{"title":"The ever-widening contexts of Konstantin Stanislavsky","authors":"L. Senelick","doi":"10.1080/20567790.2019.1700734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Adopting and adapting Giorgio Strehler’s notion of treating a great play as a series of nesting boxes, I intend to examine the contexts of Stanislavsky’s life and work as Matryoshka dolls, ever widening in significance. The first, most compact box is the biographical: the influence of family, education, theatrical experience, and cultural background on his artistic programme. It is set within the second: the historical, tracking his responses to the broader political and socio-economic events that bore in upon him. The third is the ideological: siting his ideas within the intellectual and aesthetic trends of his time. Finally, I hope to demonstrate how, become an institution in modern theatrical thought and practice, he has generated an all-encompassing context of his own.","PeriodicalId":40821,"journal":{"name":"Stanislavski Studies","volume":"107 1","pages":"7 - 21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stanislavski Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20567790.2019.1700734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
ABSTRACT Adopting and adapting Giorgio Strehler’s notion of treating a great play as a series of nesting boxes, I intend to examine the contexts of Stanislavsky’s life and work as Matryoshka dolls, ever widening in significance. The first, most compact box is the biographical: the influence of family, education, theatrical experience, and cultural background on his artistic programme. It is set within the second: the historical, tracking his responses to the broader political and socio-economic events that bore in upon him. The third is the ideological: siting his ideas within the intellectual and aesthetic trends of his time. Finally, I hope to demonstrate how, become an institution in modern theatrical thought and practice, he has generated an all-encompassing context of his own.