Scientific and Regulatory Policy Committee Points to Consider: Primary Digital Histopathology Evaluation and Peer Review for Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) Nonclinical Toxicology Studies

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PATHOLOGY
T. Forest, F. Aeffner, D. Bangari, B. Bawa, Jonathan Carter, J. Fikes, Wanda High, S. Hayashi, M. Jacobsen, LuAnn Mckinney, D. Rudmann, T. Steinbach, V. Schumacher, Oliver C. Turner, J. Ward, C. Willson
{"title":"Scientific and Regulatory Policy Committee Points to Consider: Primary Digital Histopathology Evaluation and Peer Review for Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) Nonclinical Toxicology Studies","authors":"T. Forest, F. Aeffner, D. Bangari, B. Bawa, Jonathan Carter, J. Fikes, Wanda High, S. Hayashi, M. Jacobsen, LuAnn Mckinney, D. Rudmann, T. Steinbach, V. Schumacher, Oliver C. Turner, J. Ward, C. Willson","doi":"10.1177/01926233221099273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Society of Toxicologic Pathology’s Scientific and Regulatory Policy Committee formed a working group to consider the present and future use of digital pathology in toxicologic pathology in general and specifically its use in primary evaluation and peer review in Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) environments. Digital histopathology systems can save costs by reducing travel, enhancing organizational flexibility, decreasing slide handling, improving collaboration, increasing access to historical images, and improving quality and efficiency through integration with laboratory information management systems. However, the resources to implement and operate a digital pathology system can be significant. Given the magnitude and risks involved in the decision to adopt digital histopathology, this working group used pertinent previously published survey results and its members’ expertise to create a Points-to-Consider article to assist organizations with building and implementing digital pathology workflows. With the aim of providing a comprehensive perspective, the current publication summarizes aspects of digital whole-slide imaging relevant to nonclinical histopathology evaluations, and then presents points to consider applicable to both primary digital histopathology evaluation and digital peer review in GLP toxicology studies. The Supplemental Appendices provide additional tabulated resources.","PeriodicalId":23113,"journal":{"name":"Toxicologic Pathology","volume":"52 1","pages":"531 - 543"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicologic Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01926233221099273","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Society of Toxicologic Pathology’s Scientific and Regulatory Policy Committee formed a working group to consider the present and future use of digital pathology in toxicologic pathology in general and specifically its use in primary evaluation and peer review in Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) environments. Digital histopathology systems can save costs by reducing travel, enhancing organizational flexibility, decreasing slide handling, improving collaboration, increasing access to historical images, and improving quality and efficiency through integration with laboratory information management systems. However, the resources to implement and operate a digital pathology system can be significant. Given the magnitude and risks involved in the decision to adopt digital histopathology, this working group used pertinent previously published survey results and its members’ expertise to create a Points-to-Consider article to assist organizations with building and implementing digital pathology workflows. With the aim of providing a comprehensive perspective, the current publication summarizes aspects of digital whole-slide imaging relevant to nonclinical histopathology evaluations, and then presents points to consider applicable to both primary digital histopathology evaluation and digital peer review in GLP toxicology studies. The Supplemental Appendices provide additional tabulated resources.
科学和监管政策委员会考虑的要点:良好实验室规范(GLP)非临床毒理学研究的初级数字组织病理学评估和同行评审
毒理学病理学学会的科学和监管政策委员会成立了一个工作组,以考虑数字病理学在毒理学病理学中的一般应用,特别是在良好实验室规范(GLP)环境中的初步评估和同行评审中的应用。数字组织病理学系统可以通过减少差旅、增强组织灵活性、减少幻灯片处理、改善协作、增加对历史图像的访问以及通过与实验室信息管理系统集成提高质量和效率来节省成本。然而,实施和操作数字病理系统的资源可能是重要的。考虑到决定采用数字组织病理学所涉及的规模和风险,该工作组使用相关的先前发表的调查结果及其成员的专业知识创建了一篇文章,以帮助组织建立和实施数字病理学工作流程。为了提供一个全面的视角,本出版物总结了与非临床组织病理学评估相关的数字全片成像方面,然后提出了适用于GLP毒理学研究中初级数字组织病理学评估和数字同行评审的要点。补充附录提供了额外的表格资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Toxicologic Pathology
Toxicologic Pathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Toxicologic Pathology is dedicated to the promotion of human, animal, and environmental health through the dissemination of knowledge, techniques, and guidelines to enhance the understanding and practice of toxicologic pathology. Toxicologic Pathology, the official journal of the Society of Toxicologic Pathology, will publish Original Research Articles, Symposium Articles, Review Articles, Meeting Reports, New Techniques, and Position Papers that are relevant to toxicologic pathology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信