The Challenges of Multi-Level Coordination in Post-Crisis Banking Regulation

L. Quaglia, Aneta Spendzharova
{"title":"The Challenges of Multi-Level Coordination in Post-Crisis Banking Regulation","authors":"L. Quaglia, Aneta Spendzharova","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3135290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the international financial crisis, new financial regulations were adopted at the international, regional (EU) and national levels. The timing, the sequencing and the interaction of reforms at different levels followed distinct patterns, which had implications for the design and the coherence of the rules. Despite the proliferation of new and amended international standards in finance, there are no formal mechanisms in the EU to ensure regulatory coherence in the multi-level, multi-venue regulatory dynamics observed in this sector. To shed light on this issue, we investigate the setting of rules on loss absorbing capacity (LAC) for banks, which is one of the main recent areas of post-crisis reform. We expect that regulators will play a key role in the quest for coherence in finance. The central hypothesis investigated in this paper is that they are better able to secure regulatory coherence when they have considerable rule-making competences.","PeriodicalId":20862,"journal":{"name":"PSN: International Financial Crises (Topic)","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: International Financial Crises (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3135290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

After the international financial crisis, new financial regulations were adopted at the international, regional (EU) and national levels. The timing, the sequencing and the interaction of reforms at different levels followed distinct patterns, which had implications for the design and the coherence of the rules. Despite the proliferation of new and amended international standards in finance, there are no formal mechanisms in the EU to ensure regulatory coherence in the multi-level, multi-venue regulatory dynamics observed in this sector. To shed light on this issue, we investigate the setting of rules on loss absorbing capacity (LAC) for banks, which is one of the main recent areas of post-crisis reform. We expect that regulators will play a key role in the quest for coherence in finance. The central hypothesis investigated in this paper is that they are better able to secure regulatory coherence when they have considerable rule-making competences.
危机后银行监管多层次协调的挑战
国际金融危机后,国际、地区(欧盟)和国家层面相继出台了新的金融监管规定。不同级别改革的时间、顺序和相互作用有不同的模式,这对规则的设计和一致性有影响。尽管新的和经修订的金融国际标准大量涌现,但欧盟没有正式的机制来确保该领域多层次、多地点监管动态的监管一致性。为了阐明这一问题,我们研究了银行损失吸收能力(LAC)规则的制定,这是危机后改革的主要领域之一。我们预计,监管机构将在寻求金融一致性方面发挥关键作用。本文研究的中心假设是,当它们具有相当大的规则制定能力时,它们能够更好地确保监管一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信