Tailored Workflow for Optimizing the Hydraulic Fracturing in Tight Reservoir Development: A Case Study from Cambay Basin

V. Pandey, Sunil Kumar Dimri, D. Mathur, Raman R. K. Singh, A. Dutt, S. Khataniar, Ankit Agarwal, A. Herrera, K. Fischer, C. Darous, Vinil Mukku, R. Talreja, D. Gunasekaran, S. Aderemi, Somesh Bahuguna
{"title":"Tailored Workflow for Optimizing the Hydraulic Fracturing in Tight Reservoir Development: A Case Study from Cambay Basin","authors":"V. Pandey, Sunil Kumar Dimri, D. Mathur, Raman R. K. Singh, A. Dutt, S. Khataniar, Ankit Agarwal, A. Herrera, K. Fischer, C. Darous, Vinil Mukku, R. Talreja, D. Gunasekaran, S. Aderemi, Somesh Bahuguna","doi":"10.2118/197642-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Rock fabric characteristics of Gamij Field lies in the purview of conventional reservoirs but are as complex and uncertain as unconventional. It is a multi-layered, heterogeneous reservoir on depletion drive with very low permeability. Even after hydraulic fracturing and artificial lift, the production rate lies in the range of 3-4 m3/d. This paper evaluates the impact of past hydraulic fracture operations and uses this understanding to optimize the stimulation strategy for future wells.\n \n \n \n A customized multidisciplinary modeling and flow simulation workflow; integrating petrophysical, geomechanical, stimulation and production data was adopted and applied to sectors of the field. Two techniques were combined 1. Unconventional (Fast Loop) 2. Conventional (Slow Loop) in an intriguing and iterative manner. Hydraulic Fractures were designed, optimized and calibrated using a rigorous workflow of unstructured grid and unconventional fracture modelling/3D planar fractures in the sector models. Sector model is considered the most effective approach to characterize completion quality in Gamij Field due to the limitation of current modelling technologies to design and simulate hydraulic fractures in full-field model.\n \n \n \n The results of sector model is validated with full field model and a number of iterations were performed to match pressure from the result to the initially assumed in creation of 3D MEM (Mechanical Earth Model). Reservoir quality (RQ) estimation is affected by complex mineralogy including abundance of iron and titanium rich sediments. Stress regime shows vertical transverse isotropy nature of shales and suggest re-orientations near to fault zones. There are several areas, especially in the eastern part, where the tectonic regime changes from normal to strike-slip faulting. HF modelling not only explains the contrasting behavior of existing wells, but also discusses alternatives that could help to unlock the true potential of the pay zones. This paper elucidates techniques to maximize reservoir understanding and allow optimization of hydraulic fracture design in terms of casing diameter, job size, and design. Simulations shows multiple fractures were created from different preformation cluster in a single stage treatment. Overall, the case study showcases different factors that govern the development of a tight oil reservoir and the ways to characterize and quantify these uncertainties.\n \n \n \n This work is the first step to quantify the complex reservoir mineralogy, impact of laminations, depletion, stress variation on the efficiency of HF jobs. Identification of potential sweet spots based on reservoir quality and completion quality indexes, establishing well productivity. The uncertainty cannot be eliminated but it ought to be reduced and risk analyzed before the actual execution.\n","PeriodicalId":11328,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, November 14, 2019","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, November 14, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/197642-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rock fabric characteristics of Gamij Field lies in the purview of conventional reservoirs but are as complex and uncertain as unconventional. It is a multi-layered, heterogeneous reservoir on depletion drive with very low permeability. Even after hydraulic fracturing and artificial lift, the production rate lies in the range of 3-4 m3/d. This paper evaluates the impact of past hydraulic fracture operations and uses this understanding to optimize the stimulation strategy for future wells. A customized multidisciplinary modeling and flow simulation workflow; integrating petrophysical, geomechanical, stimulation and production data was adopted and applied to sectors of the field. Two techniques were combined 1. Unconventional (Fast Loop) 2. Conventional (Slow Loop) in an intriguing and iterative manner. Hydraulic Fractures were designed, optimized and calibrated using a rigorous workflow of unstructured grid and unconventional fracture modelling/3D planar fractures in the sector models. Sector model is considered the most effective approach to characterize completion quality in Gamij Field due to the limitation of current modelling technologies to design and simulate hydraulic fractures in full-field model. The results of sector model is validated with full field model and a number of iterations were performed to match pressure from the result to the initially assumed in creation of 3D MEM (Mechanical Earth Model). Reservoir quality (RQ) estimation is affected by complex mineralogy including abundance of iron and titanium rich sediments. Stress regime shows vertical transverse isotropy nature of shales and suggest re-orientations near to fault zones. There are several areas, especially in the eastern part, where the tectonic regime changes from normal to strike-slip faulting. HF modelling not only explains the contrasting behavior of existing wells, but also discusses alternatives that could help to unlock the true potential of the pay zones. This paper elucidates techniques to maximize reservoir understanding and allow optimization of hydraulic fracture design in terms of casing diameter, job size, and design. Simulations shows multiple fractures were created from different preformation cluster in a single stage treatment. Overall, the case study showcases different factors that govern the development of a tight oil reservoir and the ways to characterize and quantify these uncertainties. This work is the first step to quantify the complex reservoir mineralogy, impact of laminations, depletion, stress variation on the efficiency of HF jobs. Identification of potential sweet spots based on reservoir quality and completion quality indexes, establishing well productivity. The uncertainty cannot be eliminated but it ought to be reduced and risk analyzed before the actual execution.
致密储层水力压裂优化工作流程:以Cambay盆地为例
Gamij油田的岩石组构特征属于常规储层,但与非常规储层一样复杂且不确定。该油藏为多层非均质衰竭驱动油藏,渗透率极低。即使经过水力压裂和人工举升,产量仍在3-4 m3/d。本文评估了过去水力压裂作业的影响,并利用这一认识来优化未来油井的增产策略。定制多学科建模和流程仿真工作流;整合了岩石物理、地质力学、增产和生产数据,并将其应用于油田的各个部门。两种技术结合在一起。非常规(快速循环)传统(慢循环)在一个有趣的和迭代的方式。水力裂缝的设计、优化和校准采用了严格的非结构化网格和非常规裂缝建模/3D平面裂缝的工作流程。由于现有建模技术在设计和模拟全油田水力裂缝方面的局限性,扇区模型被认为是表征Gamij油田完井质量的最有效方法。扇区模型的结果与全场模型进行了验证,并进行了多次迭代,以将结果与创建3D MEM(机械地球模型)时的初始假设压力进行匹配。储层质量(RQ)评价受含铁和富钛沉积物丰度等复杂矿物学因素的影响。应力状态显示页岩纵向横向各向同性,表明在断裂带附近重新定向。有几个地区,特别是东部地区,构造体制由正断层向走滑断层转变。高频建模不仅解释了现有井的对比行为,而且还讨论了有助于释放产层真正潜力的替代方案。本文阐述了最大限度地了解储层并在套管直径、作业尺寸和设计方面优化水力压裂设计的技术。模拟表明,在一次压裂中,不同的预储层簇形成了多条裂缝。总的来说,该案例研究展示了影响致密油油藏开发的不同因素,以及描述和量化这些不确定性的方法。这项工作是量化复杂储层矿物学、层压、枯竭、应力变化对高频作业效率的影响的第一步。根据储层质量和完井质量指标识别潜在甜点,确定油井产能。不确定性无法消除,但应该在实际执行之前减少和分析风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信