“Race”, Language and Xenophobia in Joseph Conrad’s “Amy Foster”

Pub Date : 2021-07-03 DOI:10.1080/02564718.2021.1959759
Harry Sewlall
{"title":"“Race”, Language and Xenophobia in Joseph Conrad’s “Amy Foster”","authors":"Harry Sewlall","doi":"10.1080/02564718.2021.1959759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Chinua Achebe’s animus against the creator of Heart of Darkness did not simply end with the charge of racism but extended to anti-Semitism and xenophobia as well. The term “xenophobia”, which is imbricated in the dialectics of race and language, features strongly in the current politics of diaspora and identity. Conventional scholarship on Conrad’s short fiction “Amy Foster” has followed two predominant strands, namely, the extreme loneliness of Yanko Goorall, the central protagonist of this seemingly mis-titled story, and his inability to communicate in a foreign land. This article, from the hermeneutic space afforded by postcoloniality, postulates the construct of “race”, as understood in the nineteenth century, as a major catalyst in the breakdown in the marriage of Yanko and Amy. It holds to the view that the tragedy of the former is not so much the outcome of a lack of communication between a castaway and his local English wife, but is predetermined in the face of an ethnocentric, if not rampantly “racist” insular, parochial community. The article concludes that the story is Conrad’s study of the racist recesses of the human psyche which manifest in discrimination against the other. Displaced geographically, culturally and linguistically, Yanko (like Conrad himself) is a metonymic inscription of alterity, whose attempts to reclaim his linguistic and cultural identity end in tragedy.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1092","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02564718.2021.1959759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary Chinua Achebe’s animus against the creator of Heart of Darkness did not simply end with the charge of racism but extended to anti-Semitism and xenophobia as well. The term “xenophobia”, which is imbricated in the dialectics of race and language, features strongly in the current politics of diaspora and identity. Conventional scholarship on Conrad’s short fiction “Amy Foster” has followed two predominant strands, namely, the extreme loneliness of Yanko Goorall, the central protagonist of this seemingly mis-titled story, and his inability to communicate in a foreign land. This article, from the hermeneutic space afforded by postcoloniality, postulates the construct of “race”, as understood in the nineteenth century, as a major catalyst in the breakdown in the marriage of Yanko and Amy. It holds to the view that the tragedy of the former is not so much the outcome of a lack of communication between a castaway and his local English wife, but is predetermined in the face of an ethnocentric, if not rampantly “racist” insular, parochial community. The article concludes that the story is Conrad’s study of the racist recesses of the human psyche which manifest in discrimination against the other. Displaced geographically, culturally and linguistically, Yanko (like Conrad himself) is a metonymic inscription of alterity, whose attempts to reclaim his linguistic and cultural identity end in tragedy.
分享
查看原文
约瑟夫·康拉德《艾米·福斯特》中的“种族”、语言与排外
Chinua Achebe对《黑暗之心》创造者的敌意不仅以种族主义的指控结束,还延伸到反犹太主义和仇外心理。“仇外心理”一词在种族和语言的辩证法中错综复杂,在当前的侨民和身份政治中具有强烈的特征。关于康拉德的短篇小说《艾米·福斯特》(Amy Foster),传统的学术研究主要围绕着两条线索展开,即这个看似标题有误的故事的主人公扬科·古尔(Yanko Goorall)极度孤独,以及他在异国他乡无法沟通。本文从后殖民主义提供的解释学空间出发,假设了“种族”的结构,正如19世纪所理解的那样,是扬科和艾米婚姻破裂的主要催化剂。它坚持认为,前者的悲剧与其说是一个漂流者和他当地的英国妻子之间缺乏沟通的结果,倒不如说是在面对一个种族中心主义(如果不是猖獗的“种族主义”)、孤立的、狭隘的社区时注定要发生的。文章的结论是,康拉德的故事是对人类心理种族主义的研究,表现在对他人的歧视。在地理、文化和语言上流离失所的扬科(就像康拉德自己一样)是另类的转喻,他试图重新获得自己的语言和文化身份,但最终以悲剧告终。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信