Hands-on Approaches to Biomechanics Education in a Technologically Connected Classroom

D. Vashishth, Winson T. George, Jennifer Smith, J. Brunski, L. Ostrander
{"title":"Hands-on Approaches to Biomechanics Education in a Technologically Connected Classroom","authors":"D. Vashishth, Winson T. George, Jennifer Smith, J. Brunski, L. Ostrander","doi":"10.1115/imece2001/bed-23022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In contrast to the traditional classroom environment that promotes passive learning, the multimedia-based studio approach is considered to be a more effective tool for delivering course content as it increases active in-class involvement, teamwork experience and cooperative learning (Wilson 1994). More significantly, the studio environment provides a plethora of opportunities to include case studies that promote hands-on experience and problem-solving, illustrate real-life problems and increase student interest in the course content (Starrett and Morcos 2001). In general, engineering courses benefit from the availability of simulation and analysis software in a multimedia studio environment. Biomedical engineering courses including biomechanics, however, are not always amenable to simulation and often require the setting of complicated and expensive tests involving human subjects and hazardous materials. Furthermore, unlike traditional medical courses, biomedical engineering departments do not have extensive teaching laboratories and students have little or no clinical exposure.","PeriodicalId":7238,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Bioengineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2001/bed-23022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In contrast to the traditional classroom environment that promotes passive learning, the multimedia-based studio approach is considered to be a more effective tool for delivering course content as it increases active in-class involvement, teamwork experience and cooperative learning (Wilson 1994). More significantly, the studio environment provides a plethora of opportunities to include case studies that promote hands-on experience and problem-solving, illustrate real-life problems and increase student interest in the course content (Starrett and Morcos 2001). In general, engineering courses benefit from the availability of simulation and analysis software in a multimedia studio environment. Biomedical engineering courses including biomechanics, however, are not always amenable to simulation and often require the setting of complicated and expensive tests involving human subjects and hazardous materials. Furthermore, unlike traditional medical courses, biomedical engineering departments do not have extensive teaching laboratories and students have little or no clinical exposure.
在技术连接的课堂上进行生物力学教育的实践方法
与促进被动学习的传统课堂环境相比,基于多媒体的工作室方法被认为是传递课程内容的更有效的工具,因为它增加了课堂上的主动参与,团队合作经验和合作学习(Wilson 1994)。更重要的是,工作室环境提供了大量的机会,包括案例研究,促进实践经验和解决问题,说明现实生活中的问题,提高学生对课程内容的兴趣(Starrett和Morcos 2001)。一般来说,工程课程受益于多媒体工作室环境中模拟和分析软件的可用性。然而,生物医学工程课程,包括生物力学,并不总是适用于模拟,往往需要设置复杂和昂贵的测试,涉及人体受试者和危险材料。此外,与传统医学课程不同,生物医学工程系没有广泛的教学实验室,学生很少或根本没有临床接触。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信