Political Labels and Post-Politics

IF 0.8 Q2 AREA STUDIES

Israel Studies Review Pub Date : 2021-03-01 DOI:10.3167/ISR.2021.360104

Artur Skorek

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Debate over the present-day meaning of the traditional political terms ‘left’ and ‘right’ has been ongoing for at least three decades. Many claim that these labels have lost their former relevance. This article offers a comparative analysis of the Israeli, Polish, and Hungarian party systems. Using qualitative content analysis, it examines party platforms and politicians’ speeches in order to assess the significance of political labels both in political narratives and academic debate. Two main research topics concerning political systems of the three countries are explored in the article: the blurring of the traditional left-right divisions and the partial adoption of an anti-establishment agenda by mainstream parties.

查看原文本刊更多论文

政治标签和后政治

关于传统政治术语“左”和“右”的现代含义的争论已经持续了至少三十年。许多人声称这些标签已经失去了它们以前的意义。本文对以色列、波兰和匈牙利的政党制度进行了比较分析。使用定性内容分析，它考察了政党纲领和政治家的演讲，以评估政治标签在政治叙事和学术辩论中的重要性。本文探讨了三个国家政治制度的两个主要研究课题:传统左右分裂的模糊化和主流政党部分采用反建制议程。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Israel Studies Review AREA STUDIES-

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Israel Studies Review (ISR) is the journal of the Association for Israel Studies, an international and interdisciplinary scholarly organization dedicated to the study of all aspects of Israeli society, history, politics, and culture. ISR explores modern and contemporary Israel from the perspective of the social sciences, history, the humanities, and cultural studies and welcomes submissions on these subjects. The journal also pays close attention to the relationships of Israel to the Middle East and to the wider world, and encourages scholarly articles with this broader theoretical or comparative approach provided the focus remains on modern Israel.