Comprehensive Five-Year Program Assessment Study

Q4 Social Sciences
T. Crowell, Elizabeth G. Calamidas
{"title":"Comprehensive Five-Year Program Assessment Study","authors":"T. Crowell, Elizabeth G. Calamidas","doi":"10.5325/JASSEINSTEFFE.5.1.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This comprehensive five-year program assessment study illustrates the full circle of the assessment cycle: development, implementation, feedback, and reshaping of curriculum. First, this study provides specific information on the development and implementation of multiple measures of program assessment for both core and track goals and objectives. Second, it provides five years of quantitative and qualitative data illustrating the use of internship e-portfolios and presentations in assessing students’ proficiencies on 13 specific core competencies and numerous track competencies. Data collected from students’ self-rating, faculty’s rating, and Site supervisors’ assessment provide evaluations of students’ performance and levels of preparedness to enter the public health field and indicate high levels of proficiencies for students and support that program and track goals and objectives are being met. Qualitative data support these statistics and provide insight into program needs that are not being met; based on both sets of data, program solutions are identified and implemented creating an assessment feedback loop. Finally, audience feedback from internship presentations provides a final measure of program assessment and also supports the numerous benefits of students attending these events. Results of all these measures provide valuable insight into future program and course curriculum, along with teaching strategies and techniques in order to increase student learning.","PeriodicalId":56185,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness","volume":"4 1","pages":"1 - 33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/JASSEINSTEFFE.5.1.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This comprehensive five-year program assessment study illustrates the full circle of the assessment cycle: development, implementation, feedback, and reshaping of curriculum. First, this study provides specific information on the development and implementation of multiple measures of program assessment for both core and track goals and objectives. Second, it provides five years of quantitative and qualitative data illustrating the use of internship e-portfolios and presentations in assessing students’ proficiencies on 13 specific core competencies and numerous track competencies. Data collected from students’ self-rating, faculty’s rating, and Site supervisors’ assessment provide evaluations of students’ performance and levels of preparedness to enter the public health field and indicate high levels of proficiencies for students and support that program and track goals and objectives are being met. Qualitative data support these statistics and provide insight into program needs that are not being met; based on both sets of data, program solutions are identified and implemented creating an assessment feedback loop. Finally, audience feedback from internship presentations provides a final measure of program assessment and also supports the numerous benefits of students attending these events. Results of all these measures provide valuable insight into future program and course curriculum, along with teaching strategies and techniques in order to increase student learning.
综合五年计划评估研究
这项全面的五年课程评估研究说明了评估周期的完整循环:课程的开发、实施、反馈和重塑。首先,本研究为核心目标和跟踪目标提供了关于开发和实施多种方案评估措施的具体信息。其次,它提供了五年的定量和定性数据,说明了实习电子档案和演示在评估学生对13个特定核心能力和众多跟踪能力的熟练程度方面的使用。从学生的自我评价、教师的评价和现场主管的评估中收集的数据提供了对学生的表现和进入公共卫生领域的准备水平的评估,并表明学生的熟练程度很高,并支持项目和跟踪目标的实现。定性数据支持这些统计数据,并提供未被满足的项目需求的洞察力;基于这两组数据,确定并实现了程序解决方案,从而创建了评估反馈循环。最后,来自实习报告的观众反馈提供了项目评估的最终衡量标准,也支持了学生参加这些活动的众多好处。所有这些措施的结果为未来的项目和课程设置提供了有价值的见解,以及教学策略和技术,以提高学生的学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness publishes scholarly work on the assessment of student learning at the course, program, institutional, and multi-institutional levels as well as more broadly focused scholarship on institutional effectiveness in relation to mission and emerging directions in higher education assessment. JAIE is the official publication of the New England Educational Assessment Network, established in 1995 and recognized as one of the leaders in supporting best practices and resources in educational assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信