The Book of Genesis in the Complete Chronographic Palaea and the Trinity Pentateuchs No. 1 and No. 45

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Slovene-International Journal of Slavic Studies Pub Date : 2020-12-25 DOI:10.31168/2305-6754.2020.9.2.5

T. Vilkul

{"title":"The Book of Genesis in the Complete Chronographic Palaea and the Trinity Pentateuchs No. 1 and No. 45","authors":"T. Vilkul","doi":"10.31168/2305-6754.2020.9.2.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some parts of the Complete Chronographic Palaea contain fragments of an Old Slavonic translation of the Bible, which was intended for personal home or monastic reading ( chetij in Old Slavonic). The origin of this translation has not received much scholarly attention so far. The main purpose of this paper is to identify the version of the Book of Genesis used in the Palaea by comparing the textual traditions of the Slavonic Pentateuch, Octateuch and chronographs. The Complete Сhronographic Palaea is one of the Old Russian compilations containing both the Old Testament translations and chronographic sources. Its biblical part is built on the material of the Palaea Interpretata , as well as on the Slavonic “chetij” biblical translation, while the chronographic part has excerpts from the translated Byzantine chronicles after the version of the so-called Chronograph po velikomu izlozheniju with additions. Overall, the manuscript tradition of the Slavonic Octateuch includes three families. While interpolations from the Genesis in the Complete Palaea reveal little resemblance to two of them, namely, Russian and South Slavic recensions, we see dozens overlaps with the group of the Trinity Pentateuchs (Russian State Library, f.304. I, No.1 and No.45). The text of this group belongs to the third, Chronographic recension of the “chetij” Octateuch with specific features covering dozens of examples of identical innovations. However, some discrepancies with the Trinity Pentateuchs and convergence with the original readings preserved in two other recensions show that the compiler of the Complete Palaea was dealing with an earlier common protographe. The Chronographic recension itself was divided into two groups (Trinity Pentateuchs and Iudejsky Chronograph ) approximately in the late 1100s or early 1200s and is now represented by only five manuscripts. Therefore, the evidence of the Complete Chronographic Palaea is important both for the textual analysis of the Old Slavonic biblical translations and for the history of the Old Russian chronographs as well. DOI: 10.31168/2305-6754.2020.9.2.5","PeriodicalId":42189,"journal":{"name":"Slovene-International Journal of Slavic Studies","volume":"31 1","pages":"129-148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Slovene-International Journal of Slavic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31168/2305-6754.2020.9.2.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Some parts of the Complete Chronographic Palaea contain fragments of an Old Slavonic translation of the Bible, which was intended for personal home or monastic reading ( chetij in Old Slavonic). The origin of this translation has not received much scholarly attention so far. The main purpose of this paper is to identify the version of the Book of Genesis used in the Palaea by comparing the textual traditions of the Slavonic Pentateuch, Octateuch and chronographs. The Complete Сhronographic Palaea is one of the Old Russian compilations containing both the Old Testament translations and chronographic sources. Its biblical part is built on the material of the Palaea Interpretata , as well as on the Slavonic “chetij” biblical translation, while the chronographic part has excerpts from the translated Byzantine chronicles after the version of the so-called Chronograph po velikomu izlozheniju with additions. Overall, the manuscript tradition of the Slavonic Octateuch includes three families. While interpolations from the Genesis in the Complete Palaea reveal little resemblance to two of them, namely, Russian and South Slavic recensions, we see dozens overlaps with the group of the Trinity Pentateuchs (Russian State Library, f.304. I, No.1 and No.45). The text of this group belongs to the third, Chronographic recension of the “chetij” Octateuch with specific features covering dozens of examples of identical innovations. However, some discrepancies with the Trinity Pentateuchs and convergence with the original readings preserved in two other recensions show that the compiler of the Complete Palaea was dealing with an earlier common protographe. The Chronographic recension itself was divided into two groups (Trinity Pentateuchs and Iudejsky Chronograph ) approximately in the late 1100s or early 1200s and is now represented by only five manuscripts. Therefore, the evidence of the Complete Chronographic Palaea is important both for the textual analysis of the Old Slavonic biblical translations and for the history of the Old Russian chronographs as well. DOI: 10.31168/2305-6754.2020.9.2.5

查看原文本刊更多论文

《古埃及年表大全》中的《创世纪》和三位一体五经第1卷和第45卷

《古埃及年表大全》的某些部分包含了古斯拉夫语译本《圣经》的片段，这是为个人家庭或修道院阅读(古斯拉夫语中的chetij)而设计的。到目前为止，这一译本的来源还没有受到太多的学术关注。本文的主要目的是通过比较斯拉夫语《摩西五经》、《八经》和编年史的文本传统，来确定古埃及使用的《创世纪》的版本。完整Сhronographic Palaea是一个古老的俄罗斯编译包含旧约翻译和年代来源。它的圣经部分是建立在Palaea Interpretata的材料，以及斯拉夫语“chetij”圣经翻译的基础上的，而年表部分则是在所谓的Chronograph po velikomu izlozheniju版本之后，从翻译的拜占庭编年史中摘录了一些补充内容。总的来说，斯拉夫语八泰uch的手稿传统包括三个家族。虽然《古利亚全集》中《创世纪》的内插显示出与其中两个版本(即俄罗斯版本和南斯拉夫版本)几乎没有相似之处，但我们看到了许多与三位一体五经(Russian State Library, f.304)重叠的地方。1、No.1和No.45)。这组文本属于第三个，按时间顺序修订的“chetij”八经，具有特定的特征，涵盖了数十个相同创新的例子。然而，与三位一体五经的一些差异，以及与保存在另外两个修订本中的原始读数的趋同，表明《古拉亚全集》的编纂者处理的是一种更早的普通原稿。大约在11世纪末或12世纪初，编年史本身被分为两组(Trinity Pentateuchs和Iudejsky Chronograph)，现在只有五份手稿。因此，对于古斯拉夫语圣经翻译的文本分析和古俄语编年史的历史来说，完整的古埃及编年史的证据都是重要的。2305 - 6754.2020.9.2.5 DOI: 10.31168 /

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Slovene-International Journal of Slavic Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

50.00%

发文量

审稿时长

20 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal Slověne = Словѣне is a periodical focusing on the fields of the arts and humanities. In accordance with the standards of humanities periodicals aimed at the development of national philological traditions in a broad cultural and academic context, the Journal Slověne = Словѣне is multilingual but with a focus on papers in English. The Journal Slověne = Словѣне is intended for the exchange of information between Russian scholars and leading universities and research centers throughout the world and for their further professional integration into the international academic community through a shared focus on Slavic studies. The target audience of the journal is Slavic philologists and scholars in related disciplines (historians, cultural anthropologists, sociologists, specialists in comparative and religious studies, etc.) and related fields (Byzantinists, Germanists, Hebraists, Turkologists, Finno-Ugrists, etc.). The periodical has a pronounced interdisciplinary character and publishes papers from the widest linguistic, philological, and historico-cultural range: there are studies of linguistic typology, pragmalinguistics, computer and applied linguistics, etymology, onomastics, epigraphy, ethnolinguistics, dialectology, folkloristics, Biblical studies, history of science, palaeoslavistics, history of Slavic literatures, Slavs in the context of foreign languages, non-Slavic languages and dialects in the Slavic context, and historical linguistics.