R. Valji, M. Castro-Codesal, Melanie Lewis, J. MacLean
{"title":"Comparison of non-invasive ventilation use and outcomes in children with Down syndrome and other children using this technology","authors":"R. Valji, M. Castro-Codesal, Melanie Lewis, J. MacLean","doi":"10.3389/frsle.2023.1169236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rationale Children with Down syndrome (DS) make up a substantial portion of long-term non-invasive ventilation (LT-NIV) users though it is unclear if their unique features alter LT-NIV efficacy or use. The aim of this study is to compare the use and outcomes of LT-NIV for children with DS and a matched comparison (MCG). Methods This is a sub-study of a 10-year retrospective review of children initiated on LT-NIV in Alberta, Canada (N = 622). Children with DS (n = 106) were matched in a 1:2 ratio with other children using LT-NIV based on age and therapy start date. Data was collected from medical and sleep laboratory records. Results Upper airway disease was the most common indication for LT-NIV in both groups, though was higher in children with DS (DS: 90% vs. MCG: 50%, OR 8.64 [95% CI 4.38–17.04]). Sleep and respiratory parameters, at the baseline diagnostic sleep study and the change from baseline to treatment study, did not differ between groups. Nasal masks were the predominant mask type in both children with DS (55%) and the MCG (66%) with more children with DS, compared to the MCG, using full face masks (DS: 45 vs. MCG: 33%, p < 0.05). Continuous positive airway pressure was used more often in children with DS (93.3% vs. 69.2%, p < 0.001) while bilevel-positive airway pressure was more common in the MCG (DS: 6.7% vs. MCG 30.8%, p < 0.001). Children with DS were followed longer than children in the MCG (DS: 2.4 [IQR 2.8] vs. MCG: 1.8 [IQR 2.7] years, p < 0.05). Adherence was lower in children with DS at both 6–12 month follow-up and most recent visit with a similar decrease in adherence in both groups over the follow-up period (0.0 [IQR 1.4] vs. −0.3 [IQR 2.0]. Despite this, 66% and 49% of children with DS used LT-NIV for more than 4 h/night at the 6–12 month and most current visit, respectively. Discontinuation of LT-NIV and mortality did not differ between groups. Conclusion LT-NIV is a common and efficacious treatment in children with DS used predominantly for upper airway obstruction. While adherence is lower, the majority of children with DS are successful at using LT-NIV.","PeriodicalId":73106,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in sleep","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in sleep","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frsle.2023.1169236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rationale Children with Down syndrome (DS) make up a substantial portion of long-term non-invasive ventilation (LT-NIV) users though it is unclear if their unique features alter LT-NIV efficacy or use. The aim of this study is to compare the use and outcomes of LT-NIV for children with DS and a matched comparison (MCG). Methods This is a sub-study of a 10-year retrospective review of children initiated on LT-NIV in Alberta, Canada (N = 622). Children with DS (n = 106) were matched in a 1:2 ratio with other children using LT-NIV based on age and therapy start date. Data was collected from medical and sleep laboratory records. Results Upper airway disease was the most common indication for LT-NIV in both groups, though was higher in children with DS (DS: 90% vs. MCG: 50%, OR 8.64 [95% CI 4.38–17.04]). Sleep and respiratory parameters, at the baseline diagnostic sleep study and the change from baseline to treatment study, did not differ between groups. Nasal masks were the predominant mask type in both children with DS (55%) and the MCG (66%) with more children with DS, compared to the MCG, using full face masks (DS: 45 vs. MCG: 33%, p < 0.05). Continuous positive airway pressure was used more often in children with DS (93.3% vs. 69.2%, p < 0.001) while bilevel-positive airway pressure was more common in the MCG (DS: 6.7% vs. MCG 30.8%, p < 0.001). Children with DS were followed longer than children in the MCG (DS: 2.4 [IQR 2.8] vs. MCG: 1.8 [IQR 2.7] years, p < 0.05). Adherence was lower in children with DS at both 6–12 month follow-up and most recent visit with a similar decrease in adherence in both groups over the follow-up period (0.0 [IQR 1.4] vs. −0.3 [IQR 2.0]. Despite this, 66% and 49% of children with DS used LT-NIV for more than 4 h/night at the 6–12 month and most current visit, respectively. Discontinuation of LT-NIV and mortality did not differ between groups. Conclusion LT-NIV is a common and efficacious treatment in children with DS used predominantly for upper airway obstruction. While adherence is lower, the majority of children with DS are successful at using LT-NIV.
长期无创通气(LT-NIV)的使用者中,唐氏综合征(DS)患儿占了很大一部分,尽管尚不清楚他们的独特特征是否会改变LT-NIV的疗效或使用。本研究的目的是比较LT-NIV在DS患儿和匹配比较(MCG)中的使用和结果。方法:本研究是对加拿大阿尔伯塔省(N = 622)开始接受LT-NIV治疗的儿童进行的10年回顾性研究的一项亚研究。根据年龄和治疗开始日期,将106例DS患儿与其他使用LT-NIV的患儿按1:2的比例进行匹配。数据收集自医学和睡眠实验室记录。结果两组中上呼吸道疾病是LT-NIV最常见的适应症,但DS患儿的适应症更高(DS: 90% vs. MCG: 50%, OR 8.64 [95% CI 4.38-17.04])。在基线诊断性睡眠研究和从基线到治疗性研究的变化中,两组之间的睡眠和呼吸参数没有差异。鼻罩是DS患儿(55%)和MCG患儿(66%)的主要口罩类型,与MCG患儿相比,更多DS患儿使用全面罩(DS: 45% vs MCG: 33%, p < 0.05)。持续气道正压在DS患儿中更为常见(93.3% vs. 69.2%, p < 0.001),而双水平气道正压在MCG患儿中更为常见(DS: 6.7% vs. MCG: 30.8%, p < 0.001)。DS患儿随访时间较MCG患儿长(DS: 2.4 [IQR 2.8]年,MCG: 1.8 [IQR 2.7]年,p < 0.05)。在6-12个月的随访和最近的随访中,DS患儿的依从性较低,两组在随访期间的依从性下降相似(0.0 [IQR 1.4]对- 0.3 [IQR 2.0])。尽管如此,66%和49%的DS患儿分别在6-12个月和最近一次就诊时使用LT-NIV超过4小时/夜。两组间LT-NIV停药和死亡率无差异。结论LT-NIV是治疗儿童退行性椎体滑移的一种常见且有效的方法,主要用于上气道阻塞。虽然依从性较低,但大多数退行性痴呆儿童成功地使用了LT-NIV。