The proto‐science of consolidology: can it improve the outcome of contemporary efforts at democratization?

P. Schmitter
{"title":"The proto‐science of consolidology: can it improve the outcome of contemporary efforts at democratization?","authors":"P. Schmitter","doi":"10.1080/02589349408705006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The wave of democratization that began in 1974 and that seems to have crested in the mid‐1990s has encouraged the development of two proto‐sciences within political science: transitology and consolidology. This article explores some on the founding principles of the latter with the hope of contributing to the likelihood that more of the over forty polities that have “transited” from various forms of autocracy will succeed in consolidating some type of democracy. It concludes that, despite some unavoidable regressions and the inevitable desencanto (disenchantment), more democracies than ever before will manage to consolidate themselves. However, this very success — far from pressaging “the end of history” — will lead to renewed questioning and criticism of the actual practices of liberal democracy. Democracy consecrated will become democracy contested as we enter the next century.","PeriodicalId":81644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Commonwealth political studies","volume":"12 1","pages":"15-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Commonwealth political studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02589349408705006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

ABSTRACT The wave of democratization that began in 1974 and that seems to have crested in the mid‐1990s has encouraged the development of two proto‐sciences within political science: transitology and consolidology. This article explores some on the founding principles of the latter with the hope of contributing to the likelihood that more of the over forty polities that have “transited” from various forms of autocracy will succeed in consolidating some type of democracy. It concludes that, despite some unavoidable regressions and the inevitable desencanto (disenchantment), more democracies than ever before will manage to consolidate themselves. However, this very success — far from pressaging “the end of history” — will lead to renewed questioning and criticism of the actual practices of liberal democracy. Democracy consecrated will become democracy contested as we enter the next century.
巩固学的原始科学:它能改善当代民主化努力的结果吗?
民主化浪潮始于1974年,似乎在20世纪90年代中期达到顶峰,这一浪潮鼓励了政治学中两种原始科学的发展:过渡学和巩固学。本文探讨了后者的一些基本原则,希望对从各种形式的专制政体“过渡”过来的40多个政体成功巩固某种形式的民主的可能性有所贡献。报告的结论是,尽管出现了一些不可避免的倒退和不可避免的幻灭,但比以往任何时候都更多的民主国家将设法巩固自己。然而,正是这一成功——远非“历史的终结”——将导致对自由民主实际做法的新一轮质疑和批评。当我们进入下一个世纪时,神圣的民主将变成有争议的民主。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信