducted. This was compared to outcome data from a select number of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries (OECD) to understand the current state of employment for people with a disability.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Disability employment data highlights little long-term change in employment rates. This is despite significant legislation supporting employment and the rights of persons with a disability to engage in employment. It suggests that legislation does not support policies and practices that promote open employment opportunities and economic citizenship for persons with a disability.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Despite significant government investment to improve employment rates for persons with a disability, there is a disconnect between the legislation, policy and practice methods that supports the rights of persons with a disability to pursue employment justice. Measured against selected data from OECD countries, disability employment falls short of the expectations of people with a disability. There is a need to align disability employment policy and practice to ensure that disability employment systems focus on individual success rather than system outputs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36163,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders","volume":"8 1","pages":"35 - 41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41252-023-00343-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This paper examines the impact of legislation on the employment of people with neurodevelopmental disorders within Australia with reference to the Australian and International Conventions. It examines options for employment support that respect the human rights and dignity of persons with a disability.

Methods

An examination of disability employment data, legislation and policy that underpins disability employment in Australia was conducted. This was compared to outcome data from a select number of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries (OECD) to understand the current state of employment for people with a disability.

Results

Disability employment data highlights little long-term change in employment rates. This is despite significant legislation supporting employment and the rights of persons with a disability to engage in employment. It suggests that legislation does not support policies and practices that promote open employment opportunities and economic citizenship for persons with a disability.

Conclusions

Despite significant government investment to improve employment rates for persons with a disability, there is a disconnect between the legislation, policy and practice methods that supports the rights of persons with a disability to pursue employment justice. Measured against selected data from OECD countries, disability employment falls short of the expectations of people with a disability. There is a need to align disability employment policy and practice to ensure that disability employment systems focus on individual success rather than system outputs.

立法和公约对澳大利亚残疾人就业结果的影响
本文参照澳大利亚公约和国际公约,研究了澳大利亚立法对神经发育障碍患者就业的影响。方法本文对澳大利亚残疾人就业数据、立法和政策进行了研究,并将其与一些选定国家的结果数据进行了比较。结果残疾人就业数据显示就业率长期变化不大。尽管有大量立法支持就业和残疾人就业的权利,但就业率却没有多大变化。结论尽管政府为提高残疾人就业率投入了大量资金,但支持残疾人追求就业公正权利的立法、政策和实践方法之间存在脱节。根据经合组织国家的部分数据进行衡量,残疾人就业率没有达到残疾人的期望值。有必要调整残疾人就业政策和做法,以确保残疾人就业系统注重个人成功而非系统产出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders publishes high-quality research in the broad area of neurodevelopmental disorders across the lifespan. Study participants may include individuals with:Intellectual and developmental disabilitiesGlobal developmental delayCommunication disordersLanguage disordersSpeech sound disordersChildhood-onset fluency disorders (e.g., stuttering)Social (e.g., pragmatic) communication disordersUnspecified communication disordersAutism spectrum disorder (ASD)Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), specified and unspecifiedSpecific learning disordersMotor disordersDevelopmental coordination disordersStereotypic movement disorderTic disorders, specified and unspecifiedOther neurodevelopmental disorders, specified and unspecifiedPapers may also include studies of participants with neurodegenerative disorders that lead to a decline in intellectual functioning, including Alzheimer’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, vascular dementia, Lewy body dementia, frontotemporal dementia, corticobasal degeneration, Huntington’s disease, and progressive supranuclear palsy. The journal includes empirical, theoretical and review papers on a large variety of issues, populations, and domains, including but not limited to: diagnosis; incidence and prevalence; and educational, pharmacological, behavioral and cognitive behavioral, mindfulness, and psychosocial interventions across the life span. Animal models of basic research that inform the understanding and treatment of neurodevelopmental disorders are also welcomed. The journal is multidisciplinary and multi-theoretical, and encourages research from multiple specialties in the social sciences using quantitative and mixed-method research methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信