Specialist in Group Work?

IF 1.6 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Kristopher M. Goodrich
{"title":"Specialist in Group Work?","authors":"Kristopher M. Goodrich","doi":"10.1080/01933922.2021.1985330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“What does it mean to be a specialist in group work?” As the editor of a journal named The Journal for Specialists in Group Work (JSGW), this has become an important question for me for the last four years or so. It is something that I had not questioned deeply before the start of the COVID-19 pandemic but saw as undisputed aspect of my reality. As a member of the Association for Specialists in Group Work (ASGW) I was a specialist, surrounded by other specialists, and each of us focused our lives and work around the groups we were a part of or created. We were also a group unto itself, and as “groupies” (the unofficial nickname of ASGW members) celebrated aspects of group throughout our lives and practice. How could anyone question “group work” or the specialist designation that followed those counted among our ranks? The COVID-19 pandemic provided me a good deal of time to reflect and question, which is something I did across all areas of my life. One question that continued to come up for me, however, had to deal with something that had been an unquestioned and routine part of my academic life. Who is a specialist and, by extension, as we review, edit, and publish articles in our journal, how do we know we are holding true to the needs of our readership who expect to review our pages to deepen their specialist-level understandings of group work? This has also appeared to be a hard question for many of the authors who submit to our journal, many of whom have provided us submissions that have spanned the spectrum of group work. Although I believe our journal’s “aims and scope” page provide some level of detail about how we define group work for the purposes of our journal, we periodically receive submissions from scholars across fields of education (i.e., in relation to teachers assigning tasks in groups to students in K-12 schools or in university settings), social psychology (e.g., in-group and out-group research), political science (i.e., explorations of conflict between two national groups or orientations), etc. that explore non-clinical/counseling forms of group work. As these submissions do not meet what I believe the journal’s intentions are for group work, I have found myself forced to provide desk rejections and comments to authors who send us these manuscripts that address other forms of group work. I always attempt to be kind (or as kind as one can be when providing a rejection disposition) and provide other options for these scholars to disseminate their work. The other form of group work manuscripts that comes to our journal (and comes from scholars both within and outside of our counseling disciplines) involves research about groups, but the manuscripts themselves do not appear focused on the group under exploration (e.g., group dynamics, group leadership, group techniques, etc.). Research is the primary focus of these manuscripts, whereas the group itself appears to either serve as a secondary focus, or unaddressed element. Does research focused on something that happened in a group qualify for publication in JSGW? I would argue no, not necessarily. THE JOURNAL FOR SPECIALISTS IN GROUP WORK 2021, VOL. 46, NO. 4, 291–293 https://doi.org/10.1080/01933922.2021.1985330","PeriodicalId":45501,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Specialists in Group Work","volume":"36 1","pages":"291 - 293"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Specialists in Group Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01933922.2021.1985330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

“What does it mean to be a specialist in group work?” As the editor of a journal named The Journal for Specialists in Group Work (JSGW), this has become an important question for me for the last four years or so. It is something that I had not questioned deeply before the start of the COVID-19 pandemic but saw as undisputed aspect of my reality. As a member of the Association for Specialists in Group Work (ASGW) I was a specialist, surrounded by other specialists, and each of us focused our lives and work around the groups we were a part of or created. We were also a group unto itself, and as “groupies” (the unofficial nickname of ASGW members) celebrated aspects of group throughout our lives and practice. How could anyone question “group work” or the specialist designation that followed those counted among our ranks? The COVID-19 pandemic provided me a good deal of time to reflect and question, which is something I did across all areas of my life. One question that continued to come up for me, however, had to deal with something that had been an unquestioned and routine part of my academic life. Who is a specialist and, by extension, as we review, edit, and publish articles in our journal, how do we know we are holding true to the needs of our readership who expect to review our pages to deepen their specialist-level understandings of group work? This has also appeared to be a hard question for many of the authors who submit to our journal, many of whom have provided us submissions that have spanned the spectrum of group work. Although I believe our journal’s “aims and scope” page provide some level of detail about how we define group work for the purposes of our journal, we periodically receive submissions from scholars across fields of education (i.e., in relation to teachers assigning tasks in groups to students in K-12 schools or in university settings), social psychology (e.g., in-group and out-group research), political science (i.e., explorations of conflict between two national groups or orientations), etc. that explore non-clinical/counseling forms of group work. As these submissions do not meet what I believe the journal’s intentions are for group work, I have found myself forced to provide desk rejections and comments to authors who send us these manuscripts that address other forms of group work. I always attempt to be kind (or as kind as one can be when providing a rejection disposition) and provide other options for these scholars to disseminate their work. The other form of group work manuscripts that comes to our journal (and comes from scholars both within and outside of our counseling disciplines) involves research about groups, but the manuscripts themselves do not appear focused on the group under exploration (e.g., group dynamics, group leadership, group techniques, etc.). Research is the primary focus of these manuscripts, whereas the group itself appears to either serve as a secondary focus, or unaddressed element. Does research focused on something that happened in a group qualify for publication in JSGW? I would argue no, not necessarily. THE JOURNAL FOR SPECIALISTS IN GROUP WORK 2021, VOL. 46, NO. 4, 291–293 https://doi.org/10.1080/01933922.2021.1985330
小组工作专家?
“成为小组工作专家意味着什么?”作为《小组工作专家期刊》(the journal for experts in Group Work, JSGW)的编辑,这个问题在过去四年左右的时间里一直困扰着我。在COVID-19大流行开始之前,我没有对这一点产生过深刻的质疑,但我认为这是我现实中无可争议的一面。作为小组工作专家协会(ASGW)的一员,我是一名专家,周围都是其他专家,我们每个人的生活和工作都围绕着我们所在的或创建的小组。我们也是一个自成一体的团体,作为“追星族”(ASGW成员的非正式昵称),我们在生活和实践中庆祝这个团体的各个方面。怎么会有人质疑“团队工作”或我们队伍中那些人后面的专家称号呢?COVID-19大流行为我提供了大量的时间来反思和质疑,这是我在生活的各个领域所做的事情。然而,有一个问题一直困扰着我,这个问题一直是我学术生活中不容置疑的常规部分。谁是专家,推及开来,当我们在期刊上审查、编辑和发表文章时,我们如何知道我们是在忠实地满足读者的需求,他们希望通过审查我们的页面来加深他们对小组工作的专业水平的理解?对于许多向我们期刊投稿的作者来说,这似乎也是一个很难回答的问题,他们中的许多人向我们提供了跨越小组工作范围的投稿。虽然我相信我们期刊的“目标和范围”页面提供了关于我们如何为期刊定义小组工作的某种程度的细节,但我们定期收到来自教育领域(即,与K-12学校或大学环境中的学生分组分配任务有关的教师),社会心理学(例如,群体内和群体外研究),政治学(即,探索两个民族群体或取向之间的冲突),等,探索非临床/咨询形式的小组工作。由于这些投稿不符合我所认为的期刊的小组工作的意图,我发现自己被迫向向我们发送这些涉及其他形式小组工作的手稿的作者提供书面拒绝和评论。我总是试图表现得善良(或者在提供拒绝处理时尽可能地善良),并为这些学者提供其他选择来传播他们的工作。来自我们期刊的另一种形式的小组工作手稿(来自我们咨询学科内外的学者)涉及对小组的研究,但手稿本身似乎并不关注正在探索的小组(例如,小组动力学,小组领导,小组技巧等)。研究是这些手稿的主要焦点,而群体本身似乎要么作为次要焦点,要么作为未解决的因素。关注群体中发生的事情的研究是否有资格在JSGW上发表?我认为不,不一定。《小组工作专家期刊》2021年第46卷第1期。4,291 - 293 https://doi.org/10.1080/01933922.2021.1985330
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信