Breast MR Imaging Helps Differentiate Malignant and Benign Mammographic Microcalcifications: A Study Based on the 5th Edition of BI-RADS

L. R., W. L., W. D., Z. Y., Chen Y
{"title":"Breast MR Imaging Helps Differentiate Malignant and Benign Mammographic Microcalcifications: A Study Based on the 5th Edition of BI-RADS","authors":"L. R., W. L., W. D., Z. Y., Chen Y","doi":"10.47829/coo.2021.5301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To investigate whether breast MR imaging could help in differentiating malignant from benign mammographic microcalcifications. Methods: The study consecutively included 106 patients with 112 mammographic microcalcifications between January 2014 and April 2017 in our institute. Pre-operative mammograms and breast MR images were analyzed in a blind manner by two trained breast imaging subspecialists. Each lesion was described and categorized according to the 5th BI-RADS atlas. AUC, sensitivity, specificity, positive Likelihood Ratio (LR) were used to evaluate the value of MR imaging in differentiating malignancy from benignity. Results: Of the 112 lesions, pathologic results revealed 81 benign, 12 pre-cancerous and 19 malignant (10 invasive cancer and 9 ductal carcinoma in situ) findings. The number of lesions assigned to BIRADS 3, 4B, 4C, and 5 was 2, 92, 16, and 2, respectively, resulting in a PPV of 14.7% (17/108) for MG-BI-RADS 4 microcalcifications. The number of MRI classification 1 to 5 to the corresponding BI-RADS 4B microcalcifications were 37, 2, 33, 27, and 9 respectively. MR-BI-RADS criteria ruled out 72 benign MG-BI-RADS 4 lesions with none malignancy missed, while MRI enhancement criteria ruled out 46 benign lesions. MR-BI-RADS criteria were significantly better in AUC (0.896, P<0.0001), specificity (79.12%, P<0.0001), and positive LR (4.79) than mammography and MRI enhancement criteria. Conclusion: Breast MR imaging is useful in the evaluation of BI-RADS 4 mammographic microcalcifications by avoiding 79.12% unnecessary biopsies with none false-negative diagnosis.","PeriodicalId":92766,"journal":{"name":"Clinics of oncology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics of oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47829/coo.2021.5301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether breast MR imaging could help in differentiating malignant from benign mammographic microcalcifications. Methods: The study consecutively included 106 patients with 112 mammographic microcalcifications between January 2014 and April 2017 in our institute. Pre-operative mammograms and breast MR images were analyzed in a blind manner by two trained breast imaging subspecialists. Each lesion was described and categorized according to the 5th BI-RADS atlas. AUC, sensitivity, specificity, positive Likelihood Ratio (LR) were used to evaluate the value of MR imaging in differentiating malignancy from benignity. Results: Of the 112 lesions, pathologic results revealed 81 benign, 12 pre-cancerous and 19 malignant (10 invasive cancer and 9 ductal carcinoma in situ) findings. The number of lesions assigned to BIRADS 3, 4B, 4C, and 5 was 2, 92, 16, and 2, respectively, resulting in a PPV of 14.7% (17/108) for MG-BI-RADS 4 microcalcifications. The number of MRI classification 1 to 5 to the corresponding BI-RADS 4B microcalcifications were 37, 2, 33, 27, and 9 respectively. MR-BI-RADS criteria ruled out 72 benign MG-BI-RADS 4 lesions with none malignancy missed, while MRI enhancement criteria ruled out 46 benign lesions. MR-BI-RADS criteria were significantly better in AUC (0.896, P<0.0001), specificity (79.12%, P<0.0001), and positive LR (4.79) than mammography and MRI enhancement criteria. Conclusion: Breast MR imaging is useful in the evaluation of BI-RADS 4 mammographic microcalcifications by avoiding 79.12% unnecessary biopsies with none false-negative diagnosis.
乳腺MR成像有助于鉴别恶性和良性乳腺微钙化:基于第5版BI-RADS的研究
目的:探讨乳腺MR影像对乳腺微钙化的鉴别价值。方法:本研究连续纳入我院2014年1月至2017年4月106例乳房x线微钙化患者112例。术前乳房x光片和乳房MR图像由两名训练有素的乳腺成像专科医生进行盲法分析。根据第5次BI-RADS图谱对每个病变进行描述和分类。采用AUC、敏感性、特异性、阳性似然比(LR)评价MR影像对良恶性鉴别的价值。结果:112例病变中,良性81例,癌前病变12例,恶性19例(浸润性癌10例,导管原位癌9例)。划分为BIRADS 3、4B、4C和5的病变数量分别为2、92、16和2,导致MG-BI-RADS 4微钙化的PPV为14.7%(17/108)。对应BI-RADS 4B的MRI 1 ~ 5级微钙化分别为37个、2个、33个、27个、9个。MR-BI-RADS标准排除良性病变72个,无恶性遗漏,MRI增强标准排除良性病变46个。MR-BI-RADS标准在AUC (0.896, P<0.0001)、特异性(79.12%,P<0.0001)和LR阳性(4.79)方面明显优于乳腺x线摄影和MRI增强标准。结论:乳腺MR成像可避免79.12%的不必要活检,无假阴性诊断,有助于评估BI-RADS 4型乳腺微钙化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信