Toward Analog Geographies: Moving with and beyond Enclosure

IF 1 Q3 GEOGRAPHY
R. Squire, P. Adey, R. Jensen
{"title":"Toward Analog Geographies: Moving with and beyond Enclosure","authors":"R. Squire, P. Adey, R. Jensen","doi":"10.1080/2373566X.2022.2108718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article calls for closer attention to be paid to particular kinds of spaces, practices, and sensibilities that might best be explored through the prism of the analog. We argue that this is important, not only in accounting for wide-ranging analogic histories but also to capture how the allure of the analog and analogic practices have taken hold in present times amidst a climate emergency and ambitions for extra-planetary futures. We use “analog” broadly as a noun to refer to a space, practice, logic or sensibility that is comparable to, or seeking to reproduce another. An analog is, in other words, some kind of best approximation of something else, of other world(s) or conditions that enable different kinds of living where otherwise they may be impossible. Within this framework, the article traces analog geographies through time and space and makes three key interventions in the process. The first is to bring a range of literature within geography and the humanities into conversation to position analog geographies and provide a lens through which to think critically about humanity’s relationship with the planet and about ideas of shelter in an ever more challenging climate. The second intervention is to challenge the assumption that analogs solely serve the technological fantasies of elite actors. While analogs can (and often do) do this, we argue that they can also embody more hopeful and equitable engagements with the future. Finally, we call for further research into analog geographies and outline potential future directions that this might take.","PeriodicalId":53217,"journal":{"name":"Geohumanities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geohumanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2373566X.2022.2108718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article calls for closer attention to be paid to particular kinds of spaces, practices, and sensibilities that might best be explored through the prism of the analog. We argue that this is important, not only in accounting for wide-ranging analogic histories but also to capture how the allure of the analog and analogic practices have taken hold in present times amidst a climate emergency and ambitions for extra-planetary futures. We use “analog” broadly as a noun to refer to a space, practice, logic or sensibility that is comparable to, or seeking to reproduce another. An analog is, in other words, some kind of best approximation of something else, of other world(s) or conditions that enable different kinds of living where otherwise they may be impossible. Within this framework, the article traces analog geographies through time and space and makes three key interventions in the process. The first is to bring a range of literature within geography and the humanities into conversation to position analog geographies and provide a lens through which to think critically about humanity’s relationship with the planet and about ideas of shelter in an ever more challenging climate. The second intervention is to challenge the assumption that analogs solely serve the technological fantasies of elite actors. While analogs can (and often do) do this, we argue that they can also embody more hopeful and equitable engagements with the future. Finally, we call for further research into analog geographies and outline potential future directions that this might take.
走向模拟地理:与围墙一起移动并超越围墙
本文呼吁更密切地关注特定类型的空间、实践和情感,这些空间、实践和情感可能最好地通过模拟的棱镜来探索。我们认为,这一点很重要,不仅可以解释广泛的类比历史,还可以捕捉到在当前气候紧急情况和对外行星未来的雄心壮志中,类比和类比实践的吸引力是如何占据主导地位的。我们将“模拟”广义地用作名词,指的是与另一个空间、实践、逻辑或感性相媲美或试图复制另一个空间、实践、逻辑或感性。换句话说,模拟物是对其他事物、其他世界或其他条件的某种最佳逼近,这些世界或条件使不同种类的生命得以生存,否则它们可能无法生存。在此框架下,本文通过时间和空间追踪模拟地理,并在此过程中进行了三个关键干预。首先是将一系列地理学和人文学科的文献引入到对话中,以定位模拟地理学,并提供一个视角,通过这个视角,人们可以批判性地思考人类与地球的关系,以及在更具挑战性的气候中寻找庇护所的想法。第二个干预措施是挑战一种假设,即类似物只服务于精英演员的技术幻想。虽然类似物可以(而且经常)做到这一点,但我们认为,它们也可以体现出对未来更有希望和更公平的参与。最后,我们呼吁进一步研究模拟地理,并概述未来可能采取的潜在方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geohumanities
Geohumanities GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信