The relative attractiveness of different types of information about another person

S. Duck, G. Craig
{"title":"The relative attractiveness of different types of information about another person","authors":"S. Duck, G. Craig","doi":"10.1111/J.2044-8260.1977.TB00223.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Four distinctions are drawn between the epistemological and associated theoretical status of stimuli presented to subjects within the affect-reinforcement and information-processing frameworks for investigating interpersonal attraction. Three types of information about others have been used in studies of attractiveness: external (physical properties, sociological status, etc.); impersonal (evidence about the other's attitudes to events or objects); interpersonal (evidence about the other's characteristic descriptions of or attitudes about other individuals). These three types of information are, in terms of the distinctions made earlier, of crucially different significance and status as informers about the other's cognitive structure and content: hence it is predicted that they have different weights as attractive stimuli. A factorial experiment manipulating the three types of information x two levels of similarity showed that information type interacted significantly (P 0.05) with the similarity manipulation, as predicted. The results are interpreted as indicating the likely processes of inference made by strangers about one another as a means of determining future profitability of further acquaintance.","PeriodicalId":76614,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of social and clinical psychology","volume":"25 1","pages":"229-233"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1977-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of social and clinical psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.2044-8260.1977.TB00223.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Four distinctions are drawn between the epistemological and associated theoretical status of stimuli presented to subjects within the affect-reinforcement and information-processing frameworks for investigating interpersonal attraction. Three types of information about others have been used in studies of attractiveness: external (physical properties, sociological status, etc.); impersonal (evidence about the other's attitudes to events or objects); interpersonal (evidence about the other's characteristic descriptions of or attitudes about other individuals). These three types of information are, in terms of the distinctions made earlier, of crucially different significance and status as informers about the other's cognitive structure and content: hence it is predicted that they have different weights as attractive stimuli. A factorial experiment manipulating the three types of information x two levels of similarity showed that information type interacted significantly (P 0.05) with the similarity manipulation, as predicted. The results are interpreted as indicating the likely processes of inference made by strangers about one another as a means of determining future profitability of further acquaintance.
关于另一个人不同类型信息的相对吸引力
在研究人际吸引力的情感强化和信息处理框架中,给出的刺激的认识论和相关理论状态之间有四个区别。关于他人吸引力的研究中使用了三种类型的信息:外在(物理特性、社会地位等);客观的(关于他人对事件或物体的态度的证据);人际关系(关于他人对其他个体的特征描述或态度的证据)。根据前面的区分,这三种类型的信息在告知对方的认知结构和内容方面具有至关重要的不同的重要性和地位:因此可以预测,它们作为有吸引力的刺激具有不同的权重。操纵三种信息类型x两种相似性水平的析因实验表明,正如预测的那样,信息类型与相似性操纵显著交互(p0.05)。结果被解释为表明陌生人对彼此进行推断的可能过程,作为确定进一步认识的未来收益的一种手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信