Bayesian Monitoring and Bootstrap Trial Simulation: A New Paradigm to Implement Adaptive Trial Design for Testing Antidepressant Drugs

E. Merlo-Pich, P. Bettica, R. Gomeni
{"title":"Bayesian Monitoring and Bootstrap Trial Simulation: A New Paradigm to Implement Adaptive Trial Design for Testing Antidepressant Drugs","authors":"E. Merlo-Pich, P. Bettica, R. Gomeni","doi":"10.2174/1874354400903000020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A novel methodology is proposed for continuous monitoring of efficacy data in ongoing antidepressant clinical trials and for decision making to support progression or discontinuation of the trial or one of the treatment arms. The Posterior Probability of Superiority (PPS) resulting from the application of Monte Carlo Markov Chain approach to a longitudinal model describing the time course of placebo and antidepressant drugs was used to estimate criteria to discontinue a treatment arm or the trial for futility, and to predict the treatment effect at study-end while the trial was still ongoing. The decision to stop the study was based on PPS, Predictive Power and on risk analysis based on a non-parametric bootstrap trial simulation. The performance of the Bayesian monitoring was evaluated by the retrospective analysis of 3 clinical trials. The Bootstrap-based methodology was compared to the Conditional Power and the Predictive Probability approaches. The application of the proposed methodology showed the possibility to stop a trial for futility when about 50% of total information was available and to detect signal of a treatment effect when limited information (<40%) was available. The comparisons with the Condition Power and the Predictive Probability approaches indicated that the Bayesian Bootstrap method, based on data-driven assumptions for priors, provided a better control for the risk of inappropriate decisions. The results suggest that the proposed methodology to monitor the accumulating information and to provide a scenario- based risk analysis could constitute a valuable approach to re-engineer the development process of novel drugs.","PeriodicalId":88755,"journal":{"name":"The open psychiatry journal","volume":"34 1","pages":"20-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open psychiatry journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874354400903000020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

A novel methodology is proposed for continuous monitoring of efficacy data in ongoing antidepressant clinical trials and for decision making to support progression or discontinuation of the trial or one of the treatment arms. The Posterior Probability of Superiority (PPS) resulting from the application of Monte Carlo Markov Chain approach to a longitudinal model describing the time course of placebo and antidepressant drugs was used to estimate criteria to discontinue a treatment arm or the trial for futility, and to predict the treatment effect at study-end while the trial was still ongoing. The decision to stop the study was based on PPS, Predictive Power and on risk analysis based on a non-parametric bootstrap trial simulation. The performance of the Bayesian monitoring was evaluated by the retrospective analysis of 3 clinical trials. The Bootstrap-based methodology was compared to the Conditional Power and the Predictive Probability approaches. The application of the proposed methodology showed the possibility to stop a trial for futility when about 50% of total information was available and to detect signal of a treatment effect when limited information (<40%) was available. The comparisons with the Condition Power and the Predictive Probability approaches indicated that the Bayesian Bootstrap method, based on data-driven assumptions for priors, provided a better control for the risk of inappropriate decisions. The results suggest that the proposed methodology to monitor the accumulating information and to provide a scenario- based risk analysis could constitute a valuable approach to re-engineer the development process of novel drugs.
贝叶斯监测和自举试验模拟:抗抑郁药物自适应试验设计的新范式
提出了一种新的方法,用于持续监测正在进行的抗抑郁药物临床试验的疗效数据,并用于支持试验进展或停止试验或其中一个治疗组的决策。通过蒙特卡洛马尔可夫链方法对描述安慰剂和抗抑郁药物时间过程的纵向模型的应用产生的后验优势概率(PPS)用于估计因无效而停止治疗组或试验的标准,并在试验仍在进行时预测研究结束时的治疗效果。停止研究的决定是基于PPS、Predictive Power和基于非参数自举试验模拟的风险分析。通过3项临床试验的回顾性分析,评价贝叶斯监测的效果。将基于bootstrap的方法与条件功率法和预测概率法进行了比较。所提出方法的应用表明,当总信息的50%可用时,有可能因无效而停止试验,当有限信息(<40%)可用时,有可能检测到治疗效果的信号。与条件功率和预测概率方法的比较表明,基于数据驱动的先验假设的贝叶斯Bootstrap方法可以更好地控制不适当决策的风险。结果表明,所提出的监测累积信息和提供基于情景的风险分析的方法可能构成一种有价值的方法来重新设计新药的开发过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信