Towards trustworthy multi-modal motion prediction: Holistic evaluation and interpretability of outputs

IF 8.4 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Sandra Carrasco Limeros, Sylwia Majchrowska, Joakim Johnander, Christoffer Petersson, Miguel Ángel Sotelo, David Fernández Llorca
{"title":"Towards trustworthy multi-modal motion prediction: Holistic evaluation and interpretability of outputs","authors":"Sandra Carrasco Limeros,&nbsp;Sylwia Majchrowska,&nbsp;Joakim Johnander,&nbsp;Christoffer Petersson,&nbsp;Miguel Ángel Sotelo,&nbsp;David Fernández Llorca","doi":"10.1049/cit2.12244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Predicting the motion of other road agents enables autonomous vehicles to perform safe and efficient path planning. This task is very complex, as the behaviour of road agents depends on many factors and the number of possible future trajectories can be considerable (multi-modal). Most prior approaches proposed to address multi-modal motion prediction are based on complex machine learning systems that have limited interpretability. Moreover, the metrics used in current benchmarks do not evaluate all aspects of the problem, such as the diversity and admissibility of the output. The authors aim to advance towards the design of trustworthy motion prediction systems, based on some of the requirements for the design of Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence. The focus is on evaluation criteria, robustness, and interpretability of outputs. First, the evaluation metrics are comprehensively analysed, the main gaps of current benchmarks are identified, and a new holistic evaluation framework is proposed. Then, a method for the assessment of spatial and temporal robustness is introduced by simulating noise in the perception system. To enhance the interpretability of the outputs and generate more balanced results in the proposed evaluation framework, an intent prediction layer that can be attached to multi-modal motion prediction models is proposed. The effectiveness of this approach is assessed through a survey that explores different elements in the visualisation of the multi-modal trajectories and intentions. The proposed approach and findings make a significant contribution to the development of trustworthy motion prediction systems for autonomous vehicles, advancing the field towards greater safety and reliability.</p>","PeriodicalId":46211,"journal":{"name":"CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology","volume":"9 3","pages":"557-572"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/cit2.12244","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/cit2.12244","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Predicting the motion of other road agents enables autonomous vehicles to perform safe and efficient path planning. This task is very complex, as the behaviour of road agents depends on many factors and the number of possible future trajectories can be considerable (multi-modal). Most prior approaches proposed to address multi-modal motion prediction are based on complex machine learning systems that have limited interpretability. Moreover, the metrics used in current benchmarks do not evaluate all aspects of the problem, such as the diversity and admissibility of the output. The authors aim to advance towards the design of trustworthy motion prediction systems, based on some of the requirements for the design of Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence. The focus is on evaluation criteria, robustness, and interpretability of outputs. First, the evaluation metrics are comprehensively analysed, the main gaps of current benchmarks are identified, and a new holistic evaluation framework is proposed. Then, a method for the assessment of spatial and temporal robustness is introduced by simulating noise in the perception system. To enhance the interpretability of the outputs and generate more balanced results in the proposed evaluation framework, an intent prediction layer that can be attached to multi-modal motion prediction models is proposed. The effectiveness of this approach is assessed through a survey that explores different elements in the visualisation of the multi-modal trajectories and intentions. The proposed approach and findings make a significant contribution to the development of trustworthy motion prediction systems for autonomous vehicles, advancing the field towards greater safety and reliability.

Abstract Image

实现值得信赖的多模式运动预测:输出的整体评估和可解释性
通过预测其他道路代理的运动轨迹,自动驾驶汽车可以执行安全高效的路径规划。这项任务非常复杂,因为道路代理的行为取决于许多因素,而且未来可能出现的轨迹数量可能相当多(多模式)。之前针对多模式运动预测提出的大多数方法都是基于复杂的机器学习系统,可解释性有限。此外,当前基准中使用的指标并不能评估问题的所有方面,如输出的多样性和可接受性。作者旨在根据可信人工智能设计的一些要求,推进可信运动预测系统的设计。重点是评价标准、鲁棒性和输出的可解释性。首先,对评估指标进行了全面分析,找出了当前基准的主要差距,并提出了一个新的整体评估框架。然后,通过模拟感知系统中的噪声,介绍了一种评估空间和时间鲁棒性的方法。为了提高输出结果的可解释性,并在建议的评估框架中生成更平衡的结果,提出了一个可附加到多模态运动预测模型的意图预测层。通过一项调查,对多模态轨迹和意图可视化中的不同元素进行了探索,从而评估了这种方法的有效性。所提出的方法和研究结果为开发用于自动驾驶汽车的可信运动预测系统做出了重大贡献,推动了该领域向更高安全性和可靠性迈进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology
CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
3.90%
发文量
134
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊介绍: CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology is a leading venue for original research on the theoretical and experimental aspects of artificial intelligence technology. We are a fully open access journal co-published by the Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET) and the Chinese Association for Artificial Intelligence (CAAI) providing research which is openly accessible to read and share worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信