Moringa oleifera: A Bibliometric Analysis of International Publications during 1935-2019

Pharmacognosy reviews Pub Date : 2020-12-15 DOI:10.5530/PHREV.2020.14.12

B. Gupta, K. Ahmed

{"title":"Moringa oleifera: A Bibliometric Analysis of International Publications during 1935-2019","authors":"B. Gupta, K. Ahmed","doi":"10.5530/PHREV.2020.14.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cite this article: Gupta BM, Ahmed KK. Moringa oleifera: A Bibliometric Analysis of International Publications during 1935-2019. Pharmacog Rev. 2020;14(28):82-90. ABSTRACT The paper examines quantitative and qualitative aspects of research on Moringa oleifera, based on global publications output (3187 publications), as covered in Scopus database during 1935-2019. The publications on Moringa oleifera registered annual average growth of 16.18% and cumulative growth of 3594.0% and averaged to 17.69 citations per paper. Bulk of global publications output (76.72%) and the global citations (68.06%) in the field emanates from top 10 countries. The paper further provides an insight into qualitative performance of research on Moringa oleifera in terms of relative citation index, citations per paper, highly cited papers, besides analyzing the top 25 global organizations and authors in the field, the distribution of publications by broad subjects, the identification of the most significance keywords, the most productive journals and the analysis of higher-cited papers in the field. The study found that Universidade Estadual de Maringa, Brazil (72 papers), National Research Centre, Giza, Egypt (66 papers) and University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan (65 papers) were the most productive organizations and University of Agriculture, Faisalaba, Pakistan (38.35 and 2.17), University of Karachi, Pakistan (35.23 and 1.99) and Mahidol University, Thailand (27.35 and 1.55) were the most significant organizations in terms of citation per paper and relative citation index. Similarly, R. Bergamasco. (65 papers), P.M.G. Paiva. (36 papers) and L.C.B.B Coelho (34 papers) were the most productive authors and F. Anwar. (124.21 and 7.02), J. Beltrán-Heredia (36.07 and 2.04) and J. Sánchez-Martín (34.69 and 1.96) were the leading authors in terms of citation per paper and relative citation index. South African Journal of Botany (62 papers), Journal of Ethnopharmacology (61 papers) and Desalination and Water Treatment (44 papers) were the leading journals contributing to the field.","PeriodicalId":74432,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacognosy reviews","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacognosy reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5530/PHREV.2020.14.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Cite this article: Gupta BM, Ahmed KK. Moringa oleifera: A Bibliometric Analysis of International Publications during 1935-2019. Pharmacog Rev. 2020;14(28):82-90. ABSTRACT The paper examines quantitative and qualitative aspects of research on Moringa oleifera, based on global publications output (3187 publications), as covered in Scopus database during 1935-2019. The publications on Moringa oleifera registered annual average growth of 16.18% and cumulative growth of 3594.0% and averaged to 17.69 citations per paper. Bulk of global publications output (76.72%) and the global citations (68.06%) in the field emanates from top 10 countries. The paper further provides an insight into qualitative performance of research on Moringa oleifera in terms of relative citation index, citations per paper, highly cited papers, besides analyzing the top 25 global organizations and authors in the field, the distribution of publications by broad subjects, the identification of the most significance keywords, the most productive journals and the analysis of higher-cited papers in the field. The study found that Universidade Estadual de Maringa, Brazil (72 papers), National Research Centre, Giza, Egypt (66 papers) and University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan (65 papers) were the most productive organizations and University of Agriculture, Faisalaba, Pakistan (38.35 and 2.17), University of Karachi, Pakistan (35.23 and 1.99) and Mahidol University, Thailand (27.35 and 1.55) were the most significant organizations in terms of citation per paper and relative citation index. Similarly, R. Bergamasco. (65 papers), P.M.G. Paiva. (36 papers) and L.C.B.B Coelho (34 papers) were the most productive authors and F. Anwar. (124.21 and 7.02), J. Beltrán-Heredia (36.07 and 2.04) and J. Sánchez-Martín (34.69 and 1.96) were the leading authors in terms of citation per paper and relative citation index. South African Journal of Botany (62 papers), Journal of Ethnopharmacology (61 papers) and Desalination and Water Treatment (44 papers) were the leading journals contributing to the field.

查看原文本刊更多论文

辣木:1935-2019年国际出版物的文献计量学分析

引用本文:Gupta BM, Ahmed KK。辣木:1935-2019年国际出版物的文献计量学分析。药理学杂志，2020;14(28):82-90。本文基于Scopus数据库1935年至2019年期间的全球出版物产出(3187篇出版物)，对辣木研究的定量和定性方面进行了研究。辣木论文的年平均增长率为16.18%，累计增长率为3594.0%，平均论文引用数为17.69次。该领域的大部分全球出版物产出(76.72%)和全球引用(68.06%)来自排名前10位的国家。本文进一步从相对被引指数、论文被引频次、高被引论文、全球前25名组织和作者、广泛学科的出版物分布、最重要关键词的识别、最高产期刊以及该领域高被引论文的分析等方面深入了解辣木研究的定性表现。研究发现，巴西Maringa Estadual大学(72篇论文)、埃及吉萨国家研究中心(66篇论文)和巴基斯坦费萨拉巴德农业大学(65篇论文)是产量最高的组织，巴基斯坦费萨拉巴农业大学(38.35篇和2.17篇)、巴基斯坦卡拉奇大学(35.23篇和1.99篇)和泰国Mahidol大学(27.35篇和1.55篇)是论文引用率和相对引用指数最高的组织。同样，R. Bergamasco。(65篇论文)，P.M.G. Paiva。(36篇)和l.c.b.b. Coelho(34篇)是最高产的作者;(124.21和7.02)、J. Beltrán-Heredia(36.07和2.04)和J. Sánchez-Martín(34.69和1.96)分别是论文被引频次和相对被引频次最高的作者。《南非植物学杂志》(62篇)、《民族药理学杂志》(61篇)和《海水淡化与水处理》(44篇)是对该领域贡献最大的期刊。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Pharmacognosy reviews

自引率

0.00%

发文量