Observations on the Voynuk Economy in the Filibe and Tatar Pazardzhik Kazas in the 16th – the Beginning of the 17th Centuries

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY
Krastyo Yordanov
{"title":"Observations on the Voynuk Economy in the Filibe and Tatar Pazardzhik Kazas in the 16th – the Beginning of the 17th Centuries","authors":"Krastyo Yordanov","doi":"10.53656/his2022-5-1-obs","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On the basis of several unpublished registers, the article examines the real practice of official Voynuk land ownership. The historical-legal analysis is applied in the research work. According to law, Voynuk farms were exempt from land taxes, but were part of the state land fund. However, the Voynuk baştina differed from the Rayet çiftlik and baştina not only in that it also included vineyards, gardens and even houses, but the sizes of the fields were often smaller than the legal norms for a pair of arable land. This can be explained by the fact that these areas were sufficient for the sustenance of a Voynuk household, since the considered category of population was exempt from land taxes and jizyah. However, as early as the 16th century, a property differentiation was gradually created between the Voynuks and a thin layer of wealthy owners of service lands stood out. They expanded their arable lands both by unregulated means, entering in the timar land, and through perhaps perfectly legal transactions for the transfer of shares of arable land between the Voynuks themselves.","PeriodicalId":40212,"journal":{"name":"Istoriya-History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Istoriya-History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53656/his2022-5-1-obs","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On the basis of several unpublished registers, the article examines the real practice of official Voynuk land ownership. The historical-legal analysis is applied in the research work. According to law, Voynuk farms were exempt from land taxes, but were part of the state land fund. However, the Voynuk baştina differed from the Rayet çiftlik and baştina not only in that it also included vineyards, gardens and even houses, but the sizes of the fields were often smaller than the legal norms for a pair of arable land. This can be explained by the fact that these areas were sufficient for the sustenance of a Voynuk household, since the considered category of population was exempt from land taxes and jizyah. However, as early as the 16th century, a property differentiation was gradually created between the Voynuks and a thin layer of wealthy owners of service lands stood out. They expanded their arable lands both by unregulated means, entering in the timar land, and through perhaps perfectly legal transactions for the transfer of shares of arable land between the Voynuks themselves.
16世纪至17世纪初菲利比和鞑靼帕扎尔日克卡扎斯的沃努克经济观察
根据几份未公布的登记册,本文审查了沃努克官方土地所有权的实际做法。在研究工作中运用了历史法学分析方法。根据法律规定,沃努克农场免征土地税,但属于国家土地基金的一部分。然而,Voynuk ba与Rayet iftlik和ba的不同之处在于,它不仅包括葡萄园、花园甚至房屋,而且田地的大小往往小于一对可耕地的法律规范。这可以解释为这样一个事实,即这些地区足以维持沃努克人的家庭生活,因为所考虑的人口类别免交土地税和jizyah。然而,早在16世纪,沃努克人之间的财产分化逐渐形成,少数富有的服务土地所有者脱颖而出。他们通过不受监管的方式扩张耕地,进入帖木儿土地,或者通过完全合法的交易在沃努克人之间转让耕地份额。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Istoriya-History
Istoriya-History HISTORY-
自引率
50.00%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信