Mixed methods single case study research (MMSCR): Challenges in WP evaluation

Roberts Zivtins, Timothy B. Jay, Robert J. Winston, A. Alexander
{"title":"Mixed methods single case study research (MMSCR): Challenges in WP evaluation","authors":"Roberts Zivtins, Timothy B. Jay, Robert J. Winston, A. Alexander","doi":"10.5456/wpll.22.2.225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evaluating widening participation (WP) interventions is complex. Early efforts at WP evaluation were criticised for lacking rigour. These criticisms were accompanied with suggested approaches to research, typically favouring randomised control trials. Yet these recommendations have,\n in turn, become the focus of much discussion and debate within the WP evaluation sector. This paper presents the use of a 'mixed methods single case study research' (MMSCR) study design to WP evaluation. It describes the work of a PhD researcher evaluating the school – university\n partnership science outreach programme between the Wohl Reach Out Lab at Imperial College London and a local secondary school. The article highlights potential challenges when using MMSCR, namely in ensuring internal validity and trustworthiness of the study. Solutions to these\n challenges are presented and the case is made for broadening what is seen as meaningful research in the sector.","PeriodicalId":90763,"journal":{"name":"Widening participation and lifelong learning : the journal of the Institute for Access Studies and the European Access Network","volume":"22 1","pages":"225-237"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Widening participation and lifelong learning : the journal of the Institute for Access Studies and the European Access Network","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5456/wpll.22.2.225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evaluating widening participation (WP) interventions is complex. Early efforts at WP evaluation were criticised for lacking rigour. These criticisms were accompanied with suggested approaches to research, typically favouring randomised control trials. Yet these recommendations have, in turn, become the focus of much discussion and debate within the WP evaluation sector. This paper presents the use of a 'mixed methods single case study research' (MMSCR) study design to WP evaluation. It describes the work of a PhD researcher evaluating the school – university partnership science outreach programme between the Wohl Reach Out Lab at Imperial College London and a local secondary school. The article highlights potential challenges when using MMSCR, namely in ensuring internal validity and trustworthiness of the study. Solutions to these challenges are presented and the case is made for broadening what is seen as meaningful research in the sector.
混合方法、单案例研究研究(MMSCR):工作效率评估中的挑战
评估扩大参与(WP)干预措施是复杂的。早期的评估工作被批评缺乏严谨性。这些批评伴随着建议的研究方法,通常倾向于随机对照试验。然而,这些建议反过来又成为工作方案评估部门内部大量讨论和辩论的焦点。本文介绍了使用“混合方法单一案例研究”(MMSCR)研究设计来评估工作效率。它描述了一位博士研究员评估伦敦帝国理工学院Wohl Reach Out实验室和当地一所中学之间的校际合作科学推广计划的工作。本文强调了使用MMSCR时的潜在挑战,即在确保研究的内部有效性和可信度方面。提出了这些挑战的解决方案,并提出了扩大该部门被视为有意义的研究的案例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信