David J. Morris , Mohammed O.A.-R. Qutub , A. David Semple
{"title":"Four-year prospective evaluation of immediate early nuclear antigen detection in cell culture for rapid diagnosis of human cytomegalovirus infection","authors":"David J. Morris , Mohammed O.A.-R. Qutub , A. David Semple","doi":"10.1016/S0888-0786(96)01074-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The relative sensitivity of immediate early nuclear antigen detection (IENAD) and conventional cell culture for human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) and the role of the first test in surveillance for infection remain controversial. If all positive results were considered accurate, IENAD and culture gave similar sensitivities [207/284 (73%) vs. 192/284 (68%)] with urines, heparinised bloods, bronchoalveolar lavage fluids, and other clinical specimens. Nonetheless, IENAD could not replace culture, because only the latter identified 77 (27%) of 284 positive samples. The role of IENAD in surveillance for HCMV infection is discussed in the light of low positivity rates with surveillance specimens.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101161,"journal":{"name":"Serodiagnosis and Immunotherapy in Infectious Disease","volume":"8 3","pages":"Pages 173-177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0888-0786(96)01074-8","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Serodiagnosis and Immunotherapy in Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0888078696010748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The relative sensitivity of immediate early nuclear antigen detection (IENAD) and conventional cell culture for human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) and the role of the first test in surveillance for infection remain controversial. If all positive results were considered accurate, IENAD and culture gave similar sensitivities [207/284 (73%) vs. 192/284 (68%)] with urines, heparinised bloods, bronchoalveolar lavage fluids, and other clinical specimens. Nonetheless, IENAD could not replace culture, because only the latter identified 77 (27%) of 284 positive samples. The role of IENAD in surveillance for HCMV infection is discussed in the light of low positivity rates with surveillance specimens.