Pharmacist Interventions Regarding the Appropriateness of Apixaban, Rivaroxaban, Dabigatran, and Warfarin in a University-Affiliated Outpatient Clinic

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Haley M. Phillippe, B. Wright, Kathryn E. Bowerman, Miranda Andrus
{"title":"Pharmacist Interventions Regarding the Appropriateness of Apixaban, Rivaroxaban, Dabigatran, and Warfarin in a University-Affiliated Outpatient Clinic","authors":"Haley M. Phillippe, B. Wright, Kathryn E. Bowerman, Miranda Andrus","doi":"10.1177/8755122516672693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become available recently as an alternative to warfarin in appropriate patients. Few studies have been conducted that evaluate pharmacist-managed services for the management of the DOACs. Objective: To review the appropriateness of DOAC therapy and warfarin therapy in adult patients in a university-affiliated outpatient clinic and the need for further monitoring of these agents. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients receiving a DOAC or warfarin therapy. Indication, dose, duration, age, weight, adherence, drug interactions, bleeding risk/history, renal function, and hepatic function were evaluated for DOACs and warfarin. If prescribed warfarin, international normalized ratio readings were also obtained. The pharmacists made verbal recommendations to primary care prescribers regarding findings, and changes to therapy were reviewed and documented. Results: A total of 175 patient charts were reviewed (49% DOACs, 51% warfarin). Twenty-five percent of prescribed DOACs should have been avoided due to inappropriate indication or renal function. The majority of these were switched to warfarin after discussion with the primary care provider. Of patients prescribed DOACs, 22% had a history of poor adherence to therapy and half of these were switched to warfarin. An additional 24% of prescribed DOACs were inappropriate due to incorrect dosing, major drug interactions, and/or renal dosing; however, these medications could be appropriate if adjustments are made. Nineteen percent of patients on warfarin therapy would be a candidate for DOAC therapy. Conclusion: Although there were limitations to this analysis, the results demonstrate that additional intervention is needed to improve appropriate prescribing and monitoring of the DOACs. Pharmacists can meet this need by providing medication reviews of novel anticoagulants and educating physicians.","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":"40 1","pages":"245 - 252"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/8755122516672693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become available recently as an alternative to warfarin in appropriate patients. Few studies have been conducted that evaluate pharmacist-managed services for the management of the DOACs. Objective: To review the appropriateness of DOAC therapy and warfarin therapy in adult patients in a university-affiliated outpatient clinic and the need for further monitoring of these agents. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients receiving a DOAC or warfarin therapy. Indication, dose, duration, age, weight, adherence, drug interactions, bleeding risk/history, renal function, and hepatic function were evaluated for DOACs and warfarin. If prescribed warfarin, international normalized ratio readings were also obtained. The pharmacists made verbal recommendations to primary care prescribers regarding findings, and changes to therapy were reviewed and documented. Results: A total of 175 patient charts were reviewed (49% DOACs, 51% warfarin). Twenty-five percent of prescribed DOACs should have been avoided due to inappropriate indication or renal function. The majority of these were switched to warfarin after discussion with the primary care provider. Of patients prescribed DOACs, 22% had a history of poor adherence to therapy and half of these were switched to warfarin. An additional 24% of prescribed DOACs were inappropriate due to incorrect dosing, major drug interactions, and/or renal dosing; however, these medications could be appropriate if adjustments are made. Nineteen percent of patients on warfarin therapy would be a candidate for DOAC therapy. Conclusion: Although there were limitations to this analysis, the results demonstrate that additional intervention is needed to improve appropriate prescribing and monitoring of the DOACs. Pharmacists can meet this need by providing medication reviews of novel anticoagulants and educating physicians.
一所大学附属门诊对阿哌沙班、利伐沙班、达比加群和华法林适宜性的药师干预
背景:直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)最近已成为合适患者华法林的替代选择。很少有研究对药剂师管理的doac管理服务进行评价。目的:评价某大学附属门诊成人患者DOAC治疗和华法林治疗的适宜性以及进一步监测这些药物的必要性。方法:对接受DOAC或华法林治疗的患者进行回顾性分析。评估DOACs和华法林的适应症、剂量、持续时间、年龄、体重、依从性、药物相互作用、出血风险/病史、肾功能和肝功能。如果处方华法林,也获得国际标准化比率读数。药剂师就结果向初级保健处方医生提出口头建议,并审查和记录治疗的变化。结果:共审查了175例患者的病历(49% DOACs, 51%华法林)。由于适应症或肾功能不合适,25%的处方doac本应避免。其中大多数在与初级保健提供者讨论后改用华法林。在处方doac的患者中,22%有治疗依从性差的病史,其中一半改用华法林。另外24%的处方doac由于不正确的剂量、主要的药物相互作用和/或肾脏剂量而不适当;然而,如果进行调整,这些药物可能是合适的。19%接受华法林治疗的患者将成为DOAC治疗的候选人。结论:虽然该分析存在局限性,但结果表明,需要额外的干预措施来改善doac的适当处方和监测。药剂师可以通过提供新型抗凝血剂的药物评论和教育医生来满足这一需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Technology
Journal of Pharmacy Technology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: For both pharmacists and technicians, jPT provides valuable information for those interested in the entire body of pharmacy practice. jPT covers new drugs, products, and equipment; therapeutic trends; organizational, legal, and educational activities; drug distribution and administration; and includes continuing education articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信