Early Australian experience with intravascular lithotripsy treatment of severe calcific coronary stenosis: IVL in acute/chronic coronary syndromes.

A. Doost, J. Marangou, T. Mabote, G. Yong, S. Shetty, A. Whelan, M. Erickson, M. Nguyen, C. Judkins, A. Putrino, A. Ihdayhid, R. Clugston, J. Rankin
{"title":"Early Australian experience with intravascular lithotripsy treatment of severe calcific coronary stenosis: IVL in acute/chronic coronary syndromes.","authors":"A. Doost, J. Marangou, T. Mabote, G. Yong, S. Shetty, A. Whelan, M. Erickson, M. Nguyen, C. Judkins, A. Putrino, A. Ihdayhid, R. Clugston, J. Rankin","doi":"10.4244/aij-d-21-00041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims\nCalcified coronary stenoses are a serious impediment to optimal stent expansion and can lead to stent failure and catastrophic adverse outcomes. We hereby present early Australian experience with intravascular lithotripsy for the treatment of calcific lesions in acute and chronic coronary syndromes.\n\n\nMethods and results\nThis was a single-centre retrospective study of all patients treated with intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) between October 2019 and June 2021. Patient demographics, procedural variables, and treatment safety/efficacy outcomes were evaluated. During this period, there were 40 patients and 41 coronary lesions with IVL-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (70% male; mean age 72.8±9.5 years). Indications for PCI were acute coronary syndromes in 25 patients (62.5%), and stable angina in 15 patients (37.5%). Upfront IVL usage occurred in 5% of cases with the rest being bailout procedures due to suboptimal initial balloon predilatation or stent underexpansion. Angiographic success (<20% residual stenosis) occurred in 37 cases (92.5%), with mean residual stenosis of 8.25%±8.5%. Two patients experienced procedural complications (5%).\n\n\nConclusions\nIVL appears to be a safe and effective modality in modifying coronary calcium to achieve optimal stent expansion in real-world practice. This device obviates the need for more complex lesion preparation strategies such as rotational or orbital atherectomy.","PeriodicalId":72310,"journal":{"name":"AsiaIntervention","volume":"26 1","pages":"42-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AsiaIntervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4244/aij-d-21-00041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims Calcified coronary stenoses are a serious impediment to optimal stent expansion and can lead to stent failure and catastrophic adverse outcomes. We hereby present early Australian experience with intravascular lithotripsy for the treatment of calcific lesions in acute and chronic coronary syndromes. Methods and results This was a single-centre retrospective study of all patients treated with intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) between October 2019 and June 2021. Patient demographics, procedural variables, and treatment safety/efficacy outcomes were evaluated. During this period, there were 40 patients and 41 coronary lesions with IVL-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (70% male; mean age 72.8±9.5 years). Indications for PCI were acute coronary syndromes in 25 patients (62.5%), and stable angina in 15 patients (37.5%). Upfront IVL usage occurred in 5% of cases with the rest being bailout procedures due to suboptimal initial balloon predilatation or stent underexpansion. Angiographic success (<20% residual stenosis) occurred in 37 cases (92.5%), with mean residual stenosis of 8.25%±8.5%. Two patients experienced procedural complications (5%). Conclusions IVL appears to be a safe and effective modality in modifying coronary calcium to achieve optimal stent expansion in real-world practice. This device obviates the need for more complex lesion preparation strategies such as rotational or orbital atherectomy.
澳大利亚早期血管内碎石治疗严重钙化性冠状动脉狭窄的经验:IVL治疗急性/慢性冠状动脉综合征。
钙化的冠状动脉狭窄是最佳支架扩张的严重障碍,可导致支架失效和灾难性的不良后果。我们在此介绍澳大利亚早期血管内碎石术治疗急性和慢性冠状动脉综合征钙化病变的经验。方法和结果这是一项单中心回顾性研究,纳入了2019年10月至2021年6月期间接受血管内碎石术(IVL)治疗的所有患者。评估患者人口统计学、程序变量和治疗安全性/有效性结果。在此期间,有40例患者和41例冠状动脉病变接受了ivl辅助的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)(70%男性;平均年龄72.8±9.5岁)。PCI的适应症为急性冠脉综合征25例(62.5%),稳定性心绞痛15例(37.5%)。5%的病例使用了静脉滴注,其余的病例由于初始球囊预扩张不理想或支架扩张不足而进行了救助手术。血管造影成功(残余狭窄<20%)37例(92.5%),平均残余狭窄为8.25%±8.5%。2例出现手术并发症(5%)。结论在现实生活中,血管内灌注是一种安全有效的调节冠状动脉钙的方式,可以达到最佳的支架扩张。该装置避免了需要更复杂的病变准备策略,如旋转或眶动脉粥样硬化切除术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信