Abstract B004: Capacity development among patient navigators to enhance colorectal cancer control in American Indian-serving healthcare facilities in the U.S. Southwest and Southern Plains
Kevin English, Cheyenne C Jim, J. Hatcher, M. Doescher, Shiraz I. Mishra, P. Lance, D. Rhoades, U. Menon
{"title":"Abstract B004: Capacity development among patient navigators to enhance colorectal cancer control in American Indian-serving healthcare facilities in the U.S. Southwest and Southern Plains","authors":"Kevin English, Cheyenne C Jim, J. Hatcher, M. Doescher, Shiraz I. Mishra, P. Lance, D. Rhoades, U. Menon","doi":"10.1158/1538-7755.disp19-b004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to the Institute of Medicine’s National Cancer Policy Forum, the American Cancer Society, and the National Cancer Institute, cancer screening programs are partly responsible for declining colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality rates in the U.S. Unfortunately, American Indians (AIs) have experienced either no change or an increase in CRC incidence and mortality, disproportionate diagnosis of late stage disease and poorer survival. While, nearly two-thirds of U.S. adults are current with United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines for CRC screening, AI screening rates range from only 28% to 51% in the Southwest and Southern Plains regions. One evidence-based intervention strategy for increasing CRC screening recommended by the Community Preventive Services Task Force (CPSTF) is patient navigation. By offering interpretation, transportation, social support, and culturally and linguistically appropriate education and outreach, patient navigators are able to reduce structural barriers and facilitate access to screening. While researchers have documented effectiveness of patient navigation towards enhancing cancer screening among AI populations, few studies have elucidated best practices for training patient navigators to serve in this capacity. As an effort of the AI CRC Screening Consortium formed by the National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Centers at the Universities of Arizona, New Mexico, and Oklahoma, we trained a cadre of 21 individuals to serve as patients navigators in six unique AI-serving health clinics and communities in Oklahoma, Arizona, and New Mexico. We used a unique blend of didactic and interactive training components (i.e. role playing, games, and group dialogues). The 2.5-day curriculum centered upon a set of nine modules that included digestive system anatomy, USPSTF CRC screening guidelines, stool-based test procedures, direct visualization test procedures, CRC risk factors, CRC diagnosis and treatment, Transtheoretical Model and Motivational Interviewing, and patient navigation tips. A 36-item pre-/post-test was administered to assess the impact of training upon navigator capacity. Paired-sample t-tests were utilized to analyze mean differences in scales measuring two key constructs – CRC-specific knowledge and self-efficacy to engage in CRC control efforts. Evaluation findings demonstrated statistically significance increases in both CRC knowledge scores (pre-test mean = 7.8/12.0 vs. post-test mean 10.9/12.0, p=0.000) and self-efficacy scores (pre-test mean = 3.8/5.0 vs. post-test mean = 4.8/5.0, p=0.001). These findings demonstrate the value of robust capacity development activities with patient navigators prior to intervention as a means of not only increase knowledge about CRC and its associated screenings, but to also engender significant readiness and confidence among patient navigators to integrate CRC control into practice. Citation Format: Kevin C English, Cheyenne Jim, Jennifer Hatcher, Mark P Doescher, Shiraz I Mishra, Peter Lance, Dorothy Rhoades, Usha Menon. Capacity development among patient navigators to enhance colorectal cancer control in American Indian-serving healthcare facilities in the U.S. Southwest and Southern Plains [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2019 Sep 20-23; San Francisco, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020;29(6 Suppl_2):Abstract nr B004.","PeriodicalId":9487,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Biomarkers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Biomarkers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7755.disp19-b004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
According to the Institute of Medicine’s National Cancer Policy Forum, the American Cancer Society, and the National Cancer Institute, cancer screening programs are partly responsible for declining colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality rates in the U.S. Unfortunately, American Indians (AIs) have experienced either no change or an increase in CRC incidence and mortality, disproportionate diagnosis of late stage disease and poorer survival. While, nearly two-thirds of U.S. adults are current with United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines for CRC screening, AI screening rates range from only 28% to 51% in the Southwest and Southern Plains regions. One evidence-based intervention strategy for increasing CRC screening recommended by the Community Preventive Services Task Force (CPSTF) is patient navigation. By offering interpretation, transportation, social support, and culturally and linguistically appropriate education and outreach, patient navigators are able to reduce structural barriers and facilitate access to screening. While researchers have documented effectiveness of patient navigation towards enhancing cancer screening among AI populations, few studies have elucidated best practices for training patient navigators to serve in this capacity. As an effort of the AI CRC Screening Consortium formed by the National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Centers at the Universities of Arizona, New Mexico, and Oklahoma, we trained a cadre of 21 individuals to serve as patients navigators in six unique AI-serving health clinics and communities in Oklahoma, Arizona, and New Mexico. We used a unique blend of didactic and interactive training components (i.e. role playing, games, and group dialogues). The 2.5-day curriculum centered upon a set of nine modules that included digestive system anatomy, USPSTF CRC screening guidelines, stool-based test procedures, direct visualization test procedures, CRC risk factors, CRC diagnosis and treatment, Transtheoretical Model and Motivational Interviewing, and patient navigation tips. A 36-item pre-/post-test was administered to assess the impact of training upon navigator capacity. Paired-sample t-tests were utilized to analyze mean differences in scales measuring two key constructs – CRC-specific knowledge and self-efficacy to engage in CRC control efforts. Evaluation findings demonstrated statistically significance increases in both CRC knowledge scores (pre-test mean = 7.8/12.0 vs. post-test mean 10.9/12.0, p=0.000) and self-efficacy scores (pre-test mean = 3.8/5.0 vs. post-test mean = 4.8/5.0, p=0.001). These findings demonstrate the value of robust capacity development activities with patient navigators prior to intervention as a means of not only increase knowledge about CRC and its associated screenings, but to also engender significant readiness and confidence among patient navigators to integrate CRC control into practice. Citation Format: Kevin C English, Cheyenne Jim, Jennifer Hatcher, Mark P Doescher, Shiraz I Mishra, Peter Lance, Dorothy Rhoades, Usha Menon. Capacity development among patient navigators to enhance colorectal cancer control in American Indian-serving healthcare facilities in the U.S. Southwest and Southern Plains [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2019 Sep 20-23; San Francisco, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020;29(6 Suppl_2):Abstract nr B004.
根据医学研究所的国家癌症政策论坛,美国癌症协会和国家癌症研究所,癌症筛查项目是美国结肠直肠癌(CRC)发病率和死亡率下降的部分原因。不幸的是,美国印第安人(AIs)的CRC发病率和死亡率没有变化或增加,晚期疾病的不成比例的诊断和较差的生存率。虽然近三分之二的美国成年人目前按照美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)的CRC筛查指南进行筛查,但在西南和南部平原地区,人工智能筛查率仅为28%至51%。社区预防服务工作组(CPSTF)推荐的增加结直肠癌筛查的循证干预策略之一是患者导航。通过提供翻译、交通、社会支持以及文化和语言上适当的教育和外展,患者导航员能够减少结构性障碍,促进筛查。虽然研究人员已经记录了患者导航在增强人工智能人群癌症筛查方面的有效性,但很少有研究阐明了培训患者导航员以这种方式服务的最佳实践。作为由亚利桑那大学、新墨西哥大学和俄克拉何马州国立癌症研究所指定癌症中心组成的人工智能CRC筛查联盟的一项努力,我们培训了21名人员,在俄克拉何马州、亚利桑那大学和新墨西哥州的六个独特的人工智能服务健康诊所和社区担任患者导览员。我们使用了一种独特的混合教学和互动训练组件(即角色扮演,游戏和小组对话)。为期2.5天的课程集中在9个模块上,包括消化系统解剖、USPSTF CRC筛查指南、基于粪便的测试程序、直接可视化测试程序、CRC风险因素、CRC诊断和治疗、跨理论模型和动机访谈,以及患者导航技巧。一项36项的前/后测试被用来评估培训对领航员能力的影响。配对样本t检验用于分析测量CRC特异性知识和参与CRC控制工作的自我效能这两个关键结构的量表的平均差异。评估结果显示CRC知识得分(测前平均值= 7.8/12.0,测后平均值= 10.9/12.0,p=0.000)和自我效能得分(测前平均值= 3.8/5.0,测后平均值= 4.8/5.0,p=0.001)均有统计学意义的提高。这些发现证明了在干预前与患者导航员进行强有力的能力发展活动的价值,这不仅是增加对结直肠癌及其相关筛查知识的一种手段,而且还能在患者导航员中产生将结直肠癌控制纳入实践的重大准备和信心。引文格式:Kevin C English, Cheyenne Jim, Jennifer Hatcher, Mark P Doescher, Shiraz I Mishra, Peter Lance, Dorothy Rhoades, Usha Menon。在美国西南和南部平原为美国印第安人服务的医疗机构中,患者导航员的能力发展以加强结直肠癌控制[摘要]。见:第十二届AACR会议论文集:种族/少数民族和医疗服务不足人群的癌症健康差异科学;2019年9月20日至23日;费城(PA): AACR;癌症流行病学杂志,2020;29(6增刊2):摘要nb004。