Perspectives and Challenges in Molecular-Based Diagnostics and Personalized Treatment for Recurrent High-Grade Gliomas

D. Kalasauskas, M. Renovanz, Sven-Ernö Bikár, A. Buzdin, A. Enam, S. Kantelhardt, A. Giese, Ella L. Kim
{"title":"Perspectives and Challenges in Molecular-Based Diagnostics and Personalized Treatment for Recurrent High-Grade Gliomas","authors":"D. Kalasauskas, M. Renovanz, Sven-Ernö Bikár, A. Buzdin, A. Enam, S. Kantelhardt, A. Giese, Ella L. Kim","doi":"10.4172/2157-2518.1000290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Glioblastoma is the most common and most malignant type of intrinsic brain tumor in adults. The standard of care for glioblastoma consists of surgical debulking followed by combined radiochemotherapy. The clinical efficacy of standard therapies for newly diagnosed glioblastomas is rather modest with the highest survival rate at 5-years being less than 10%. Inevitable recurrence after cytotoxic therapies poses the major challenge in the clinical management of high grade gliomas. For recurrent glioblastomas, there is no standard therapy with lack of level one evidence for treatment efficacy. Recent evidence indicates that post-therapy recurrence in gliomas is a consequence of a plethora of molecular and cellular factors including intratumoural heterogeneity, functional hierarchy of distinct types of glioma cells, dynamic changes in the molecular landscapes and cellular composition of the tumour during therapy and the impact of particular treatment modalities. There is an emerging consensus that molecular distinctions within and between individual tumours is an important factor determining clinical outcomes. Consequently, integrated approaches based on the combination of molecular profiling with traditional methods such as immunohistochemical phenotyping, karyotyping and/or non-quantitative methylation-specific PCR have emerged as a promising venue towards increasing the predictive value of diagnostics for malignant brain tumors. The high level of inter-and intra-tumoural molecular diversity in gliomas underscores the need of integrating high throughput molecular profiling and pharmacogenomics into a diagnostic paradigm for gliomas and raises the possibility that molecular-instructed personalized treatments may provide clinical benefit to patients with glioblastoma, particularly in the setting of post-treatment recurrence. Here we discuss potential prospects and challenges of patient-tailored diagnostics and personalized treatment strategies for recurrent glioblastomas.","PeriodicalId":15209,"journal":{"name":"Journal of carcinogenesis & mutagenesis","volume":"20 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of carcinogenesis & mutagenesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-2518.1000290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Glioblastoma is the most common and most malignant type of intrinsic brain tumor in adults. The standard of care for glioblastoma consists of surgical debulking followed by combined radiochemotherapy. The clinical efficacy of standard therapies for newly diagnosed glioblastomas is rather modest with the highest survival rate at 5-years being less than 10%. Inevitable recurrence after cytotoxic therapies poses the major challenge in the clinical management of high grade gliomas. For recurrent glioblastomas, there is no standard therapy with lack of level one evidence for treatment efficacy. Recent evidence indicates that post-therapy recurrence in gliomas is a consequence of a plethora of molecular and cellular factors including intratumoural heterogeneity, functional hierarchy of distinct types of glioma cells, dynamic changes in the molecular landscapes and cellular composition of the tumour during therapy and the impact of particular treatment modalities. There is an emerging consensus that molecular distinctions within and between individual tumours is an important factor determining clinical outcomes. Consequently, integrated approaches based on the combination of molecular profiling with traditional methods such as immunohistochemical phenotyping, karyotyping and/or non-quantitative methylation-specific PCR have emerged as a promising venue towards increasing the predictive value of diagnostics for malignant brain tumors. The high level of inter-and intra-tumoural molecular diversity in gliomas underscores the need of integrating high throughput molecular profiling and pharmacogenomics into a diagnostic paradigm for gliomas and raises the possibility that molecular-instructed personalized treatments may provide clinical benefit to patients with glioblastoma, particularly in the setting of post-treatment recurrence. Here we discuss potential prospects and challenges of patient-tailored diagnostics and personalized treatment strategies for recurrent glioblastomas.
复发性高级别胶质瘤分子诊断和个性化治疗的前景和挑战
胶质母细胞瘤是成人最常见和最恶性的内在脑肿瘤。胶质母细胞瘤的标准治疗包括手术切除和联合放化疗。对于新诊断的胶质母细胞瘤,标准疗法的临床疗效相当有限,最高5年生存率不到10%。细胞毒治疗后不可避免的复发是高级别胶质瘤临床治疗的主要挑战。对于复发性胶质母细胞瘤,没有标准的治疗方法,缺乏一级证据证明治疗效果。最近的证据表明,胶质瘤治疗后复发是多种分子和细胞因素的结果,包括肿瘤内异质性、不同类型胶质瘤细胞的功能层次、治疗期间肿瘤分子景观和细胞组成的动态变化以及特定治疗方式的影响。有一个正在形成的共识,即单个肿瘤内部和之间的分子差异是决定临床结果的重要因素。因此,基于分子谱分析与传统方法(如免疫组织化学表型分型、核型和/或非定量甲基化特异性PCR)相结合的综合方法已成为提高恶性脑肿瘤诊断预测价值的有希望的途径。胶质瘤中肿瘤间和肿瘤内的高水平分子多样性强调了将高通量分子谱分析和药物基因组学整合到胶质瘤诊断范式中的必要性,并提出了分子指导个性化治疗可能为胶质瘤患者提供临床益处的可能性,特别是在治疗后复发的情况下。在这里,我们讨论了针对复发性胶质母细胞瘤患者量身定制的诊断和个性化治疗策略的潜在前景和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信