Influence of Different Drying Techniques on Drying Characteristics and Quality Aspects of Pink Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera) Flowers

D. Lien
{"title":"Influence of Different Drying Techniques on Drying Characteristics and Quality Aspects of Pink Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera) Flowers","authors":"D. Lien","doi":"10.24321/2582.3892.202003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study investigated the effect of different drying methods on the drying kinetics and antioxidant activity of pink lotus flowers to identify the suitable drying models describe the dehydration as well as drying conditions giving minimum loss of antioxidant compounds and antioxidant properties of product. Samples were dried by freeze drying (FD), oven drying (OD) at 40, 50 and 60oC, microwave drying (MWD) with the powers of 140, 420 and 700 W. Drying kinetics from OD and MWD were analyzed mathematically and the dehydration data was statistically analyzed to obtain best fit among all available models basing on coefficient of determinations (R2), reduced chi-square (?2) and root mean square error (RMSE). The dried lotus flowers were analyzed total polyphenol contents (TPC), total flavonoid contents (TFC) and antioxidant activity (AA). It was found that the Midilli et al. model is the most appropriate model for drying behavior of samples by both OD and MWD. The activation energies of drying were 56.29 kJ/mol and 6.48 W/g for OD and MWD, respectively. FD was found to be the best method to give the highest antioxidant activity for lotus flowers and the next one was the OD at 50oC.","PeriodicalId":12403,"journal":{"name":"Food Science and Nutrition","volume":"11 1","pages":"16-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Science and Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24321/2582.3892.202003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The present study investigated the effect of different drying methods on the drying kinetics and antioxidant activity of pink lotus flowers to identify the suitable drying models describe the dehydration as well as drying conditions giving minimum loss of antioxidant compounds and antioxidant properties of product. Samples were dried by freeze drying (FD), oven drying (OD) at 40, 50 and 60oC, microwave drying (MWD) with the powers of 140, 420 and 700 W. Drying kinetics from OD and MWD were analyzed mathematically and the dehydration data was statistically analyzed to obtain best fit among all available models basing on coefficient of determinations (R2), reduced chi-square (?2) and root mean square error (RMSE). The dried lotus flowers were analyzed total polyphenol contents (TPC), total flavonoid contents (TFC) and antioxidant activity (AA). It was found that the Midilli et al. model is the most appropriate model for drying behavior of samples by both OD and MWD. The activation energies of drying were 56.29 kJ/mol and 6.48 W/g for OD and MWD, respectively. FD was found to be the best method to give the highest antioxidant activity for lotus flowers and the next one was the OD at 50oC.
不同干燥工艺对粉荷花干燥特性及品质的影响
本文研究了不同干燥方法对粉莲干燥动力学和抗氧化活性的影响,以确定适合的干燥模型和干燥条件,使产品的抗氧化成分损失最小,抗氧化性能最好。分别采用冷冻干燥(FD)、40、50、60℃的烘箱干燥(OD)和功率为140、420、700 W的微波干燥(MWD)对样品进行干燥。对OD和MWD的干燥动力学进行数学分析,并对脱水数据进行统计分析,以确定系数(R2)、减少卡方(?2)和均方根误差(RMSE)为基础,在所有可用模型中获得最佳拟合。测定荷花干的总多酚含量(TPC)、总黄酮含量(TFC)和抗氧化活性(AA)。研究发现,Midilli等人的模型是最适合样品干燥行为的OD和MWD模型。OD和MWD的干燥活化能分别为56.29 kJ/mol和6.48 W/g。结果表明,FD法对荷花的抗氧化活性最高,其次是OD法,温度为50℃。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信