G. Vuuren, James Macdonald
{"title":"A Comparison of Emerging and Developed Economy Portfolio Performance Under COVID-19","authors":"G. Vuuren, James Macdonald","doi":"10.55365/1923.x2022.20.83","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Orientation: The performance of three different portfolio allocation strategies is assessed in a developed and a developing economy during different economic conditions over a period of seven years. Research purpose: Evaluate the performance of the portfolios – namely, the tangent, minimum-variance, and maximally diversified portfolio – across a developed and a developing economy and investigate the advantages and disadvantages that each portfolio poses in differing economic conditions. Motivation for the study: Understanding the benefits and drawbacks of each of these portfolios in times of crisis and in times of economic expansion could assist asset managers in making effectiveallocation decisions for their portfolios in different economic conditions. Research approach/design and method: Portfolio optimisation under various constraints. Main findings: Tangent portfolios produced superior returns to the other portfolios and the US portfolios consistently outperformed the South African ones. The minimum variance portfolio provided greater returns and downside protection than the maximally diversified portfolio during the COVID-19 market crash for the developed economy, while the opposite was observed for the developing economy. Practical/managerial implications: Practical knowledge of how each of the portfolios perform within different economic climates can assist asset managers to produce positive performance in times of recession and expansion. Contribution/value-add: Information and analysis on each of these portfolio asset allocation strategies during various economic conditions assists asset managers in finding the most effective way to structure their portfolios. Copyright © 2022– All Rights Reserved.","PeriodicalId":52251,"journal":{"name":"Review of Economics and Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55365/1923.x2022.20.83","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
新冠肺炎疫情下新兴经济体与发达经济体投资组合绩效比较
取向:评估了发达经济体和发展中经济体在七年期间不同经济条件下的三种不同投资组合配置策略的表现。研究目的:评估一个发达经济体和一个发展中经济体的投资组合的表现,即切线、最小方差和最大多样化的投资组合,并调查每个投资组合在不同经济条件下的优势和劣势。研究动机:了解这些投资组合在危机时期和经济扩张时期的利弊,可以帮助资产管理者在不同的经济条件下为他们的投资组合做出有效的配置决策。研究方法/设计和方法:各种约束下的投资组合优化。主要发现:相切投资组合产生了优于其他投资组合的回报,美国投资组合的表现始终优于南非投资组合。在2019冠状病毒病市场崩盘期间,最小方差投资组合比最大多元化投资组合提供了更大的回报和下行保护,而发展中经济体则相反。实际/管理意义:对每个投资组合在不同经济环境下如何表现的实用知识,可以帮助资产经理在经济衰退和扩张时期取得积极的业绩。贡献/增值:在不同的经济条件下,对这些投资组合资产配置策略的信息和分析有助于资产管理者找到最有效的方式来构建他们的投资组合。版权所有©2022 -北京icp备130130130@163.com
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。