National Road Safety Policy in Sweden as Reflected in Plans for Regional Transport Infrastructure

Astrid Värnild, A. Johansson, P. Tillgren
{"title":"National Road Safety Policy in Sweden as Reflected in Plans for Regional Transport Infrastructure","authors":"Astrid Värnild, A. Johansson, P. Tillgren","doi":"10.58235/sjpa.v24i1.8620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1997 the Swedish Parliament adopted the Vision Zero road safety policy, which since 2009 is included in a consideration goal (road safety, environment, health) as one of two goals under an overall transport goal. The target of achieving Vision Zero is not specified for different authorities. Investments in infrastructure are a common way of designing a safe system. Plans for regional transport infrastructure are therefore tools to achieve the national target. \nThe aim of the study is to analyse how Vision Zero has been applied by regional authorities as a term, a goal or a clarification in justifying measures in county plans for regional transport infrastructure in the period 2014–2025 in Sweden. Ten of twenty-one plans were included in the analysis as they selected costs for road safety measures for both state and municipal roads. The plans were analysed using directed and summative content analysis. \nThe consideration goal is rarely in evidence. Measures are most often justified by accessibility and public transport, walking and cycling, as clarifications of the functional goal (accessibility). It is likely that the imbalance between the functional goal and the consideration goal reflects a lack of governance by the Vision Zero road safety policy.Fulfilling a national road safety target requires well-adapted sub-targets for the organizations concerned","PeriodicalId":31772,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58235/sjpa.v24i1.8620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 1997 the Swedish Parliament adopted the Vision Zero road safety policy, which since 2009 is included in a consideration goal (road safety, environment, health) as one of two goals under an overall transport goal. The target of achieving Vision Zero is not specified for different authorities. Investments in infrastructure are a common way of designing a safe system. Plans for regional transport infrastructure are therefore tools to achieve the national target. The aim of the study is to analyse how Vision Zero has been applied by regional authorities as a term, a goal or a clarification in justifying measures in county plans for regional transport infrastructure in the period 2014–2025 in Sweden. Ten of twenty-one plans were included in the analysis as they selected costs for road safety measures for both state and municipal roads. The plans were analysed using directed and summative content analysis. The consideration goal is rarely in evidence. Measures are most often justified by accessibility and public transport, walking and cycling, as clarifications of the functional goal (accessibility). It is likely that the imbalance between the functional goal and the consideration goal reflects a lack of governance by the Vision Zero road safety policy.Fulfilling a national road safety target requires well-adapted sub-targets for the organizations concerned
反映在区域交通基础设施计划中的瑞典国家道路安全政策
1997年,瑞典议会通过了“零道路安全愿景”政策,自2009年以来,该政策作为总体运输目标下的两个目标之一,被纳入审议目标(道路安全、环境、健康)。实现“零愿景”的目标并没有为不同的机构指定。基础设施投资是设计安全系统的一种常见方式。因此,区域运输基础设施计划是实现国家目标的工具。该研究的目的是分析区域当局如何将“零愿景”作为一个术语、一个目标或一个澄清,以证明瑞典2014-2025年期间区域交通基础设施的县计划措施的合理性。21个计划中的10个被纳入分析,因为它们选择了州和市政道路的道路安全措施成本。使用定向和总结性内容分析对方案进行了分析。考虑目标很少是显而易见的。可达性和公共交通、步行和骑自行车等措施通常是合理的,因为它们阐明了功能目标(可达性)。功能目标和考虑目标之间的不平衡很可能反映了“零愿景”道路安全政策缺乏治理。实现国家道路安全目标,需要为有关组织制定适当的分目标
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信