Evaluation of osteopathic treatment of patients with distal tibia fractures in the late postoperative period

Irina A. Egorova, Artem V. Dyupin, Aleksandr A. Liverko, A. Chervotok, Mariya N. Filimonova
{"title":"Evaluation of osteopathic treatment of patients with distal tibia fractures in the late postoperative period","authors":"Irina A. Egorova, Artem V. Dyupin, Aleksandr A. Liverko, A. Chervotok, Mariya N. Filimonova","doi":"10.17816/kmj237553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. The postoperative period is often accompanied by pain and limited mobility in the ankle joint. There is a need to evaluate the effectiveness of additional rehabilitation methods in the late postoperative period. \nAim. Evaluation of the effectiveness of complex (standard + osteopathic) treatment compared with standard restorative treatment in patients with distal tibia fractures in the late postoperative period. \nMaterial and methods. In the course of a randomized study, patients in the late postoperative period (68 weeks after surgery; n=40) were divided into two groups: the main group (n=20) received a standard rehabilitation treatment regimen and osteopathic treatment (correction of identified somatic dysfunctions); the comparison group (n=20) only the standard rehabilitation treatment regimen. The amplitude of motion of the affected ankle joint was assessed using a goniometer, the level of pain in the affected ankle joint was assessed using a visual analogue scale, and the level of quality of life was assessed using the SF-36 questionnaire. Data are presented as arithmetic mean and standard deviation M (SD). When analyzing intergroup differences, the nonparametric MannWhitney test (U-test) was used; when analyzing intragroup differences, the nonparametric Wilcoxon test (W-test) was used. The critical level of statistical significance was taken as 5% (p=0.05). \nResults. The addition of osteopathic treatment to the standard scheme led to a significant decrease in the level of pain (0.3 points in the main group, 1.5 points in the comparison group; p=0.0026), an increase in the amplitude of active movements in the ankle joint (64.7 in the main group, 51.8 in the comparison group; p=0.000217), improvement in the quality of life physical functioning (an increase in the indicator in the main group by 39 points, in the comparison group by 26 points), general health (an increase in the indicator in the main group by 47 points, in the comparison group by 28 points). \nConclusion. Combined treatment (standard plus osteopathic) improves the results of restorative treatment compared with standard therapy alone in patients with fractures of the distal tibia in the late postoperative period.","PeriodicalId":17750,"journal":{"name":"Kazan medical journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kazan medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/kmj237553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. The postoperative period is often accompanied by pain and limited mobility in the ankle joint. There is a need to evaluate the effectiveness of additional rehabilitation methods in the late postoperative period. Aim. Evaluation of the effectiveness of complex (standard + osteopathic) treatment compared with standard restorative treatment in patients with distal tibia fractures in the late postoperative period. Material and methods. In the course of a randomized study, patients in the late postoperative period (68 weeks after surgery; n=40) were divided into two groups: the main group (n=20) received a standard rehabilitation treatment regimen and osteopathic treatment (correction of identified somatic dysfunctions); the comparison group (n=20) only the standard rehabilitation treatment regimen. The amplitude of motion of the affected ankle joint was assessed using a goniometer, the level of pain in the affected ankle joint was assessed using a visual analogue scale, and the level of quality of life was assessed using the SF-36 questionnaire. Data are presented as arithmetic mean and standard deviation M (SD). When analyzing intergroup differences, the nonparametric MannWhitney test (U-test) was used; when analyzing intragroup differences, the nonparametric Wilcoxon test (W-test) was used. The critical level of statistical significance was taken as 5% (p=0.05). Results. The addition of osteopathic treatment to the standard scheme led to a significant decrease in the level of pain (0.3 points in the main group, 1.5 points in the comparison group; p=0.0026), an increase in the amplitude of active movements in the ankle joint (64.7 in the main group, 51.8 in the comparison group; p=0.000217), improvement in the quality of life physical functioning (an increase in the indicator in the main group by 39 points, in the comparison group by 26 points), general health (an increase in the indicator in the main group by 47 points, in the comparison group by 28 points). Conclusion. Combined treatment (standard plus osteopathic) improves the results of restorative treatment compared with standard therapy alone in patients with fractures of the distal tibia in the late postoperative period.
胫骨远端骨折术后后期整骨疗法的疗效评价
背景。术后常伴有疼痛和踝关节活动受限。有必要评估术后后期其他康复方法的有效性。的目标。评价术后晚期胫骨远端骨折患者复合(标准+整骨疗法)治疗与标准恢复性治疗的疗效。材料和方法。在一项随机研究中,患者在术后晚期(术后68周;N =40)分为两组:主组(N =20)接受标准康复治疗方案和骨科治疗(纠正已识别的躯体功能障碍);对照组(n=20)仅采用标准康复治疗方案。用测角仪评估受影响踝关节的运动幅度,用视觉模拟量表评估受影响踝关节的疼痛程度,用SF-36问卷评估生活质量水平。数据以算术平均值和标准差M (SD)表示。在分析组间差异时,采用非参数曼惠特尼检验(u检验);在分析组内差异时,采用非参数Wilcoxon检验(W-test)。统计学意义的临界水平为5% (p=0.05)。结果。在标准方案的基础上增加整骨疗法治疗,疼痛水平显著降低(主组为0.3分,对照组为1.5分;P =0.0026),踝关节主动运动幅度增加(主组64.7,对照组51.8;P =0.000217)、生活质量和身体功能的改善(主要组的指标提高了39分,对照组提高了26分)、一般健康状况(主要组的指标提高了47分,对照组提高了28分)。结论。在术后晚期胫骨远端骨折患者中,联合治疗(标准加整骨疗法)比单独标准治疗改善了恢复性治疗的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信