Does antioxidant potential of traditional rice varieties vary with processing?

T. Thennakoon, S. Ekanayake
{"title":"Does antioxidant potential of traditional rice varieties vary with processing?","authors":"T. Thennakoon, S. Ekanayake","doi":"10.4038/ijms.v8i2.144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Antioxidants protect cells and tissues from free radical damage and therefore, are important in the prevention and management of a variety of chronic diseases. Bran of pigmented rice are potent sources of naturally occurring antioxidants. Rice being the staple diet of Sri Lankans and traditional rice gaining more attention at present, investigating the effect of processing and cooking on total phenol content and antioxidant potentials of selected traditional rice varieties were the aims of this study. Differently processed (raw undermilled, raw polished [4%] and parboiled undermilled) six rice varieties, namely, Godaheenati, Batapola el, Dik wee, Dahanala, Unakola samba and, Hangimuththan were used in the study. The antioxidant properties of rice flour extracted with phosphate buffer solution (PBS) were determined by 2,2’-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) radical scavenging activity, 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazine (DPPH) radical scavenging activity and, ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP)assays. Moreover, the total polyphenolic content (TPC) of differently processed rice was analysed. Mean TPC of both uncooked and cooked, raw polished rice was the least (4.9-6.1 mg GAE/g) followed by parboiled (4.9-6.1 mg GAE/g). The highest TPC was in raw (5.3-6.7 mg GAE/g) rice. Mean ABTS activity of raw polished rice (0.8-1.9 mg TE/g) was the least followed by parboiled (1.2- 2.3 mg TE/g) and raw rice (1.3-2.1 mg TE/g). Mean DPPH scavenging and FRAP activities followed the same pattern with raw rice having the highest (4.5-6.2 mg AE/100g; 4.6-14.4 mg AE/100g) followed by parboiled (4.4-5.1 mg AE/100g); 5.0-15.2 mg AE/100g) and the least in raw polished (4.0-4.6 mg AE/100g; 5.1-18.5 mg AE/100g) respectively. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant potential increased in the order of raw polished, parboiled, and raw rice flour in both cooked and uncooked rice. Rice grains with red coloured bran produced higher antioxidant activity compared to varieties with white bran. However, cooking reduced the antioxidant potentials in all differently processed varieties.","PeriodicalId":91884,"journal":{"name":"International journal of current multidisciplinary studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of current multidisciplinary studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/ijms.v8i2.144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Antioxidants protect cells and tissues from free radical damage and therefore, are important in the prevention and management of a variety of chronic diseases. Bran of pigmented rice are potent sources of naturally occurring antioxidants. Rice being the staple diet of Sri Lankans and traditional rice gaining more attention at present, investigating the effect of processing and cooking on total phenol content and antioxidant potentials of selected traditional rice varieties were the aims of this study. Differently processed (raw undermilled, raw polished [4%] and parboiled undermilled) six rice varieties, namely, Godaheenati, Batapola el, Dik wee, Dahanala, Unakola samba and, Hangimuththan were used in the study. The antioxidant properties of rice flour extracted with phosphate buffer solution (PBS) were determined by 2,2’-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) radical scavenging activity, 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazine (DPPH) radical scavenging activity and, ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP)assays. Moreover, the total polyphenolic content (TPC) of differently processed rice was analysed. Mean TPC of both uncooked and cooked, raw polished rice was the least (4.9-6.1 mg GAE/g) followed by parboiled (4.9-6.1 mg GAE/g). The highest TPC was in raw (5.3-6.7 mg GAE/g) rice. Mean ABTS activity of raw polished rice (0.8-1.9 mg TE/g) was the least followed by parboiled (1.2- 2.3 mg TE/g) and raw rice (1.3-2.1 mg TE/g). Mean DPPH scavenging and FRAP activities followed the same pattern with raw rice having the highest (4.5-6.2 mg AE/100g; 4.6-14.4 mg AE/100g) followed by parboiled (4.4-5.1 mg AE/100g); 5.0-15.2 mg AE/100g) and the least in raw polished (4.0-4.6 mg AE/100g; 5.1-18.5 mg AE/100g) respectively. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant potential increased in the order of raw polished, parboiled, and raw rice flour in both cooked and uncooked rice. Rice grains with red coloured bran produced higher antioxidant activity compared to varieties with white bran. However, cooking reduced the antioxidant potentials in all differently processed varieties.
传统水稻品种的抗氧化能力是否随加工过程而变化?
抗氧化剂保护细胞和组织免受自由基损伤,因此,在预防和管理各种慢性疾病中很重要。有色米的麸皮是天然抗氧化剂的有效来源。水稻是斯里兰卡人的主食,传统水稻也越来越受到重视,研究加工和蒸煮对传统水稻品种总酚含量和抗氧化能力的影响是本研究的目的。研究中使用了六种不同加工方式(未经碾磨、未经抛光[4%]和半煮未碾磨)的大米品种,即Godaheenati、Batapola el、Dik wee、Dahanala、Unakola samba和Hangimuththan。采用磷酸缓冲液(PBS)提取的米粉,通过2,2′-氮基-双(3-乙基苯并噻唑-6-磺酸)(ABTS)自由基清除能力、1,1-二苯基-2-吡啶肼(DPPH)自由基清除能力和铁还原抗氧化能力(FRAP)测定其抗氧化性能。并对不同加工方式大米的总多酚含量进行了分析。生精米和熟精米的平均TPC最低(4.9-6.1 mg GAE/g),其次是煮熟的米(4.9-6.1 mg GAE/g)。TPC以生米最高(5.3 ~ 6.7 mg GAE/g)。粗精米(0.8 ~ 1.9 mg TE/g)的平均ABTS活性最低,其次是半熟米(1.2 ~ 2.3 mg TE/g)和粗米(1.3 ~ 2.1 mg TE/g)。平均DPPH清除率和FRAP活性均以糙米最高(4.5 ~ 6.2 mg AE/100g;4.6 ~ 14.4 mg AE/100g),其次是半煮(4.4 ~ 5.1 mg AE/100g);5.0-15.2 mg AE/100g),生料中AE最少(4.0-4.6 mg AE/100g;5.1 ~ 18.5 mg AE/100g)。熟米和生米中酚类化合物和抗氧化潜力依次增加,依次为生磨米、半煮米和生米粉。红色米糠比白色米糠具有更高的抗氧化活性。然而,烹饪降低了所有不同加工品种的抗氧化能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信