Italian parents’ perception about learning practices and educational effectiveness of remote schooling during the first lockdown

IF 0.4 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS

Qwerty Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.30557/qw000045

M. Gentile, V. Benigno, G. Caruso, Antonella Chifari, Lucia Ferlino, G. Fulantelli, M. Allegra

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The abrupt interruption of face-to-face educational activities imposed by the Italian Government in response to the Covid-19 emergency required a rapid switch to remote schooling to guarantee continuity in education. This paper explores the family’s perception about the organization of remote schooling and its impact on learning. In particular, the authors investigated the technology used and the strategies adopted by the teachers to face the challenges posed by this rapid change in the educational paradigm through an online survey carried out between May and June 2020. More than 19,000 families answered the survey for a total of 32,000 children, highlighting a favorable evaluation from the parents. The analyses confirm that several factors linked to the technology used and instructional learning design signif icantly impacted the parents’ evaluation.

查看原文本刊更多论文

第一次封锁期间意大利家长对远程教育的学习实践和教育效果的看法

意大利政府为应对Covid-19紧急情况而突然中断了面对面的教育活动，这需要迅速转向远程教育，以保证教育的连续性。本文探讨了家庭对远程学校组织的看法及其对学习的影响。特别是，作者通过2020年5月至6月期间进行的在线调查，调查了教师使用的技术和采用的策略，以应对教育范式快速变化带来的挑战。共有1.9万个家庭、3.2万名儿童接受了调查，得到了家长们的好评。分析证实，与使用的技术和教学设计相关的几个因素显著影响了家长的评价。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Qwerty COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-

CiteScore

2.40

自引率

15.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： Qwerty is the commonly accepted name for the computer keyboard, comprising the first six letters of its top row. When typewriters were first introduced, the keys were arranged in alphabetical order. However this order meant that people typed too quickly such that the keys soon became entangled. To counter this, the keys were displayed in random order and typing speeds accordingly slowed down. In later years, despite the fact that the problem of speed had been completely overcome, the keyboard retained its random order. In our view, this represents an excellent metaphor for the entanglement of culture and technological tools. In actual fact, we regard computer-based technologies as cultural artefacts, representing different depths in the daily work and study activity of individuals, social groups, and institutions. We believe that different models of computer use and activity within online environments mediate social interaction. As such, the relationship between culture and technological tools is becoming more and more complex and now provides an opportunity for determining new models of cognitive, psychological, and social interaction. Qwerty hopes to be a place where such issues can be discussed and developed. The journal arises from a growing awareness of the need to develop research and reflection on the impact, effects and nature of technology use and, as such, is intended to be a genuinely cross-disciplinary forum. Qwerty wishes to provide a forum for discussion on the use of new technologies aimed at anyone interested in the use of technology in such fields as education, training, social and university research, including the cultural, social, pedagogical, psychological, economic, professional, ethical and aesthetical aspects of technology use.