Analysis of Credit Ratings Determinants: Evidences in Brazilian and American States

Nathalia Santos de Oliveira, F. Lima, C. Bonacim, R. C. Gatsios, Alexandre Assaf Neto
{"title":"Analysis of Credit Ratings Determinants: Evidences in Brazilian and American States","authors":"Nathalia Santos de Oliveira, F. Lima, C. Bonacim, R. C. Gatsios, Alexandre Assaf Neto","doi":"10.18488/journal.62.2020.74.248.260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This piece of work, due to its relevance, aims to analyze the methodology used in the determining of ratings, not only expanding the number of variables tested and broadening the discussion on rating determinants, but also using variables which solely measure the market, liquidity credit and operational risks. Thus, the risks mentioned were compared to the ratings set for each Brazilian state from 2013 to 2017 (post-adoption of the MCASP accounting standard for financial statements) and for each American state from 2006 to 2016 (the most recently published financial datum). In face of that, this work is different from the others because it seeks to broaden the researches and the methods used in public listed companies or in financial companies, in public finances of Brazilian and American states, a subject which is little approached in researches. The ordered logit model was used since the credit rating is considered latent variables, besides following an ordinal version. The study was carried out with 50 American states, 26 Brazilian states and 648 ratings altogether. The model proposed in this work proved to be efficient, being able to successfully estimate 64.10% of the sample of the Brazilian states and 68.50% of the sample of the American states. The results reached are specially relevant for stakeholders, who are able to analyze or manage their possible investments regarding risk and return.","PeriodicalId":53010,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Business and Islamic Economics","volume":"65 1","pages":"248-260"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Business and Islamic Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.62.2020.74.248.260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This piece of work, due to its relevance, aims to analyze the methodology used in the determining of ratings, not only expanding the number of variables tested and broadening the discussion on rating determinants, but also using variables which solely measure the market, liquidity credit and operational risks. Thus, the risks mentioned were compared to the ratings set for each Brazilian state from 2013 to 2017 (post-adoption of the MCASP accounting standard for financial statements) and for each American state from 2006 to 2016 (the most recently published financial datum). In face of that, this work is different from the others because it seeks to broaden the researches and the methods used in public listed companies or in financial companies, in public finances of Brazilian and American states, a subject which is little approached in researches. The ordered logit model was used since the credit rating is considered latent variables, besides following an ordinal version. The study was carried out with 50 American states, 26 Brazilian states and 648 ratings altogether. The model proposed in this work proved to be efficient, being able to successfully estimate 64.10% of the sample of the Brazilian states and 68.50% of the sample of the American states. The results reached are specially relevant for stakeholders, who are able to analyze or manage their possible investments regarding risk and return.
信用评级决定因素分析:巴西和美国各州的证据
这项工作,由于其相关性,旨在分析在确定评级中使用的方法,不仅扩大了测试变量的数量,扩大了对评级决定因素的讨论,而且还使用了单独衡量市场、流动性信用和操作风险的变量。因此,将所提到的风险与2013年至2017年巴西各州(采用MCASP财务报表会计准则后)和2006年至2016年美国各州(最新公布的财务数据)的评级进行了比较。面对这一点,这项工作是不同于其他的,因为它试图拓宽研究和在上市公司或金融公司使用的方法,在巴西和美国各州的公共财政,这是一个很少接近的研究课题。由于信用评级被认为是潜在变量,因此除了遵循序数版本外,还使用了有序logit模型。这项研究是在美国50个州和巴西26个州进行的,总共有648个评级。在这项工作中提出的模型被证明是有效的,能够成功地估计64.10%的巴西各州样本和68.50%的美国各州样本。所达到的结果与利益相关者特别相关,他们能够分析或管理他们关于风险和回报的可能投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信