The Demise of Effects-based Resource Management

IF 0.1 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
K. Counsell
{"title":"The Demise of Effects-based Resource Management","authors":"K. Counsell","doi":"10.26686/pq.v19i1.8104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A core principle underlying the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) is that of effects based resource management: managing the effects of activities on the environment, rather than the activities themselves. In economics parlance, this has strong links to the concept of internalising the externality, where the costs or benefits of activities are borne by those undertaking the activities, rather than by third parties. When externalities are internalised, society’s wellbeing is improved. However, the widely held view is that the RMA has not made society any better off. A contributor to this was the poor implementation of the internalisation principle in the RMA, particularly the limited use of price signals, high transaction costs, and the poor application of cost–benefit analysis. The replacement for the RMA, the Natural and Built Environment Act (NBEA), proposes to shift the focus away from an effects based approach to an outcomes-based one. While the NBEA could be used to better implement an internalisation principle, its proposed drafting does not always attempt to do so, and its explicit shift to an outcomes-based approach is likely to make it even more difficult for externalities to be internalised.","PeriodicalId":43642,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Policy Quarterly","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Policy Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26686/pq.v19i1.8104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A core principle underlying the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) is that of effects based resource management: managing the effects of activities on the environment, rather than the activities themselves. In economics parlance, this has strong links to the concept of internalising the externality, where the costs or benefits of activities are borne by those undertaking the activities, rather than by third parties. When externalities are internalised, society’s wellbeing is improved. However, the widely held view is that the RMA has not made society any better off. A contributor to this was the poor implementation of the internalisation principle in the RMA, particularly the limited use of price signals, high transaction costs, and the poor application of cost–benefit analysis. The replacement for the RMA, the Natural and Built Environment Act (NBEA), proposes to shift the focus away from an effects based approach to an outcomes-based one. While the NBEA could be used to better implement an internalisation principle, its proposed drafting does not always attempt to do so, and its explicit shift to an outcomes-based approach is likely to make it even more difficult for externalities to be internalised.
基于效果的资源管理的消亡
《1991年资源管理法》(RMA)的核心原则是基于效果的资源管理:管理活动对环境的影响,而不是活动本身。用经济学的说法,这与外部性内部化的概念有很强的联系,即活动的成本或收益由从事活动的人承担,而不是由第三方承担。当外部性内部化时,社会的福祉就会得到改善。然而,广泛持有的观点是,军事革命并没有使社会变得更好。造成这种情况的原因之一是军事革命中内部化原则执行不力,特别是价格信号使用有限,交易成本高,成本效益分析应用不力。取代《军事革命》的《自然与建筑环境法》(NBEA)提议将重点从基于效果的方法转移到基于结果的方法。虽然NBEA可以用来更好地实施内部化原则,但其拟议草案并不总是试图这样做,而且它明确转向以结果为基础的方法,可能会使外部性内部化变得更加困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Turkish Policy Quarterly
Turkish Policy Quarterly POLITICAL SCIENCE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信