Accountability Model of Financial Management in the Public Sector: A Study on Panggungharjo Village Budget

A. Basuki, K. Setyowati, R. Wahyunengseh
{"title":"Accountability Model of Financial Management in the Public Sector: A Study on Panggungharjo Village Budget","authors":"A. Basuki, K. Setyowati, R. Wahyunengseh","doi":"10.20476/JBB.V26I1.10312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most research on public accountability is carried out in government agencies. Little looks at the accountability model for village financial management. Little is also known about villages in developing countries having successfully managed their finance that fulfills both formal and substantive aspects of public accountability. This research attempts to analyze Bovens accountability model framework which increases three important accountability elements: right of authority, answerability and enforceability in village financial management. Data are collected through interviews with informants and secondary data from village financial reports. We find that village community forum takes place democratically to ask for accountability but cannot be a substantive accountee. Panggungharjo Village is studied here as depiction of a top performing village at national level that has procedurally and normatively fulfilled the answerability aspect of vertical accountability. However, the potential problem of accountability arises from the essence of accountability from the aspect of democracy, where public participation as accountees is still biased so answerability has not yet emerged on horizontal accountability. Culture of the society and technocratic policies become confounding variables. A theoretical implication simultaneously enriches Bovens’ model is the need to look at the environmental context, namely, bureaucrats’ attitudes in the political context as accountor and the cultural environment of the community as accountee.","PeriodicalId":8986,"journal":{"name":"Bisnis & Birokrasi Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bisnis & Birokrasi Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20476/JBB.V26I1.10312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Most research on public accountability is carried out in government agencies. Little looks at the accountability model for village financial management. Little is also known about villages in developing countries having successfully managed their finance that fulfills both formal and substantive aspects of public accountability. This research attempts to analyze Bovens accountability model framework which increases three important accountability elements: right of authority, answerability and enforceability in village financial management. Data are collected through interviews with informants and secondary data from village financial reports. We find that village community forum takes place democratically to ask for accountability but cannot be a substantive accountee. Panggungharjo Village is studied here as depiction of a top performing village at national level that has procedurally and normatively fulfilled the answerability aspect of vertical accountability. However, the potential problem of accountability arises from the essence of accountability from the aspect of democracy, where public participation as accountees is still biased so answerability has not yet emerged on horizontal accountability. Culture of the society and technocratic policies become confounding variables. A theoretical implication simultaneously enriches Bovens’ model is the need to look at the environmental context, namely, bureaucrats’ attitudes in the political context as accountor and the cultural environment of the community as accountee.
公共部门财务管理的问责制模式——以庞冈哈尔乔村预算为例
大多数关于公共问责的研究都是在政府机构中进行的。很少有人关注农村财务管理的问责模式。发展中国家的村庄是否成功地管理了其财政,履行了公共问责制的正式和实质性方面,这一点也鲜为人知。本研究试图分析Bovens问责模型框架,该框架增加了农村财务管理中的三个重要问责要素:权责、可问责性和可执行性。数据是通过与举报人的访谈和来自村庄财务报告的二手数据收集的。我们发现,村社区论坛民主地进行问责,但不能成为实质性的问责者。这里研究的Panggungharjo村是一个在国家层面上表现最好的村庄,它在程序和规范上履行了垂直问责制的责任方面。然而,问责制的潜在问题来自民主方面问责制的本质,作为问责者的公众参与仍然存在偏见,因此横向问责制尚未出现问责制。社会文化和技术官僚政策成为混淆的变量。同时丰富Bovens模型的一个理论含义是需要关注环境语境,即官僚在政治语境中的态度作为会计员,以及作为会计员的社区文化环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信