Bureaucracy across Borders: Administering Cosmopolitan Hospitality at the English P.E.N., 1930–1945

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
E. Ridge
{"title":"Bureaucracy across Borders: Administering Cosmopolitan Hospitality at the English P.E.N., 1930–1945","authors":"E. Ridge","doi":"10.3366/mod.2021.0339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From its inception, hospitality was inscribed in the vision of the English P.E.N., one of its stipulated aims being to provide a ‘vehicle for friendliness and hospitality’. Yet several writers who took leading administrative and representational roles during the 1930s and 1940s – Storm Jameson, E. M. Forster and J. B. Priestley, for example – were uncomfortable with the kinds of hospitality the P.E.N. sometimes purported to offer. They were concerned about the wartime propriety of elaborate lunches, dinners and parties. At the same time, this was an organisation that also tirelessly advocated for more substantial forms of refuge for displaced writers. Drawing on extensive archival material, this essay will examine some of the ambiguities embedded in the P.E.N.’s conception of hospitality during this period: the perceived clash between a social etiquette of hospitality (expressed through P.E.N. social gatherings) and a wider politics of hospitality (expressed in its drive to facilitate refugee reception in Britain).","PeriodicalId":41937,"journal":{"name":"Modernist Cultures","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modernist Cultures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/mod.2021.0339","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From its inception, hospitality was inscribed in the vision of the English P.E.N., one of its stipulated aims being to provide a ‘vehicle for friendliness and hospitality’. Yet several writers who took leading administrative and representational roles during the 1930s and 1940s – Storm Jameson, E. M. Forster and J. B. Priestley, for example – were uncomfortable with the kinds of hospitality the P.E.N. sometimes purported to offer. They were concerned about the wartime propriety of elaborate lunches, dinners and parties. At the same time, this was an organisation that also tirelessly advocated for more substantial forms of refuge for displaced writers. Drawing on extensive archival material, this essay will examine some of the ambiguities embedded in the P.E.N.’s conception of hospitality during this period: the perceived clash between a social etiquette of hospitality (expressed through P.E.N. social gatherings) and a wider politics of hospitality (expressed in its drive to facilitate refugee reception in Britain).
跨国界的官僚主义:管理世界性的款待在英国,1930-1945
从一开始,待客之道就被铭刻在英国体育协会的愿景中,其规定的目标之一是提供“友好和待客之道”。然而,几位在20世纪30年代和40年代担任主要行政和代表角色的作家——例如,斯托姆·詹姆森、e·m·福斯特和j·b·普里斯特利——对P.E.N.有时声称提供的那种热情好客感到不舒服。他们关心的是精致的午餐、晚餐和聚会在战时是否得体。与此同时,这个组织也孜孜不倦地倡导为流离失所的作家提供更实质性的庇护。利用大量的档案材料,本文将研究在这一时期,英国国民警卫队待客概念中嵌入的一些模糊之处:待客的社交礼仪(通过国民警卫队的社交聚会表达)和更广泛的待客政治(在英国促进难民接待的努力中表达)之间的明显冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Modernist Cultures
Modernist Cultures HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信