Neural networks to classify employees for tax purposes

James W. Denton, Lutfus Sayeed, Nichelle D. Perkins, Amy H. Moorman
{"title":"Neural networks to classify employees for tax purposes","authors":"James W. Denton,&nbsp;Lutfus Sayeed,&nbsp;Nichelle D. Perkins,&nbsp;Amy H. Moorman","doi":"10.1016/0959-8022(95)00008-W","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Neural network models are compared with logistic regression models to assess their ability to predict federal court judgments in cases classifying workers as employees or independent contractors for tax purposes. Such classification is highly dependent upon the subjective evaluation of certain determining factors. The neural network approach was found to provide a viable alternative for making this prediction. A second experiment compared the predictions of neural network and logistic regression models with those of human novices and experts. It was found that the neural network and logistic regression predictions were superior to those of both human novices and experts. Finally, simple linear regression models were compared with artificial neural network models as well as with human evaluators. The findings were similar to those of the first two experiments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100011,"journal":{"name":"Accounting, Management and Information Technologies","volume":"5 2","pages":"Pages 123-138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0959-8022(95)00008-W","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting, Management and Information Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/095980229500008W","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Neural network models are compared with logistic regression models to assess their ability to predict federal court judgments in cases classifying workers as employees or independent contractors for tax purposes. Such classification is highly dependent upon the subjective evaluation of certain determining factors. The neural network approach was found to provide a viable alternative for making this prediction. A second experiment compared the predictions of neural network and logistic regression models with those of human novices and experts. It was found that the neural network and logistic regression predictions were superior to those of both human novices and experts. Finally, simple linear regression models were compared with artificial neural network models as well as with human evaluators. The findings were similar to those of the first two experiments.

用神经网络对员工进行税务分类
神经网络模型与逻辑回归模型进行了比较,以评估它们预测联邦法院在将工人归类为雇员或独立承包商的案件中的判决的能力。这种分类高度依赖于对某些决定因素的主观评价。发现神经网络方法为进行这种预测提供了一种可行的替代方法。第二个实验将神经网络和逻辑回归模型的预测与人类新手和专家的预测进行了比较。结果表明,神经网络和逻辑回归预测结果优于人类新手和专家的预测结果。最后,将简单线性回归模型与人工神经网络模型以及人工评估器进行了比较。结果与前两个实验的结果相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信