Efficacy and safety of Guduchighana Vati in asymptomatic and mild-to-moderate cases of coronavirus disease-19: A randomized controlled pilot study

Ayu Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI:10.4103/ayu.ayu_11_21
A. Rai, U. Shukla, Nitin Ujjaliya, Pankaj Gupta, V. Khare, B. Yadav, Hetalben Amin, Rakesh Rana, Arunabh Tripathi, S. Khanduri, B. Sharma, B. Chandrasekhararao, Narayanam Srikanth, K. Dhiman
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of Guduchighana Vati in asymptomatic and mild-to-moderate cases of coronavirus disease-19: A randomized controlled pilot study","authors":"A. Rai, U. Shukla, Nitin Ujjaliya, Pankaj Gupta, V. Khare, B. Yadav, Hetalben Amin, Rakesh Rana, Arunabh Tripathi, S. Khanduri, B. Sharma, B. Chandrasekhararao, Narayanam Srikanth, K. Dhiman","doi":"10.4103/ayu.ayu_11_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Currently, there is no approved treatment for the management of coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Drug repurposing of existing medications could be a possible way to find out a novel therapeutic entity to combat the COVID-19. Aim: To determine the clinical efficacy and safety of an Ayurveda intervention (Guduchighana Vati) in asymptomatic and mild-to-moderate cases of COVID-19. Materials and methods: This was an open-label randomized controlled pilot study with a sample size of 30 participants (15 in each arm). The participants were asymptomatic or mild to moderate cases of COVID-19. Guduchighana Vati 500 mg twice daily for 10 days was administered in the study group and Hydroxychloroquine for 5 days in the control group. Paracetamol, Vitamin C, Multivitamin, and Zinc were also provided in the control group. The main outcome measures were to negative real-time reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay for COVID-19, proportion of participants with negative RT-PCR for COVID-19 at 5th and 10th day, proportion of participants with clinical recovery, improvement in laboratory parameters, and incidence of adverse drug reaction/adverse event (ADR/AE). The results of RT-PCR and clinical recovery were compared between groups using Chi-square test. The data related to laboratory parameters were compared within group using paired sample t-test/Wilcoxon signed-rank test and between groups using independent sample t-test/Mann–Whitney test. Results: The proportion of participants with negative RT-PCR for COVID-19 in the Guduchighana Vati group (93.3%) was better as compared to the control group (66.6%) till 10th day of the study period. Though, the results are statistically not significant (P = 0.068). All the symptomatic patients in the Guduchighana Vati group clinically recovered whereas one patient remained symptomatic in the control group on the 5th day. No symptoms of COVID-19 were observed at 10th day in both the groups. No ADR/serious adverse event were observed during the study period in either of the groups. Conclusion: In this study on asymptomatic and mild to moderate cases of COVID-19, Guduchighana Vati showed numerically better proportion of participants with negative RT-PCR assay for COVID-19 and reduced time to clinical improvement which requires confirmation through studies with larger sample size. Although, the study outcomes are statistically not significant which may be due to small sample size.","PeriodicalId":8720,"journal":{"name":"Ayu","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ayu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ayu.ayu_11_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Currently, there is no approved treatment for the management of coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Drug repurposing of existing medications could be a possible way to find out a novel therapeutic entity to combat the COVID-19. Aim: To determine the clinical efficacy and safety of an Ayurveda intervention (Guduchighana Vati) in asymptomatic and mild-to-moderate cases of COVID-19. Materials and methods: This was an open-label randomized controlled pilot study with a sample size of 30 participants (15 in each arm). The participants were asymptomatic or mild to moderate cases of COVID-19. Guduchighana Vati 500 mg twice daily for 10 days was administered in the study group and Hydroxychloroquine for 5 days in the control group. Paracetamol, Vitamin C, Multivitamin, and Zinc were also provided in the control group. The main outcome measures were to negative real-time reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay for COVID-19, proportion of participants with negative RT-PCR for COVID-19 at 5th and 10th day, proportion of participants with clinical recovery, improvement in laboratory parameters, and incidence of adverse drug reaction/adverse event (ADR/AE). The results of RT-PCR and clinical recovery were compared between groups using Chi-square test. The data related to laboratory parameters were compared within group using paired sample t-test/Wilcoxon signed-rank test and between groups using independent sample t-test/Mann–Whitney test. Results: The proportion of participants with negative RT-PCR for COVID-19 in the Guduchighana Vati group (93.3%) was better as compared to the control group (66.6%) till 10th day of the study period. Though, the results are statistically not significant (P = 0.068). All the symptomatic patients in the Guduchighana Vati group clinically recovered whereas one patient remained symptomatic in the control group on the 5th day. No symptoms of COVID-19 were observed at 10th day in both the groups. No ADR/serious adverse event were observed during the study period in either of the groups. Conclusion: In this study on asymptomatic and mild to moderate cases of COVID-19, Guduchighana Vati showed numerically better proportion of participants with negative RT-PCR assay for COVID-19 and reduced time to clinical improvement which requires confirmation through studies with larger sample size. Although, the study outcomes are statistically not significant which may be due to small sample size.
Guduchighana Vati治疗无症状和轻中度冠状病毒病的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试点研究
背景:目前,还没有批准的治疗冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的药物。对现有药物进行药物再利用,有可能开发出对抗新冠病毒的新型治疗药物。目的:探讨阿育吠陀治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)无症状和轻中度患者的临床疗效和安全性。材料和方法:这是一项开放标签随机对照先导研究,样本量为30名参与者(每组15名)。参与者为无症状或轻至中度COVID-19病例。研究组给予Guduchighana Vati 500 mg,每日2次,连用10天;对照组给予羟氯喹,连用5天。对照组同时给予扑热息痛、维生素C、多种维生素和锌。主要观察指标为实时逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测COVID-19阴性、第5天和第10天RT-PCR检测COVID-19阴性比例、临床恢复比例、实验室参数改善比例、药物不良反应/不良事件发生率(ADR/AE)。采用卡方检验比较两组患者的RT-PCR结果和临床恢复情况。与实验室参数相关的数据,组内比较采用配对样本t检验/Wilcoxon符号秩检验,组间比较采用独立样本t检验/ Mann-Whitney检验。结果:到研究期第10天,Guduchighana Vati组RT-PCR阴性的参与者比例(93.3%)优于对照组(66.6%)。然而,结果没有统计学意义(P = 0.068)。Guduchighana Vati组有症状患者均临床恢复,对照组1例患者在第5天仍有症状。第10天,两组均未观察到COVID-19症状。两组在研究期间均未观察到不良反应/严重不良事件。结论:在无症状和轻中度COVID-19病例的研究中,Guduchighana Vati的RT-PCR阴性比例更高,临床改善时间更短,这需要通过更大样本量的研究来证实。然而,由于样本量小,研究结果在统计学上并不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ayu
Ayu
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信