KAJIAN YURIDIS PENGESAMPINGAN PASAL 1266 DAN PASAL 1267 KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PERDATA SEBAGAI SYARAT BATAL DALAM PERJANJIAN KREDIT PERBANKAN

Rocky Marciano Ambar, B. Santoso, Hanif Nur Widhiyanti
{"title":"KAJIAN YURIDIS PENGESAMPINGAN PASAL 1266 DAN PASAL 1267 KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PERDATA SEBAGAI SYARAT BATAL DALAM PERJANJIAN KREDIT PERBANKAN","authors":"Rocky Marciano Ambar, B. Santoso, Hanif Nur Widhiyanti","doi":"10.30649/PHJ.V17I1.84","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Banks in credit agreements use more standard agreements, standard contracts in 2 (two) things, (1) There is an unbalanced position between banks and debtors, banks that have a more dominant position and debtors. (2) There is an understanding of the principle of freedom of contracting and without limits. The Bank has the freedom to seek the form and content of the agreement. Code of Ethics in agreement. The provisions of the Civil Code provide types of compensation for parties. Based on the background, then for problems the problem is written (1). Does the inclusion of Article 1266 and Article 1267 of the Civil Code on the banking system have collected the principles of balance and justice. (2) What are the legal implications of the exclusion clause. The research method is normative juridical research. The result of this research is the neglect of civil law and the principle of compensation is the principle of balance. The basic principle according to Rawls is that it is unfair or more people. in the sense of \"freedom of results\", in other words. is the nature of the debtor in a bank credit agreement. For the legal implications of the clause that excludes Article 1266 and Article 1267 of the Civil Code concerning the right of the debtor to the debtor. Legal efforts in finding and resolving problems that cannot be made by a decision due to the imbalance of the parties in the agreement. For people who make changes, no party will be harmed.","PeriodicalId":31466,"journal":{"name":"Perspektif Hukum Journal","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspektif Hukum Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30649/PHJ.V17I1.84","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Banks in credit agreements use more standard agreements, standard contracts in 2 (two) things, (1) There is an unbalanced position between banks and debtors, banks that have a more dominant position and debtors. (2) There is an understanding of the principle of freedom of contracting and without limits. The Bank has the freedom to seek the form and content of the agreement. Code of Ethics in agreement. The provisions of the Civil Code provide types of compensation for parties. Based on the background, then for problems the problem is written (1). Does the inclusion of Article 1266 and Article 1267 of the Civil Code on the banking system have collected the principles of balance and justice. (2) What are the legal implications of the exclusion clause. The research method is normative juridical research. The result of this research is the neglect of civil law and the principle of compensation is the principle of balance. The basic principle according to Rawls is that it is unfair or more people. in the sense of "freedom of results", in other words. is the nature of the debtor in a bank credit agreement. For the legal implications of the clause that excludes Article 1266 and Article 1267 of the Civil Code concerning the right of the debtor to the debtor. Legal efforts in finding and resolving problems that cannot be made by a decision due to the imbalance of the parties in the agreement. For people who make changes, no party will be harmed.
银行在信贷协议中使用更多的标准协议,标准合同在2(两)件事上,(1)银行和债务人之间的地位不平衡,银行有更大的优势地位和债务人。(2)对合同自由和不受限制的原则有一种理解。银行有权自行选择协议的形式和内容。同意职业道德准则。《民法典》的规定为当事人提供了各种赔偿。基于这一背景,然后针对问题写出问题(1)。《民法典》第1266条和第1267条关于银行制度的规定是否收集到了平衡与公正的原则?(2)免责条款的法律含义是什么?研究方法为规范法学研究。这种研究的结果是对民法的忽视,赔偿原则是平衡原则。根据罗尔斯的基本原则,它是不公平的或更多的人。换句话说,在“结果自由”的意义上。是银行信贷协议中债务人的性质。关于排除《民法典》第1266条和第1267条关于债务人对债务人的权利的条款的法律影响。为发现和解决由于协议各方的不平衡而无法通过决定解决的问题所做的法律努力。对于做出改变的人来说,没有一方会受到伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信