Concept Mapping in a Flipped Clinical Environment: A Basic Qualitative Study

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Juliet Onabadejo
{"title":"Concept Mapping in a Flipped Clinical Environment: A Basic Qualitative Study","authors":"Juliet Onabadejo","doi":"10.5206/cjsotlrcacea.2023.1.8534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The need to encourage critical thinking and academically engage nursing students in a clinical environment compels faculty use of assorted teaching strategies, including concept mapping and flipped learning. Though nurse educators encourage both strategies, concurrent use of both methods in clinical teaching is rare. Thus, this study examined the use of concept mapping in a flipped clinical course to encourage students’ engagement and critical thinking. Twelve baccalaureate nursing students in a second-year medical-surgical clinical course provided the data for this basic qualitative study by completing journals or diaries throughout the course and through individual semi-structured interviews at course exit. Open coding of interview transcripts and journals in conjunction with constant comparative analysis helped develop categories and themes. Several overlapping themes emerged from interview and journal data. Nursing students indicated that they developed different ways of thinking, learned from many people, became actively involved in learning and expanded their thinking, connected information, determined clinical priorities and made decisions, became confident and knowledgeable in their ability to recall information and transfer knowledge, and experienced increased critical thinking and higher level thinking skills. The results of the study showed the participants derived positive meaning from their learning in a nontraditional flipped clinical with concept mapping. Students were actively engaged in their learning and were able to expand their thinking while working collaboratively with their instructor, patients, and staff.","PeriodicalId":44267,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotlrcacea.2023.1.8534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The need to encourage critical thinking and academically engage nursing students in a clinical environment compels faculty use of assorted teaching strategies, including concept mapping and flipped learning. Though nurse educators encourage both strategies, concurrent use of both methods in clinical teaching is rare. Thus, this study examined the use of concept mapping in a flipped clinical course to encourage students’ engagement and critical thinking. Twelve baccalaureate nursing students in a second-year medical-surgical clinical course provided the data for this basic qualitative study by completing journals or diaries throughout the course and through individual semi-structured interviews at course exit. Open coding of interview transcripts and journals in conjunction with constant comparative analysis helped develop categories and themes. Several overlapping themes emerged from interview and journal data. Nursing students indicated that they developed different ways of thinking, learned from many people, became actively involved in learning and expanded their thinking, connected information, determined clinical priorities and made decisions, became confident and knowledgeable in their ability to recall information and transfer knowledge, and experienced increased critical thinking and higher level thinking skills. The results of the study showed the participants derived positive meaning from their learning in a nontraditional flipped clinical with concept mapping. Students were actively engaged in their learning and were able to expand their thinking while working collaboratively with their instructor, patients, and staff.
翻转临床环境中的概念映射:一项基本定性研究
需要鼓励批判性思维和学术参与护理学生在临床环境迫使教师使用各种教学策略,包括概念映射和翻转学习。虽然护士教育工作者鼓励这两种策略,但在临床教学中同时使用这两种方法是罕见的。因此,本研究考察了概念图在翻转临床课程中的使用,以鼓励学生的参与和批判性思维。12名医学外科临床课程二年级的护理学士学位学生通过在课程中完成日志或日记以及在课程结束时通过个人半结构化访谈为这项基本的定性研究提供了数据。对采访记录和日志进行公开编码,并结合不断的比较分析,有助于形成分类和主题。采访和期刊数据中出现了几个重叠的主题。护理学生表示,他们发展了不同的思维方式,向许多人学习,积极参与学习和拓展思维,连接信息,确定临床重点和决策,对自己回忆信息和转移知识的能力变得自信和知识渊博,批判性思维和更高层次的思维能力得到了提高。研究结果表明,参与者在非传统的概念映射翻转临床学习中获得了积极的意义。学生们积极地参与到他们的学习中,并能够在与他们的老师、病人和工作人员合作的同时拓展他们的思维。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信