A Capacity Planning Model for Microgrids in Rural India

Arkasama Bandyopadhyay, Katrina Ramirez-Meyers, E. Wikramanayake, B. Leibowicz, M. Webber, V. Bahadur
{"title":"A Capacity Planning Model for Microgrids in Rural India","authors":"Arkasama Bandyopadhyay, Katrina Ramirez-Meyers, E. Wikramanayake, B. Leibowicz, M. Webber, V. Bahadur","doi":"10.1115/imece2019-11707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this study, we develop a load estimation method and an optimization tool for community-driven planning of rural electricity systems which aims to encourage stakeholder involvement in planning processes and reinforce the sustainability of small-scale electrification projects. Electricity demand is estimated through the bottom-up construction of load profiles based on devices used in three common rural end-use sectors. A cost minimization model is then implemented to determine the least-cost capacity composition that can be installed based on the load profile and energy availability. The energy sources modeled are small-scale wind, hydro, solar (photovoltaic), diesel, and battery. In the base case, which includes the three sectors equally, most of the optimal capacity (77%) is provided by renewable energy at an average levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) of $0.05/kWh for a notional village with 500 houses. The base case results are compared to the results when each sector is respectively favored. The results show that backup dispatchable generation and batteries can both be solutions to intermittent renewables, and the choice between the two appears to depend on the load shape. We also find that the base case results are not very sensitive to the CO2 tax, suggesting that not only are renewables cost-competitive with or without the tax, but they also benefit economically from coupling with cheap fossil fuel generators.","PeriodicalId":23629,"journal":{"name":"Volume 6: Energy","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 6: Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2019-11707","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we develop a load estimation method and an optimization tool for community-driven planning of rural electricity systems which aims to encourage stakeholder involvement in planning processes and reinforce the sustainability of small-scale electrification projects. Electricity demand is estimated through the bottom-up construction of load profiles based on devices used in three common rural end-use sectors. A cost minimization model is then implemented to determine the least-cost capacity composition that can be installed based on the load profile and energy availability. The energy sources modeled are small-scale wind, hydro, solar (photovoltaic), diesel, and battery. In the base case, which includes the three sectors equally, most of the optimal capacity (77%) is provided by renewable energy at an average levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) of $0.05/kWh for a notional village with 500 houses. The base case results are compared to the results when each sector is respectively favored. The results show that backup dispatchable generation and batteries can both be solutions to intermittent renewables, and the choice between the two appears to depend on the load shape. We also find that the base case results are not very sensitive to the CO2 tax, suggesting that not only are renewables cost-competitive with or without the tax, but they also benefit economically from coupling with cheap fossil fuel generators.
印度农村微电网容量规划模型
在本研究中,我们为社区驱动的农村电力系统规划开发了一种负荷估计方法和优化工具,旨在鼓励利益相关者参与规划过程,并加强小规模电气化项目的可持续性。电力需求是通过基于三个常见的农村最终用途部门使用的设备自下而上地构建负荷概况来估计的。然后实现成本最小化模型,以确定可根据负载概况和能源可用性安装的成本最低的容量组合。模型中的能源包括小规模的风能、水力、太阳能(光伏)、柴油和电池。在基本情况下,这三个部门都是平等的,对于一个有500户房屋的村庄,大部分的最佳容量(77%)是由可再生能源提供的,平均电力成本(LCOE)为0.05美元/千瓦时。将基本情况的结果与每个部门分别受到青睐的结果进行比较。结果表明,备用可调度发电和备用电池都可以作为间歇性可再生能源的解决方案,两者之间的选择似乎取决于负载的形状。我们还发现,基本情况的结果对二氧化碳税不是很敏感,这表明,无论是否征收二氧化碳税,可再生能源不仅在成本上具有竞争力,而且与廉价的化石燃料发电机结合在一起,它们在经济上也会受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信