Some critical remarks on the epistemology of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)

A. Métraux, S. Frisch
{"title":"Some critical remarks on the epistemology of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)","authors":"A. Métraux, S. Frisch","doi":"10.23756/SP.V8I1.493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines epistemological and ontological underpinnings of reasearch performed by means of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). It takes as its guiding line the important distinction between instruments and apparatuses drawn by Rom Harre. According to Harre, instruments such as barometers or thermometers do not cause the states they measure into existence. Apparatuses, in contradistinction, cause material states into existence to begin with, whereby theses states are subsequently processed (treated, measured, etc.) according to suitable methods (e.g. algorithms). Thus, when the objects of examination (human and animal brains, e.g.) are subjected to 2 or more Tesla in fMRI, a strength of magnetic field never occuring in earthly nature, technical means literally create the states to be examined (measured, graphically represented, etc.). Close examination of the functioning of MRI and fMRI indicates that brain states, e.g., are not simply read, or perceived (on screens) as degrees of temperature are read on scale. Hence, one does not see any mental funtion when looking at fMRI outputs, for the visible output has been semantically processed on the basis of invisible quantum mechanical processes that have undergone translations into digital data caused by the fMRI device itself.","PeriodicalId":31494,"journal":{"name":"Science Philosophy","volume":"116 1","pages":"63-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23756/SP.V8I1.493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article examines epistemological and ontological underpinnings of reasearch performed by means of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). It takes as its guiding line the important distinction between instruments and apparatuses drawn by Rom Harre. According to Harre, instruments such as barometers or thermometers do not cause the states they measure into existence. Apparatuses, in contradistinction, cause material states into existence to begin with, whereby theses states are subsequently processed (treated, measured, etc.) according to suitable methods (e.g. algorithms). Thus, when the objects of examination (human and animal brains, e.g.) are subjected to 2 or more Tesla in fMRI, a strength of magnetic field never occuring in earthly nature, technical means literally create the states to be examined (measured, graphically represented, etc.). Close examination of the functioning of MRI and fMRI indicates that brain states, e.g., are not simply read, or perceived (on screens) as degrees of temperature are read on scale. Hence, one does not see any mental funtion when looking at fMRI outputs, for the visible output has been semantically processed on the basis of invisible quantum mechanical processes that have undergone translations into digital data caused by the fMRI device itself.
对功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)认识论的几点批判
本文考察了通过磁共振成像(MRI)和功能磁共振成像(fMRI)进行的研究的认识论和本体论基础。它以罗姆·哈尔(Rom Harre)对仪器和器具的重要区分为指导方针。根据Harre的说法,诸如气压计或温度计之类的仪器不会导致它们所测量的状态的存在。相反,仪器首先引起物质状态的存在,然后根据适当的方法(例如算法)对这些状态进行处理(处理、测量等)。因此,当被检查对象(例如人类和动物的大脑)在功能磁共振成像中受到2特斯拉或更多的磁场强度时,技术手段确实创造了要检查的状态(测量,图形表示等)。对核磁共振成像和功能磁共振成像功能的仔细检查表明,大脑状态,例如,不是简单地读取,或感知(在屏幕上),因为温度是在刻度上读取的。因此,在观察功能磁共振成像输出时,人们看不到任何心理功能,因为可见的输出已经在不可见的量子力学过程的基础上进行了语义处理,这些过程已经被转换成由功能磁共振成像设备本身引起的数字数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信