The Measurement of Socially Responsible Leadership: Considerations in Establishing Psychometric Rigor

IF 0.3 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
John P. Dugan
{"title":"The Measurement of Socially Responsible Leadership: Considerations in Establishing Psychometric Rigor","authors":"John P. Dugan","doi":"10.7358/ECPS-2015-012-DUGA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As educational institutions increase attention toward the preparation of future citizen leaders, the assessment of the efficacy of these interventions must increase in sophistication as well. Socially responsible leadership, and the social change model of leadership development from which it is derived, are among the most applied conceptual frameworks informing leadership education. Educational gains associated with this approach are typically assessed using the «Socially Responsible Leadership Scale» (SRLS), an instrument that has been used widely in educational research in the United States. This paper extends the psychometric understanding of the SRLS using findings from the Multi-Institutional Study of Leadership (MSL), an international research program examining developmental and educational influences on socially responsible leadership. To date, MSL has collected data in five countries at over 300 institutions of higher education with over 300,000 participants. Implications from this paper explore how the psychometric rigor of the SRLS can continue to evolve as well as considerations for the theoretical evolution of the social change model and socially responsible leadership.","PeriodicalId":41872,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Cultural and Psychological Studies","volume":"28 1","pages":"23-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Cultural and Psychological Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7358/ECPS-2015-012-DUGA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

As educational institutions increase attention toward the preparation of future citizen leaders, the assessment of the efficacy of these interventions must increase in sophistication as well. Socially responsible leadership, and the social change model of leadership development from which it is derived, are among the most applied conceptual frameworks informing leadership education. Educational gains associated with this approach are typically assessed using the «Socially Responsible Leadership Scale» (SRLS), an instrument that has been used widely in educational research in the United States. This paper extends the psychometric understanding of the SRLS using findings from the Multi-Institutional Study of Leadership (MSL), an international research program examining developmental and educational influences on socially responsible leadership. To date, MSL has collected data in five countries at over 300 institutions of higher education with over 300,000 participants. Implications from this paper explore how the psychometric rigor of the SRLS can continue to evolve as well as considerations for the theoretical evolution of the social change model and socially responsible leadership.
社会责任领导的测量:建立心理测量严谨性的考虑
随着教育机构越来越重视培养未来的公民领袖,对这些干预措施有效性的评估也必须变得更加复杂。对社会负责的领导力,以及由此衍生的领导力发展的社会变革模型,是最适用的概念框架之一,为领导力教育提供信息。与这种方法相关的教育收益通常使用“社会责任领导量表”(SRLS)进行评估,这是一种在美国教育研究中广泛使用的工具。本文利用多机构领导力研究(MSL)的研究结果,扩展了对社会责任领导力的心理测量学理解。MSL是一个国际研究项目,旨在研究发展和教育对社会责任领导力的影响。迄今为止,MSL已经收集了5个国家300多所高等教育机构的数据,参与者超过30万人。本文探讨了SRLS的心理测量严谨性如何继续演变,以及对社会变革模型和社会责任领导理论演变的考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信